Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/22/06 01:42 AM, Monocrom wrote: She's 12.

Being part of a simulated, horrific rape scene is still going to fuck with her mind.

i don't think it will. even without the absurd amount of psychiatrists, grief counselors, rape counselors, acting coaches and consoling parents, she seems like a smart girl who knows the difference between the movie and rape. even if she doesn't, all of the aforementioned people will make SURE she does.

At 7/22/06 02:02 AM, Jerrinatah wrote: Lets all hit it together

I'd like to hit you......... with a shovel.

At 7/22/06 02:01 AM, Monocrom wrote:

Okay, let's say you met a really mature and intelligent 12 year-old. She liked you and said you could do her. She's mature for her age, would you go for it?

If you did, do you honestly think you WOULDN'T become a convicts personal fuck toy?

Okay. I think you are completely missing the point here.

I said she's smart enough to know the difference between a STAGED rape scene, in a safe environment on a movie set, and a REAL rape.

Saying that I would rape a 12 year old because she's intelligent has nothing to do with this topic.

Jeeze.

At 7/22/06 12:59 AM, Acid-Rain wrote: I'm not i could think of anyone who would rape at girl that young...

That wold be retarded, shes like 5 isn't she?

12

At 7/22/06 02:05 AM, Patchco wrote: Saying that I would rape a 12 year old because she's intelligent has nothing to do with this topic.

Jeeze.

I didn't say you would, I ASKED if you would.

Okay.

Haha.

Well, if she said "you can do me", I guess that's not 'rape' now is it? haha.

But nah, I wouldn't been hanging out with a 12 year old to begin with lmao.

At 7/22/06 02:04 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:02 AM, Jerrinatah wrote: Lets all hit it together

I'd like to hit you......... with a shovel.

Why is that black boy?

Yay, we get to see itty bitty titties.

At 7/22/06 02:08 AM, Jerrinatah wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:04 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:02 AM, Jerrinatah wrote: Lets all hit it together

I'd like to hit you......... with a shovel.

Why is that black boy?

1- You know why!

2- I'm White.

At 7/22/06 01:28 AM, NeoSoviet wrote:

They think we don`t understand how tought it is ? Fucking assholes, the mother and the agent AND Dakota should be castrated, shot 20 times ressurected and impaled in huge elefant dicks.

how do you castrate a twelve year old girl?

It's child abuse all around.

At 7/22/06 12:38 AM, HeinousDude wrote: Now that I got your attention...
Guess how many people'll watch this.

I say it's just like Britney posing naked when she's desperate, only Dakota sucks so much she has to do it this early. Strangely, I actually think her acting was okay in War of the Worlds.

My pocket full of cents:

Children being raped is an unfortunate but very realistic part of life. Having it captured in a movie wouldn't be easy to watch, but movies paint pictures of the good, bad, and the ugly. Movies aren't necessarily always meant to be entertaining thrillrides, some make you think, some change your life, and some open your eyes. Dakota Fanning has proved herself to be an excellent actress thus far, and pretty brilliant in her young age. I think they made an excellent casting decision, personally.

On a side note, one of the main factors everyone seems to be missing is the fact that this is a 'movie'. Meaning, this is Dakota Fanning 'acting'. What's the big deal? Because she's 12? Get over it, and move on - either watch it, or don't. If you're going to create a film about a child who's been dealt a really shitty hand of cards, you might as well get supreme realism from a girl who operates on a higher mental level - rather than scouting out the world's youngest looking 18 year old. Who, by the way, is bound to have terrible acting abilities, thereby turning the film into a low-class flop of a B flick.

It's that simple. Most of you need to develop your own opinions and stop clinging onto the more popular ends of discussions, simply because you're afraid of what people may think of you.

At 7/22/06 02:33 AM, Stamper wrote:

It's that simple. Most of you need to develop your own opinions and stop clinging onto the more popular ends of discussions, simply because you're afraid of what people may think of you.

I think the biggest beef I have with this is that it's going to be something pedophiles can jerk off to. We're already crossing the line with miniskirts and thongs for kids. Instead of awarding those pedos shouldn't we be giving them therapy?

At 7/22/06 02:12 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:08 AM, Jerrinatah wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:04 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:02 AM, Jerrinatah wrote: Lets all hit it together

I'd like to hit you......... with a shovel.

Why is that black boy?

1- You know why!

2- I'm White.

Is it because of my posts poking fun at pedophilism?

On the internet we are all black

At 7/22/06 02:33 AM, Stamper wrote: It's that simple. Most of you need to develop your own opinions and stop clinging onto the more popular ends of discussions, simply because you're afraid of what people may think of you.

Often times, my opinions are quite unpopular. And, I catch a lot of $#^t because of that. This is one time that my opinion happens to be the popular one. While you do have a point that some 12 year-olds are very mature, there is a limit as to how mature a 12 year-old can be. There are a lot of 18 and 19 year-olds who LOOK several years younger than they really are. (Mostly because of a younger-looking face and short height for their age). Chances are, a few of them have some acting talent.

At 7/22/06 02:37 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

Instead of awarding those pedos shouldn't we be giving them therapy?

we should line them all up on a big wall and shoot them all. tell me one good reason that pedophiles should be kept alive. just one. and don't tell me that they can be productive members of society, ANYONE can do that. it's not like we would have 6 billion other people to choose from. fuck therapy. fuck society's "save everyone" mentality. some people are nothing but firewood, and should not be treated like they need to be saved. with the money that would be spent having one pedophile "recover" we could feed every child in a public school for a week. now for every pedophile we save we are starving hundreds of children. in countries where people literally live in trash dumps because there is no room for them anywhere else, not to mention money, they are simply allowed to die. these aren't bad people, simply unfortunate. now for every pedophile we waste our time "saving" we could LITERALLY feed hundreds of children for weeks, or better yet move them here where we have the time, room, and money to keep pervs like child molesters and wastes of flesh like mindless zombie children living on incubators for their 9 year lives alive.

think about our priorities. should making pedophiles learn their lesson the hard, long, expensive, pointless way really be one of them?

pointless mostly off topic rant/

At 7/22/06 02:45 AM, tom3rulz wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:37 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

Instead of awarding those pedos shouldn't we be giving them therapy?

we should line them all up on a big wall and shoot them all.

For $3.75 you can get a small box of 50, .22 caliber rounds of ammunition.

I suck at math, so I don't know what that translates into for just one round......

But it's still a lot more $$$ than what a pedophile's life is worth.

At 7/22/06 12:59 AM, Acid-Rain wrote: I'm not i could think of anyone who would rape at girl that young...

That wold be retarded, shes like 5 isn't she?

She's 12.

At 7/22/06 02:50 AM, Monocrom wrote: For $3.75 you can get a small box of 50, .22 caliber rounds of ammunition.

I suck at math, so I don't know what that translates into for just one round......

But it's still a lot more $$$ than what a pedophile's life is worth.

that's 7.5 cents apiece. so basically you're paying 5 cents for the fun of shooting them, and the 2.5 cent fee for their next to worthless life. in fact the human body, in raw materials, is only worth 32 cents. so i would turn a profit scrapping their corpses...

after about 1000 pedophiles i will have payed for my gun... or i can use one of my swords and make a profit right away. it's a brilliant business plan.

At 7/22/06 02:50 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:45 AM, tom3rulz wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:37 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

Instead of awarding those pedos shouldn't we be giving them therapy?

we should line them all up on a big wall and shoot them all.

For $3.75 you can get a small box of 50, .22 caliber rounds of ammunition.

I suck at math, so I don't know what that translates into for just one round......

But it's still a lot more $$$ than what a pedophile's life is worth.

I agree. Pedophiles should be castrated. Or stapled and sewn shut, whatever the case may be.

or if you can think of a more painful way of stopping them, be my guest.

At 7/22/06 02:54 AM, tom3rulz wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:50 AM, Monocrom wrote: For $3.75 you can get a small box of 50, .22 caliber rounds of ammunition.

I suck at math, so I don't know what that translates into for just one round......

But it's still a lot more $$$ than what a pedophile's life is worth.

that's 7.5 cents apiece. so basically you're paying 5 cents for the fun of shooting them, and the 2.5 cent fee for their next to worthless life. in fact the human body, in raw materials, is only worth 32 cents. so i would turn a profit scrapping their corpses...

32 cents? You can get quite a bit of more $$$ for human organs on the Black market. In some countries, people are so poor that they volunteer to sell a kidney.

Maybe in 200 years, the practice of shooting pedophiles and harvesting their organs to save the lives of folks who aren't worthless, will become an accepted practice.

At 7/22/06 12:38 AM, HeinousDude wrote: Strangely, I actually think her acting was okay in War of the Worlds.

You can't be serious.

At 7/22/06 03:04 AM, -Kappa- wrote:

At 7/22/06 12:38 AM, HeinousDude wrote: Strangely, I actually think her acting was okay in War of the Worlds.

You can't be serious.

fuck i'd be crying too if i had to depend on tom cruise to save my life

At 7/22/06 03:06 AM, _Ace_ wrote:

At 7/22/06 03:04 AM, -Kappa- wrote:

At 7/22/06 12:38 AM, HeinousDude wrote: Strangely, I actually think her acting was okay in War of the Worlds.

You can't be serious.

fuck i'd be crying too if i had to depend on tom cruise to save my life

I'd have an orgasm if Tom Cruise was saving my life.

Oh, this is good:

"It's not just the rape scene - the whole story is challenging Dakota as an actress," Fanning's longtime agent, Osbrink, told me. "And I've never been so proud of her in my life. I've seen the dailies, and in every scene she gets better and better."

*cough*Pedo*cough*

At 7/22/06 02:37 AM, HeinousDude wrote:

At 7/22/06 02:33 AM, Stamper wrote:

It's that simple. Most of you need to develop your own opinions and stop clinging onto the more popular ends of discussions, simply because you're afraid of what people may think of you.

I think the biggest beef I have with this is that it's going to be something pedophiles can jerk off to. We're already crossing the line with miniskirts and thongs for kids. Instead of awarding those pedos shouldn't we be giving them therapy?

Nah bro, pedophiles will be pedophiles. So a few creepy dudes will pull out their dicks and rub out a quick one. Who cares? If the movie doesn't get released, they'd simply resort to their collection, or alternatively, the filthy underbelly of the Internet. That argument has no significance, as it could be applied to any individual with a fucked up alternate lifestyle in relation to the subject matter of an upcoming film. Granted, child abuse is a taboo subject, but again....you shouldn't halt production of a potentially amazing film due to a handful of fucked up people.

Also, if the movie is a success, I say give em' all kinds of awards for that brave shit. I doubt the director 'Deborah Kampmeier' is producing this film with devious personal intentions, to deliver it to a secret clan of underground child pornographers. Give me a break and open up your mind. You act like the entire film crew is producing this film with hard dicks and wet pussies.

Additionally, I figured this topic was created to gather everyone's general thoughts in relation to a young actress playing a surprising role, and not 'how we should kill psychos that fuck children'. Not that I support pedophiles, but christ, stay on topic. Theres no need to upgrade your digital nobility bar by suggesting we shoot dudes who spill their balls to pictures of underdeveloped tits.

At 7/22/06 12:50 AM, TheChaosDemon wrote: I hope we get to see her titties.

what titties?

perv

yeah! finally!

At 7/22/06 03:11 AM, Stamper wrote: Additionally, I figured this topic was created to gather everyone's general thoughts in relation to a young actress playing a surprising role, and not 'how we should kill psychos that fuck children'. Not that I support pedophiles, but christ, stay on topic. Theres no need to upgrade your digital nobility bar by suggesting we shoot dudes who spill their balls to pictures of underdeveloped tits.

Shit....... I don't care about the ones who only use pictures. It's the predatory pedophiles who actively go out to rape children and even babies; those are the ones who deserve to be shot.

omg