Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Hey, that was supposed to be a secret

It WAS supposed to be a secret. But SOMEONE already let it out.

So... foka isn't the only one blackmailing you, then?

Holy Darn, I thought it was in the lounge... I appologize, I'm really sorry, please delte it as soon as possible!!! I would hate to ruin my rep as staying within the lines in the forum.

I'm really embarrassed and I hope that you're the only one that reads it Shrike. Please Delete it ASAP as a favor to me

Dr. Arbitrary

Done. All I ask is that we don't have anymore PC-DAG centric threads.

At 6/14/03 05:10 PM, TheShrike wrote: btw... a little something I found in general concerning jimsween

Hmm... geez Jim. How does it feel to be nominated for king asshole?

At 6/15/03 12:44 AM, alejandro1 wrote: Hmm... geez Jim. How does it feel to be nominated for king asshole?

You know when it's a daily occurence you have to get used to it after a while.

I wonder if there should be an AOTD alongside the UOTD....

At 6/15/03 02:08 AM, Shih wrote:

At 6/15/03 12:44 AM, alejandro1 wrote: Hmm... geez Jim. How does it feel to be nominated for king asshole?

You know when it's a daily occurence you have to get used to it after a while.

He should know what it feels like. He's been nominated about 9 times. Jimsween definately the AOTD.

At 6/15/03 02:13 AM, TheShrike wrote: I wonder if there should be an AOTD alongside the UOTD....

Yeah... he could lose some exp. pts as a reward...

At 6/15/03 03:35 AM, poxpower wrote:
Yeah... he could lose some exp. pts as a reward...

Now that's an interesting idea, how about just a straight drop of one level?

At 6/15/03 07:25 AM, Shih wrote:
Now that's an interesting idea, how about just a straight drop of one level?

Oh come on, that's just too harsh ;)

Think about all those poor assholes :(
They'd never come back :(

nah, just replace their level picture with goatse

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/search.php?kind=b&terms=Slizor
Anyone want to sign the petition to ban me?

At 6/15/03 12:54 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: nah, just replace their level picture with goatse

All right doc you win that's the best one I've heard so far.

There's only one thread devoted to me.. :(
From some crazy guy who asked "What do you work?"

Awww... poor teddy. =[

Shrike is so much more popular, and foka is so much more hated.

I'm actually grooming a nice set of idiots who want to flame me after they get banned.

Some idiot who made an I'm leaving (for tonight) topic.

PEOPLE ARE STUPID

Wow... I gotta remember to take off my platypus gloves when I type... Seems I forget entire words...

I just thoguh about smoething... when's the last time anyone talked about politics in this thread? Going by the same logic as the one used to lock up another similar thread, this topic dosen't belong in the politics forum.

At 6/15/03 08:14 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: I just thoguh about smoething... when's the last time anyone talked about politics in this thread? Going by the same logic as the one used to lock up another similar thread, this topic dosen't belong in the politics forum.

Well, considering you're new here, I'll give you an update:

READ THE TITLE!

Where in the title does it say we all must discuss politics here? This thread is for unrelated discussion between regulars in the forum. So, in it's very essence, this thread is related to the forum.

The thread you're talking about was spam. Pure and simple spam. It served no purpose except to take up space.

And I locked that thread you're talking about because it was pure spam. There is a difference.

Hmm... How about this,

Anyone think Kant was right when he said
"Teachers of jurisprudence, when speaking of rights and claims,distinguish in a cause the question of right (quid juris) from the question of fact (quid facti), and while they demand proof of both, they give to the proof of the former, which goes to establish right or claim in law, the name of deduction. Now we make use of a great number of empirical conceptions, without opposition from any one; and consider ourselves, even without any attempt at deduction, justified in attaching to them a sense, and a supposititious signification, because we have always experience at hand to demonstrate their objective reality. There exist also, however, usurped onceptions, such as fortune, fate, which circulate with almost universal indulgence, and yet are occasionally challenged by the question, "quid
juris?" In such cases, we have great difficulty in discovering any deduction for these terms, inasmuch as we cannot produce any manifest ground of right, either from experience or from reason, on which the claim to employ them can be founded.

There, does that make this thread acceptable now?

Dr. Arbitrary

At 6/15/03 08:58 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: There, does that make this thread acceptable now?

Actually, I forgot to mention before, but political issues have been discussed here before. So... uh.. yes?

At 6/15/03 08:58 PM, TheShrike wrote: And I locked that thread you're talking about because it was pure spam. There is a difference.

Are we both talking about the DAG thread?

At 6/15/03 10:06 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: Are we both talking about the DAG thread?

Ah, that. Well, it was actually a thread that should have gone in Clubs & Crews, not in this forum.

At 6/15/03 10:10 PM, TheShrike wrote:

At 6/15/03 10:06 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: Are we both talking about the DAG thread?

Ah, that. Well, it was actually a thread that should have gone in Clubs & Crews, not in this forum.

But it is basically the same thing as this thread were in right now, Prove me wrong, but I see no difference between the two.

At 6/15/03 10:21 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: But it is basically the same thing as this thread were in right now, Prove me wrong, but I see no difference between the two.

Look, pop, its bad enough that they got rid of that wonderful "other" thread (it still hurts to say its name), but this thread is [i]almost[/i] as good. No reason to lose both, right? Unlike some people, I refuse to be spiteful about the whole ordeal. I think of it more of an exchange. "that" thread, for the DAG forum, which runs faster, has better features, and otherwise kicks the living crap out of the "other" thread hands down. I only regret not having a constant link to it on the NG BBS.

Although, technically I always considered intergroup politics to still be politics, even when aforementioned groups only exist on a bbs. so then by my book the "other" thread wasnt spam or flame, but in fact political, just in a non-traditional sense.

BTW, Mikehrt isnt my twin brother, but we did come out of the same vagina, although 4 years apart.

Well stated Funk,Mrpopnfresh its in the past now,i dont see why the DAG/PC cant lounge in peace...besides we can always eventually take over the thread...

Why can't they all be like you and shih?