Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Power to white? YOU NAZI SCUM! Im just glad australia hasnt any racist bastards like you.. Piss off mate and take you nazism to hitlers Corpse!

At 8/18/06 04:59 AM, fli wrote:

You're denying that Eastern Europe isn't fucked up albiet White countries?
LoL...

Eastern Europe is pretty trashy, yes.

But these countries have different ethnicities than Western Europe/Canada/US, even though they are 'white' in appearance.

Another reason for the poverty in Eastern European countries is the fact that for years while the western countries were trading in prosperty (led by America), eastern european countries were under communist rule and were prevented from trading with the US.

Now to expound on the subject of this thread:

There is not one prosperous and successful country in this world that does not have trading relations with the United states. Now with that said, pretty much every nation in the world that has bad poverty doesn NOT have close economic cooperation with the United states.

If the United States ceased trading with or investing in any country in the world, that country's economy will grind to a halt.

Canada for example, successful country for sure but almost their entire country relies on US investment, US products, and almost all their successful businesses are owned by US companies.

The same can be said about any successful country in the world. If the US doesn't trade with you, you're fucked and your people will go hungry.

At 8/18/06 05:08 AM, Destroyo wrote: Power to white? YOU NAZI SCUM! Im just glad australia hasnt any racist bastards like you.. Piss off mate and take you nazism to hitlers Corpse!

First of all, just because a person thinks their race does something better than another race doesn't make them a Nazi. Many people of all races think that their race is superior, its only the whites that get demonized for it though/

Secondly, you're a hypocrite Destroyo!

Why don't you mention the horrible things that white Australians have done to the Aboriginese people?

Whites in Australia are allowed to make segregated businesses and establishments that do not allow dark skinned aboriginese to enter even to this day

Yeah...you're pretty stupid to suggest that Australia doesn't have racists in it.

At 8/16/06 08:32 PM, mrshizel wrote:

At 8/16/06 08:24 PM, Transkar wrote:

At 8/16/06 08:22 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Funny because most of Eastern Europe is a shithole.

Then whats Africa and Asia?

actually israel has one of the most powerfull armies in the world

o yes they have.. but how many wars have they won?. if you look at the statictic?

--love for the attachment on my body--

That’s it! I’m going to use a little thing called Science: People with White skin adapted to their environment which is much cooler so they made their skin white to keep cool. White skin doesn’t affect the brain in any way! There are black people who are smarter than white and vice versa! Our brains are practically the same, excluding a few individualities but a black person’s brain might be more similar to a white person’s brain than another white person. It just so happened that in the past by coincidence a white person was a little eviler and decided to pillage Asia and India. And even then it wasn’t because of superior tactics, I mean Britain was losing the war in India until they killed the King and India surrendered therefore your theory is stupid.

I rest my case.

At 8/18/06 04:46 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: I think it is true that the white nations of the earth are more efficient, more prosperous and just better off overall.

3. India, was colonized by Britain. Britain left and for years India was crap. Now Indias economy revolves around trade with white countries.

WTF! India was worse off after Britain! Britain stole fin silk and their jewels and other properties! If it wasn’t for Britain India would be far richer! And their economy doesn’t revolve around Europe a fraction is given to themselves quite a large fraction is with China and Japan and if Europe sank to the bottom of the sea they would just focus on Asia more.

At 8/18/06 05:22 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 8/18/06 05:08 AM, Destroyo wrote: Power to white? YOU NAZI SCUM! Im just glad australia hasnt any racist bastards like you.. Piss off mate and take you nazism to hitlers Corpse!

First of all, just because a person thinks their race does something better than another race doesn't make them a Nazi. Many people of all races think that their race is superior, its only the whites that get demonized for it though/

It’s not true! DNA is exactly the same and so is the brain the only thing different is white people adapted to the cold and black people adapted to the heat! That is proven fact and you can’t deny it! And also the whole idea of a Master race was started by Hitler! And if you think this no doubt you would think it would be better to clean the gene pool to let this master race develop? That’s what the Nazis thought!

At 8/17/06 08:06 PM, someguy612 wrote: Also, another reason why european countries have such powerful nations is that the industrial revolution was centered around england and then later the rest of europe and N.america.
This led to the printing press which allowed information and ideas to travel between people faster through books and newspaper which means the nation is smarter.

this means that the advancement of the nation is faster and allows ideas such as electricity, the lightbulb, the locomotive, the television, the radio, the personal computer, the micro-chip, the internet,etc. which all provide information to be sent to one and other and the sharing of ideas to be done even faster. and so the nation advances more.

Do you have any idea of what you are on about at all? I will only point out one problem so you can figure out the rest, the printing press was developed 300 years before the industrial revolution got off the ground.

At 8/18/06 04:46 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:
2. China, was once colonized by European countries. Almost all the money that China gets today comes from trade with white countries (mostly the US). If it werent for the US need for large amounts of cheap products, China's economy would almost be nonexistent.

WRONG! It was not colonized! And doesnt anyone ever mention botswana?

Hahahaha oh yeah, we're doing great here in america. Moron.

At 8/18/06 02:42 PM, 0Random_Hero0 wrote: Hahahaha oh yeah, we're doing great here in america. Moron.

Perhaps you'd be happier in Kenya then? Or what about Pakistan?

At 8/17/06 05:15 PM, Pwnage_In_A_Can wrote:

At 8/17/06 05:09 PM, metalhead0001 wrote: Hitler was white. Are you saying that all world leaders nead to be like Hitler? And a lot Europe isn't that great of time ether.

The reason both those things are shit is because they followed or still do follow socialism. Not because of the race they were born in.

Exactly. That is my point. It doesn't matter what race you are; if you're a bad leader, your a bad leader.

At 8/18/06 09:51 AM, White_hole wrote:

At 8/18/06 04:46 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:
2. China, was once colonized by European countries. Almost all the money that China gets today comes from trade with white countries (mostly the US). If it werent for the US need for large amounts of cheap products, China's economy would almost be nonexistent.

WRONG! It was not colonized! And doesnt anyone ever mention botswana?

Yeah and it's not really fair to say that Chinese economy would be ruined without trade with white countries, because quite frankly the U.S (a mostly white nation) would go bankrupt if anything happened to either Japan or China, and is already $7 trillion into debt, yeah great leadership over here.

actually israel has one of the most powerfull armies in the world

Nice weaponry as well..they made the infamous desert eagle and the Galil

At 8/18/06 04:01 PM, Davious wrote:

Yeah and it's not really fair to say that Chinese economy would be ruined without trade with white countries, because quite frankly the U.S (a mostly white nation) would go bankrupt if anything happened to either Japan or China, and is already $7 trillion into debt, yeah great leadership over here.

Your point is?

At 8/18/06 04:01 PM, Davious wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:51 AM, White_hole wrote:

At 8/18/06 04:46 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:
2. China, was once colonized by European countries. Almost all the money that China gets today comes from trade with white countries (mostly the US). If it werent for the US need for large amounts of cheap products, China's economy would almost be nonexistent.

WRONG! It was not colonized! And doesnt anyone ever mention botswana?

Yeah and it's not really fair to say that Chinese economy would be ruined without trade with white countries, because quite frankly the U.S (a mostly white nation) would go bankrupt if anything happened to either Japan or China, and is already $7 trillion into debt, yeah great leadership over here.

WRONG! Japan and China both hold large amounts of US treasury bonds, this prevents America from going bankrupt. But they do this for themselves because despite the fact that the US dollar has lost value in the last couple of years, it is still the most used and most stable form of currency in the world.

But if China and Japan no longer bought US bonds, some other country or countries would step in and do it for sure.

Now yes the US is 7 trillion in debt, but the US makes over twice that amount (15 trillion) in one year. The 7 trillion dollar debt has been accumulating for years.

THe US debt is actually low compared the the amount of the money the US takes in every year people just say "7 trillion" but leave out the fact that this is actually low compared to Americas income and is lower in proportion than many other countries.

Canada for example makes 1 trillion a year in GDP, but they have a national debt of 4 trillion which is 400% of their yearly GDP. The US debt is less than 50% of its yearly GDP.

Now with that said, the US income is largely coming from within itself because the US is the biggest host in the world Market, but if the US cut off China or Japan from trading with the US or in the US, they would be royally fucked considering almost their ENTIRE economy revolves around US investment, and the US buying their cheap electronics and such. Plus, Japan would never cut off relations with the US because they need the US to give them military equipment and to protect them from North Korea or pissibly in the future protect them from China.

Almost EVERY SINGLE major industrial country has MOST of their economy riding on their market cooperation with the US. To suggest otherwise is to distory reality in your head so that you can serve your "America sucks" thinking error.

Also the U.S gives out 80% of the worlds grain. SO STFU!

White people trying to do things by themselves suck at it.

Can anyone remember when the Scandinavians first reach Greenland?

Did anyone know the first settlement there vanished and the occupants died off, because they wouldn't interact with the natives to learn how to survive during the Freezing cold.

White people suck at trying to do things by themselves.

What about Spain, Argentina, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India, etc.?

The color of one's skin does not mean they'll make a good leader. Take a look at the majority of our presidents, they sucked out loud.

Africa only is a shithole mainly because America and Europe raped the land of any and all of its valuable natural resources, so now it's pretty much all dried up and gone. Nigeria is a very good area though.

You guys shouldn’t knock it. Apart from the whole poverty thing (well, duh)….life in Africa is far better than that in the West.

Much more chilled out, they’re not slaves to the watches of capitalism, well, not all of them.

At 8/18/06 09:38 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: You guys shouldn’t knock it. Apart from the whole poverty thing (well, duh)….life in Africa is far better than that in the West.

Much more chilled out, they’re not slaves to the watches of capitalism, well, not all of them.

Capitalism is a part of the reason why they are in poverty.

In order for someone to gain wealth, someone else must lose it.

At 8/18/06 09:40 PM, Anti_Noob wrote: In order for someone to gain wealth, someone else must lose it.

That’s assuming that there is a static amount of wealth in the world, which there is not.

At 8/18/06 09:40 PM, Anti_Noob wrote: Capitalism is a part of the reason why they are in poverty.

In order for someone to gain wealth, someone else must lose it.

Survival of the fittest. It's their own fault for not adapting in this modern world.

At 8/18/06 09:45 PM, Pwnage_In_A_Can wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:40 PM, Anti_Noob wrote:

Survival of the fittest. It's their own fault for not adapting in this modern world.

Yes except that humans are no longer connected to the rules of Darwanism.

At 8/18/06 09:46 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Yes except that humans are no longer connected to the rules of Darwanism.

Bullshit they aren't.

At 8/18/06 09:44 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:40 PM, Anti_Noob wrote: In order for someone to gain wealth, someone else must lose it.

That’s assuming that there is a static amount of wealth in the world, which there is not.

Partially true... but wealth still distributes across the world presenting and a cause and effect analysis in the economic association of distant countries.

If you trading was the main source of economic wealth for your country, then you would be affected by the economic decisions made by those other countries.

At 8/18/06 09:48 PM, Pwnage_In_A_Can wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:46 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Yes except that humans are no longer connected to the rules of Darwanism.

Bullshit they aren't.

Thats why mentally handicaped, physically handicaped, disease ridden, weak and inferm people live, produce and pass on thier weaker genetics.

At 8/18/06 09:50 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Thats why mentally handicaped, physically handicaped, disease ridden, weak and inferm people live, produce and pass on thier weaker genetics.

Someone should really rectify that problem. I say a little social engineering is in order.

At 8/18/06 09:48 PM, Pwnage_In_A_Can wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:46 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Yes except that humans are no longer connected to the rules of Darwanism.

Bullshit they aren't.

You want survival of the fittest? Stick a fat American and a fit African in a circus ring with a hungry lion, see who gets out alive.

What we have now is survival of the richest. Which is downright anti-Darwin.

At 8/18/06 09:48 PM, Pwnage_In_A_Can wrote:

At 8/18/06 09:46 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Yes except that humans are no longer connected to the rules of Darwanism.

Bullshit they aren't.

If the rules of darwanism were still connected to today with humans... then you would be dead, since you an inferior cretin and situated at the very bottom of the food chain... even lower than the plants.