At 9/11/06 10:54 AM, JohnnyUtah wrote:
At 9/11/06 09:06 AM, liranmov wrote:
i just dont understand why???here's a recap of the last 30 pages:
we need to make these changes and here's why
BUT UH I DONT GET IT WAAAAA!!
we're not doing this for merely cosmetic changes, pay attention
WHAT THE FUCK I DISAGREE WITH THIS!
learn to read you ignorant worm, it's been explained 15 times in this thread already
I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHYYYY!!! (you)
And then repeat x 100 to produce 30 pages of the above, don't leave out that part!
At 9/11/06 05:45 PM, FatherTime89 wrote:
At 9/10/06 06:40 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
Yes that explains everything to me completely thanks for taking the time to write all that. I will now never complain about this again.
I hope this makes it a bit more understandable.
Awesomeness. And just for the record, your complaining about it was nowhere near as annoying as a lot of other complaints I read last weekend, so don't worry about it.
At 9/11/06 09:46 PM, dcp2k4 wrote:
dude thats kinda fucked up to just delete accounts like that, i mean i know there inactive but its still there account like my yahoo account got deleted like a month ago because it was inactive and now i need some of the art i uploaded on to geocities awhile ago but now its gone, if the account is inactive but the user has a submission to the portal(s) does it still get deleted? and what qualifys inactive, i post occasionaly but not alot
Tom isn't committing wholesale slaughter.
Old accounts aren't being insta-deleted, their NAMES (such as "steve" or "john" or "mike," names that other people MIGHT like to have but can't because someone who signed up in 1999 or 2000 took and then never bothered to use their accounts for anything...)...
Anyway, the NAMES of these old accounts are just being reset. To something like steve0001 or something, so ACTIVE users can have the good names without -s, _s, numbers, etc. etc.
Good ol' plaintext name with no need for symbols or numbers all over the place.