Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

but what about the 17 year old who have experience and knowledge, who also know when to give up when their wrong and learn something? what about them?

...but what about the 17 year old who have experience and knowledge

HA HA HA HA HA!

At 7/24/06 01:48 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: ...but what about the 17 year old who have experience and knowledge

HA HA HA HA HA!

my ability to make typos has nothing to do with my experience and/or knowledge.

At 7/24/06 01:51 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 01:48 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: ...but what about the 17 year old who have experience and knowledge

HA HA HA HA HA!

my ability to make typos has nothing to do with my experience and/or knowledge.

I wasn't referring to your typo rate or your spelling, mine is horrendous... what I meant was your statement was oxymoronic or paradoxical.

ive seen people that are 60 years old who never experienced anything that made them more knowledgable, and i have seen 6 year old who have learned more life lessons than 23 year olds. being older only means that you have had more time to experience things, not necesserily meaning that you DID experience them.

At 7/24/06 02:00 PM, natemasterbates wrote: ive seen people that are 60 years old who never experienced anything that made them more knowledgable, and i have seen 6 year old who have learned more life lessons than 23 year olds. being older only means that you have had more time to experience things, not necesserily meaning that you DID experience them.

Oh i agree....i've met people older than me that were allot stupider, and younger peeps that were allot smarter....

But generally speaking, there is a direct coalition between age and knowledge.

It's like cinema ratings. There are undoubtedly some 11 year olds who could handle an X-rated or an 18 certificate, but most wouldn't, and that’s why they exist.

At 7/23/06 08:12 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: "The only source of knowledge is experience." - Albert Einstein

I'm pretty sure he's referenceing trials but I'm not sure. No matter, I've never thought of einstein as much of a philosopher. Heeven argued against his own quantum physics theory. lmao.

Yes, because ALL 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 year olds have no political knowledge and are completely oblivious to the world around them.

13 year olds are a lot worse.

At 7/24/06 02:45 PM, Proud_American wrote: Yes, because ALL 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 year olds have no political knowledge and are completely oblivious to the world around them.

13 year olds are a lot worse.

I disliked it until I saw the bottom, now it's win.

At 7/24/06 02:45 PM, Proud_American wrote: Yes, because ALL 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 year olds have no political knowledge and are completely oblivious to the world around them.

13 year olds are a lot worse.

we really need t setup up a system of writing down *sarcasm* because it's too hard for me to handle when tallking about politics.

At 7/24/06 06:55 AM, x_Toadenalin_x wrote: What gets me is the following - someone makes a point. Someone rebutts with the fair argument that the topic starter is obviously some kind of remedial school dropout. The topic starter responds by saying "Well I have an IQ of <Insert some ludicrously high number>"

Que everyone telling everyone else that they have the best IQ. Funny thing is, everyone claims to be two or three standard deviations from the norm.

Either Politics is frequented by a group of geniuses who are only prevented from world domination by their curfew, or a bunch of extremely self-obsessed liars.

Has anyone else noticed this?

Yeah, unfortunately what you say is about 90% true. Usually when someone points out the topic starter is an uneducated moron, the topic starter will try to retort the person who says it fucks animals or is gay, and articulate it in really botched grammar. I can understand minimal mistakes, but there's a problem when someone spells you as "u."

Also, they ask why the person's being an asshole and its a freeboard to post questions. To which the person points out there's an Official Bush Topic and Proteas usually closes the rant topic.

At least, this is what I saw when I used to lurk here and decided to start posting. I do remember some kid saying they had an IQ of 212.

lewl

At 7/24/06 01:44 PM, natemasterbates wrote: but what about the 17 year old who have experience and knowledge, who also know when to give up when their wrong and learn something? what about them?

By your picture you look like your 14 years old.

At 7/24/06 04:08 PM, Goliath- wrote: By your picture you look like your 14 years old.

what is your point? im 17.

At 7/24/06 04:44 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:08 PM, Goliath- wrote: By your picture you look like your 14 years old.

what is your point? im 17.

God hates you.

At 7/24/06 04:48 PM, Der_Pandar wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:44 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:08 PM, Goliath- wrote: By your picture you look like your 14 years old.

what is your point? im 17.

God hates you.

Yup, but then again, he hates everyone....he made us look like monkeys....but less cute.

At 7/24/06 04:48 PM, Der_Pandar wrote: God hates you.

thats interesting, god(i assume your christian) probably does hate me.

At 7/24/06 04:50 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:48 PM, Der_Pandar wrote: God hates you.

thats interesting, god(i assume your christian) probably does hate me.

He hates all redheads.

At 7/24/06 04:50 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:48 PM, Der_Pandar wrote: God hates you.

thats interesting, god(i assume your christian) probably does hate me.

It's spelt with a "G" not a lowercase g. Get your puncuation right, son.

At 7/24/06 04:52 PM, PwnageInACan wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:50 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:48 PM, Der_Pandar wrote: God hates you.

thats interesting, god(i assume your christian) probably does hate me.

It's spelt with a "G" not a lowercase g. Get your puncuation right, son.

maybe he does the same as me, spell it 'god' to piss off the christians who get in a fluster ofer a letter.

At 7/24/06 04:56 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: maybe he does the same as me, spell it 'god' to piss off the christians who get in a fluster ofer a letter.

Yeah, but you usually post with correct grammar. There's no reason for you do fail to capitalize a simple word.

From his posts he doesn't use uppercase at all, which pisses me off because he says he's seventeen. In one more year he gets to decide who actually runs my country.

At 7/24/06 04:52 PM, PwnageInACan wrote: It's spelt with a "G" not a lowercase g. Get your puncuation right, son.

well, when i refer to christian god i use lowercase, im not going to give that false god the credit that he doesnt deserve.

At 7/24/06 05:00 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:52 PM, PwnageInACan wrote:

well, when i refer to christian god i use lowercase, im not going to give that false god the credit that he doesnt deserve.

Really? And I thought you were an uneducated moron. Judging from your posts I'm not that far off.

At 7/24/06 04:59 PM, PwnageInACan wrote: In one more year he gets to decide who actually runs my country.

YAY, i get to decide between one horrible rich guy and another horrible rich guy. who are most likely friends

capitilizing is a waste of time if i want to show that a new sentence is starting ill put a period before it, and capitalizing 'I' is pointless, there is not difference between 'I' and 'i'

At 7/24/06 05:04 PM, PwnageInACan wrote:

At 7/24/06 05:00 PM, natemasterbates wrote:

At 7/24/06 04:52 PM, PwnageInACan wrote:

well, when i refer to christian god i use lowercase, im not going to give that false god the credit that he doesnt deserve.

Really? And I thought you were an uneducated moron. Judging from your posts I'm not that far off.

Now you’re sounding like a zealous missionary who feels an overwhelming need to convert the savages.

At 7/24/06 05:00 PM, natemasterbates wrote: well, when i refer to christian god i use lowercase,

You do realize that the Jewish and Islamic God are the same as the Christian God right?

Its the same belief with different rules.

At 7/24/06 05:08 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: Now you’re sounding like a zealous missionary who feels an overwhelming need to convert the savages.

Couldn't be. I haven't said he was going to hell yet.

At 7/24/06 05:11 PM, PwnageInACan wrote:

At 7/24/06 05:08 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: Now you’re sounding like a zealous missionary who feels an overwhelming need to convert the savages.

Couldn't be. I haven't said he was going to hell yet.

Touché.

At 7/23/06 03:20 PM, Der_Pandar wrote:

::

I guess my point is that I hate them, and they need to chill out. At least the majority of the people on this forum that I would consider 'regulars' - HighlyIllogical included - make a post that invites alternate points of view and, for the most part, maturely refutes them while conceding that some people have more experience with the subject. These kids, you try to tell them anything, you're an idiot and part of the system that doesn't recognize their understated brilliance on something like Late Archean Fossil Geology.

Aah fuck, just when I thought I was getting a little bit of respect around here I find out I have to wait another four years until my opinions are given any thought.

At 7/24/06 05:24 PM, White_hole wrote: Aah fuck, just when I thought I was getting a little bit of respect around here I find out I have to wait another four years until my opinions are given any thought.

Sorry my man. I hate to tell you this, but you also have to move to America and wait four years. Then we'll take you seriously.

At 7/24/06 05:24 PM, White_hole wrote: Aah fuck, just when I thought I was getting a little bit of respect around here I find out I have to wait another four years until my opinions are given any thought.

Get out of here, we hate fourteen year olds.