Audio Portal Cleanup

[SadSpoon]

Welcome to the Audio Portal cleanup, a thread where you can post links to stolen audio. Submitting audio off someone else's CD hurts little Cambodian kids starving in a corner!

Well, maybe not that but lets face it this is a very evil thing to do.

Heres my link:
http://www.newground..536476&sub=46703

[Love-Hate-War]

you know theres already a thread for this...?

[<deleted>]

At 7/25/06 10:49 AM, Love_Hate_War wrote: you know theres already a thread for this...?

Apparently not >=(

[SadSpoon]

i searched for one but couldn't find one so i started my own
if you could post a link that would be great though

[JesusSaves]

It was on the 2nd page. Try harder.

[SadSpoon]

At 7/25/06 11:38 PM, -Steve- wrote: It was on the 2nd page. Try harder.

that is the Audio Forum Cleanup thread.
this is the Audio Portal Cleanup thread.
open your fucking eyes, jackass.

The Jerky Boys pwn all

[JesusSaves]

Please explain to me the necessity of creating a new thread, rather than just piggy-backing off a closely related pre-existing thread.

[SadSpoon]

Purpose of the Audio Forum Cleanup thread:
to allow users to help mods lock spam threads in the AF
Purpose of the Audio Portal Cleanup thread:
to allow users to help admins delete stolen audio from the AP

by golly you're right! they are similar! but would you post a link to stolen audio in the AF Cleanup thread?

[DJCityScape]

i think it's a good idea.

[SadSpoon]

At 7/26/06 03:41 AM, DJCityScape wrote: i think it's a good idea.

Glad to see people supporting this.

[JesusSaves]

At 7/26/06 12:25 AM, SadSpoon wrote: by golly you're right! they are similar! but would you post a link to stolen audio in the AF Cleanup thread?

My point was to simply combine the two threads, being similiar, rather than just create another one. I think that in the future, if this idea does work out, it wont be as confusing. I also think it will lead to the original thread being utilized more, making all of us AF regs happy campers.

[tedJohnston]

My point was to simply combine the two threads, being similiar, rather than just create another one. I think that in the future, if this idea does work out, it wont be as confusing. I also think it will lead to the original thread being utilized more, making all of us AF regs happy campers.

Umm, they're not related in any fashion. Spoon is talking about stolen audio, as in, someone ripping the latest Mint Royale CD, posting it up and saying, "L1ST3NZ 2 M3 1337s MUJ4X!!! L0L!!!"

[Arbiter]

How come at every sign of discussion and disagreement you people keep going more and more hostile?
It's just generally creating a bad enviroment.
If you're to flame each other, PM.

[tedJohnston]

Shut up Lvl 2 n00b. *slaps him* Did that help?

Just kidding XD ... Anyways, I think there's always room for disagreement no matter what, and if I sounded hostile, then my apologies ... I just think as long as it doesn't boil down to swearing and virtual bitch slapping, we're all good. ; )

[Love-Hate-War]

*bitchslaps ted*

lol joking, but yeh, i see your point, that was to do with the audio FORUM. So i guess this thread is a good idea, as apposed to hundreds of "THIS AUDIO IS STOLEN!!!" threads so yeh.

[Erkie]

There's a reason why this never worked the 2x someone tried to start it, I just don't remember the exact arguments.

The risk of them turning into flame wars is too high.

When people want attention from the moderators, they always make topics; by making topics, they are then adding clutter and giving the potential to ignite flame wars. Their response? FLAG IT. Don't go out in the open and propose it, just do it. We can't afford this on the verge of getting "revamped", the system is bound to change eventually, so don't initiate something you can't be responsible for.

This is especially for all the new regs, Spoon, War, etc: Observe before you take action. That's lesson one.

[Love-Hate-War]

At 7/26/06 04:41 PM, Erkie wrote: This is especially for all the new regs, Spoon, War, etc: Observe before you take action. That's lesson one.

War? Are you reffering to me? Observe my profile and you'll see im not a new reg ¬-¬

[SadSpoon]

ok ok guys from now on use this thread for what it was meant for or don't use it at all please. i see no reason for this to be a battleground.

[tedJohnston]

At 7/26/06 04:41 PM, Erkie wrote: There's a reason why this never worked the 2x someone tried to start it, I just don't remember the exact arguments.

The risk of them turning into flame wars is too high.

Well, I think this situation is different than the one you posted because the topic starter isn't a total nub. The reason this one got a little out of hand was because one guy misunderstood the premise of the topic and Spoon reacted a little harshly. And I guess I just fed the flames (no pun intended ... REALLY) after that. ; )

With that out of the way, this topic is a good idea and Spoon is right on the ball here. Let's make good use of this thread.

At 7/26/06 06:08 PM, SadSpoon wrote: ok ok guys from now on use this thread for what it was meant for or don't use it at all please. i see no reason for this to be a battleground.

[Erkie]

Well, I think this situation is different than the one you posted because the topic starter isn't a total nub.

Indeed he is; no posts, no music, no contribution to the thread or direction after it's creation, he just made it for the sake of making it, then another complete nub comes in and defends the topic for him, disintegrating into flamings.

But I have no problems in testing the concept. I think I was thinking of other instances of cleanup threads.

[SadSpoon]

At 7/27/06 03:28 AM, Erkie wrote: Indeed he is; no posts, no music, no contribution to the thread or direction after it's creation

well neither have you. and this thread isn't necessarily only for people who rake the AP for stolen audio. it's also for people who stumble across something completely out of the blue. i dont exactly spend big chunks of my valuable time looking for stolen audio, so i haven't found anything yet.

[DJCityScape]

will somebody post some possible stolen audio on here? please? i've been looking, andi haven't found anything yet, but i'm looking.

[tedJohnston]

At 7/27/06 08:40 PM, SadSpoon wrote:

At 7/27/06 03:28 AM, Erkie wrote: Indeed he is; no posts, no music, no contribution to the thread or direction after it's creation

well neither have you. and ...

He wasn't talking about you, he was talking about the nub in the example link he posted.

[Para-Noid]

right here im sure you can tell which one is.

http://newgrounds.co..128368&sub=20402

[SadSpoon]

At 7/28/06 05:00 AM, Perfect_PARANOiA wrote: right here im sure you can tell which one is.

http://newgrounds.co..128368&sub=20402

good job, PP! first post! have a cookie.

[Para-Noid]

At 7/28/06 09:04 PM, SadSpoon wrote:

At 7/28/06 05:00 AM, Perfect_PARANOiA wrote: right here im sure you can tell which one is.

http://newgrounds.co..128368&sub=20402

good job, PP! first post! have a cookie.

mmmm this cookie is Deliscous

i cant spell

[pitbulljones]

bollocks

[SadSpoon]

At 7/28/06 09:44 PM, pitbulljones wrote: bollocks

thank you.

[pitbulljones]

At 7/28/06 10:18 PM, SadSpoon wrote:

At 7/28/06 09:44 PM, pitbulljones wrote: bollocks

thank you.

you're welcome.

i'm only ripping mate, i admire the aspirations of this thread, hope it goes okay. im drunk tho so what do i know? BUT..... the audio forum cleanup does act as an AP clean up.....just thought i'd say. anyways when i spot summat i'll be sure t post here and in the af clean up too.,

[Noe3]

/bump

(at the bottom of the page approaching the pit of eternal-no-one-looks-at-it second page)