USERNAME:
PASSWORD:
Save Info!
Logging in…
This topic is 2 pages long. [ 1 | 2 ]
[ Profile | Posts | Contact ]
Posted at: 8/26/06 07:27 AM
Sign-Up: 07/08/04
Posts: 218
You're the nube.... seconds is only for == 2
Sign-Up: 03/04/05
Posts: 7,744
At 8/26/06 07:23 AM, -Toast- wrote: To all you big nubs, the correct spelling is second, and not seconds, because it's < 2. :p
To all you big nubs, the correct spelling is second, and not seconds, because it's < 2. :p
What? 0seconds, 0.5 seconds, 1 second, 1.5 seconds. Otherwise it doesn't sound right.
So are you saying its -345 second?
Posted at: 8/26/06 07:29 AM
Damn I'm a nube too
correction - second only for == 1
Posted at: 8/26/06 07:43 AM
Sign-Up: 04/02/05
Posts: 8,414
At 8/26/06 07:29 AM, Go0gley wrote: Damn I'm a nube too
nube? yes you're all nubes. It doesn't sound right because everyone says seconds for 0.5 etc, so your ear gets used to it. It's like the proper spelling of fruit in plurial is fruit, not fruits, but people say fruits because everyone says fruits because mr toast is the only nerd who will go and check the right spelling.
I put on my robe and wizard hat Why don't you check out my check out my userpage?
Posted at: 8/26/06 11:05 AM
Sign-Up: 07/07/06
Posts: 74
I know what he means. 0.01 second 132762888 seconds That's the correct spelling. O and thanks for all the codes.
Posted at: 8/26/06 11:07 AM
At 8/26/06 11:05 AM, aso-products wrote: O and thanks for all the codes.
Lol, we're productive :).
At 8/26/06 05:46 AM, -Toast- wrote: Noes I think the frame1 frame2 were just an example. Your code wouldn't work if he uses labels like 'poopoo'. He's gonna see your code is shorter, use it, nothing will happen and the poor innocent newb would get confused :(
And the only one who is a noob here is you on your mother ass. Thank you.
All times are Eastern Standard Time (GMT -5) | Current Time: 09:28 AM
<< Back