Targets in the world.

[comedyguy91]

Ok, lets focus on the first part of the story: Targets attacked by terrorists, Red=Attacked, blue=Attack failed.

1st America in 2001 Newyork city september 11=Red: Killing hundreds operation of twin towers. In conclusion: Occupied pakistan for a few years, then lead to war.

2nd India 2005 Novmember=Red: Killing about 10-30 people operation of suicide bomb attacks by terrorists against the hindu's. Conclusion: Temporary battle, may lead to war.

3rd Isreal 2006 May=Red/blue: Killing half the people the terrorists planned to kill operation of takeover. In conclusion: War, Leading American's to help.

4th England 2006 August 10=Blue: Operation 2 plane crashes. But failed. Conclusion, England is cautious, Labtop's and ipod's are banned forever on plane's now. Why? Because a bomb was supposed to blow up by being detonated by a digital camera flash, with a juice bottle containing the bomb. A juice bottle contains a bomb!!!

Now. Lets review: WHO are the ones who conclude to violence? WHO atre the ones that killed thousands? And WHO is the one that starts the war? PAKISTAN AND IRAQ.

[HighlyIllogical]

Pakistan? No...the US occupied (and is STILL occupying) Afghanistan. Wrong country.

[comedyguy91]

No by the way PAKISTAN IS PART OF AFGANISTAN

[HighlyIllogical]

At 8/10/06 07:24 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: No by the way PAKISTAN IS PART OF AFGANISTAN

Since when?

Pervez Musharaf is the "president" (military dictator) of Pakistan, while Hamid Karzai is the President of Afghanistan.

[comedyguy91]

Considering its called a continet TOGETHER

[HighlyIllogical]

At 8/10/06 07:28 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: Considering its called a continet TOGETHER

Good BOY! They're both on the Asian continent! Good JOB!

Doesn't mean that they're the same country. That's like saying that South Korea is part of China. Which, naturally, it's not.

[drDAK]

At 8/10/06 07:21 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: Now. Lets review: WHO are the ones who conclude to violence? WHO atre the ones that killed thousands? And WHO is the one that starts the war? PAKISTAN AND IRAQ.

Lol, what did Iraq ever do?

[Athlas]

Well, I think Brussels would be alikely attack target, considering the amount of international government corporations headquarters located there, like the NATO.

[VigilanteNighthawk]

At 8/10/06 07:21 PM, comedyguy91 wrote:
Now. Lets review: WHO are the ones who conclude to violence? WHO atre the ones that killed thousands? And WHO is the one that starts the war? PAKISTAN AND IRAQ.

Your little list proves absolutely nothing about who is responsible for those attacks. In fact Pakistani officials helped stop the latest attempted plot in England.

FAIL.

[Engelsman]

At 8/10/06 07:21 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: 4thBritain 2006 August 10=Blue: Operation 2 plane crashes. But failed. Conclusion, Britain is cautious, Labtop's and ipod's are banned forever on plane's now. Why? Because a bomb was supposed to blow up by being detonated by a digital camera flash, with a juice bottle containing the bomb. A juice bottle contains a bomb!!!

i'll correct that to Britain before you get all the angry Scottish people

[bcdemon]

Going by this topic alone, It would appear that the average 27 year old american knows absolutely Jack-Shit about what is really happening. Someone get this guy a lifeline on some decent news sources, he's lost.

[drDAK]

At 8/11/06 09:12 AM, bcdemon wrote: Going by this topic alone, It would appear that the average 27 year old american knows absolutely Jack-Shit about what is really happening.

He's a 13 year old in disguise. Besides, the American media is so lost when it comes to unbiased information.

[Rockthebestmusic]

the american media generally puts out what sells rarely do they put out just the facts

[Blamitality]

American Media is extremely liberal crap who justs pastes words together and claims the story to be true. NO ONE IS TO DISAGREE WITH THAT

[mrshizel]

a bomb in a juice bottle?! can someone give me a link to read about this?

[ReiperX]

At 8/10/06 07:21 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: Ok, lets focus on the first part of the story: Targets attacked by terrorists, Red=Attacked, blue=Attack failed.

1st America in 2001 Newyork city september 11=Red: Killing hundreds operation of twin towers. In conclusion: Occupied pakistan for a few years, then lead to war.

Its New York City. They killed thousands not hundreds, I think it was a little over 3,000. We attacked Afganistan not Pakistan, they are different countries.

Now. Lets review: WHO are the ones who conclude to violence? WHO atre the ones that killed thousands? And WHO is the one that starts the war? PAKISTAN AND IRAQ.

Actually it was Al Queda, although some of the hatred towards the US does come from things that the US has done in the past, so technically there are no innocent sides, just innocent civillian casualties on both sides. Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terrorism, so I have no idea where you got Pakistan and Iraq from.

[Guitarmy]

At 8/10/06 07:24 PM, comedyguy91 wrote: No by the way PAKISTAN IS PART OF AFGANISTAN

Uh, Pakistan is part of India........

[Blamitality]

Actually it was Al Queda, although some of the hatred towards the US does come from things that the US has done in the past, so technically there are no innocent sides, just innocent civillian casualties on both sides. Iraq had nothing to do with the war on terrorism, so I have no idea where you got Pakistan and Iraq from.

First off, yes it was Afghanistan and Al Qaeda. And I do not recall ANYTHING that America has done wrong to spark AQ so...

[zendahl]

At 8/13/06 12:33 PM, Blamitality wrote: American Media is extremely liberal crap who justs pastes words together and claims the story to be true. NO ONE IS TO DISAGREE WITH THAT

I am going to have to disagree on part of this. True the media would never let the trueth get in the way of a good story, but it has nothing to do with liberal politics. You seem to think that liberal is synonimous with lie. It's not, but for some reason this seems to stick in a lot of peoples mind. I, for the record, am niether liberal or conservative. I fall in between. Liberals have nothing to do with the media though. The blame rests squarly on Mr. Nielson. Violence sells, sex sells, war sells, anything to get the better ratings, and trueth be damned.