At 9/3/06 09:09 PM, ExuberantGlock wrote: Oh, don't forget nostalgists!
Are you inferring that I have a Deviantart account? 'Cause if you were, I do. A long defunct one, but a Deviantart account none the less.
At 9/3/06 09:09 PM, ExuberantGlock wrote: Oh, don't forget nostalgists!
Are you inferring that I have a Deviantart account? 'Cause if you were, I do. A long defunct one, but a Deviantart account none the less.
At 9/3/06 09:12 PM, -Gendo- wrote:At 9/3/06 09:09 PM, ExuberantGlock wrote: Oh, don't forget nostalgists!Are you inferring that I have a Deviantart account? 'Cause if you were, I do. A long defunct one, but a Deviantart account none the less.
Uh, no sir. Was implying that DA's also filled with nostalgists, aside from anime fags and goths/emos.
At 9/3/06 08:55 PM, Idocreating wrote: Actually i wouldn't consider Example 3 a Furry. It seems like the only Furry part of it is the head and it resembles a human too much.
Or maybe thats the Anime style of it. Nonetheless i don't think 3 is a Furry.
That's called a neko. It's popular in Japan. Girl with cat ears and a tail.
I think that people like furries because they're cute with their animal faces ect., but there bodies are human enough for it to be hentai.
At 9/3/06 09:16 PM, ExuberantGlock wrote: Uh, no sir. Was implying that DA's also filled with nostalgists, aside from anime fags and goths/emos.
Goddamn, sonny. For the crime of giving a serious answer to a sarcastic question, I sentence you to death by firing squad. JEBSLEY! Assemble a group of armed men, drag this individual behind the chemical sheds and have him shot.
Monster Count: 2999 - Countdown to 3000
DO ANY OF YOU BOYS LIVE IN VIRGINIA?!
DA is more known for its homosexual erotic art.
RoseSOAS: you should know i dont think this far ahead
Me made simple: well you already thought as far as holding a chicken while in your underwear
i dont really have a problem with anthro art..some of it is acually pretty cool.
At 9/3/06 09:57 PM, TheSovereign wrote: Needs more... penis!
I Lol'D
At 9/3/06 09:57 PM, TheSovereign wrote: Needs more... penis!
no, no, no......it needs more.....TENTACLESSSS!!
i see nothing wrong with it. its not like you can actually fuck the picks. i myself have drawn some furries. its actually pretty fun! but it doesnt turn me on, sorry.
At 8/30/06 06:35 AM, WilliWowza wrote: Who is turned on by this? Be honest
In all honesty. Me.
*Fap fap fap* yeah, who likes DA? *fap* I means, really it's *fap* just plain stupid! *Fap fap fap*
At 9/3/06 09:55 PM, SolNigerWithin00 wrote: i dont really have a problem with anthro art..some of it is acually pretty cool.
this artist seems to be good at it.
heh, my favorite artist
Psh, furries is nothing.
All in all, Deviantart doesn't care about people who don't masturbate to Japan.
They really need to just rename the website to Deviantporn. Or maybe DeviantWap.
One of the two.
At 10/1/06 01:01 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: They really need to just rename the website to Deviantporn. Or maybe DeviantWap.
One of the two.
Better yet, New Japan.
At 10/1/06 01:01 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: They really need to just rename the website to Deviantporn. Or maybe DeviantWap.
They don't allow erections on deviantart. And everyone that draws porn is generally a pretentious asshole.
And anyone remember that prepubescant overrated artist there? Man, the whole site's all over her, it's amazing.
At 8/30/06 06:35 AM, WilliWowza wrote: Who is turned on by this? Be honest
I came.
At 10/1/06 01:05 AM, BlackNoise wrote:At 8/30/06 06:35 AM, WilliWowza wrote: Who is turned on by this? Be honestI came.
Because they sexualized an ugly-ass mammal.
Furry art has brought us many great images to meditate on and further our spiritual development.
And just because you do not find furri porn hawt you have to bash it like a moron?
At 10/1/06 01:26 AM, BaronVonBadGuy wrote: Furry art has brought us many great images to meditate on and further our spiritual development.
Do sponges and starfish count as furries?
If so, huh........
Anyway, from what I've seen, there are varying degrees of Furryism. There are those who prefer animals drawn more to look like humans with only a few animal like features (ears, tail, fur), those who take the more harcore path and prefer animals in their natural form (bordering on beastiality), and those who look at it from a purely artsy point of view.
People are usually of these views, or somewhere in between.
Sense is made.
At 8/30/06 06:21 AM, WilliWowza wrote: Oh, and I won't even start on Kingdom Hearts obsession, I just have no idea about that one...
That's where you're wrong. Super Smash Bros. is more dominant than that.
Well, you just have to respect other people's fetishes.