Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I can always count on you to back me up harsh. What do you think though standard or nucular?

Its pointless to say that we aren't going to go through with the war, when obviously we are. but what do you think the outcome will be. Do you think that other countries will turn on us for beating up other countries. Or do ytou think they will join in. Dispite bush's actions. Wish we could all just settle this damn thing but as humans we can't.

At 2/20/03 03:47 PM, Jax_Cross wrote: Its pointless to say that we aren't going to go through with the war, when obviously we are. but what do you think the outcome will be. Do you think that other countries will turn on us for beating up other countries. Or do ytou think they will join in. Dispite bush's actions. Wish we could all just settle this damn thing but as humans we can't.

We're the superpower, so I doubt many people will retaliate against us or just walk away. However, I do think the opinion of America will change after this war, especially with the French and the Germans. Not that it matters, I don't even like the French if for nothing more than their position on Iraq being based solely on oil deals. I don't think we'll be launching nukes into Baghdad, though. Sorry.

indeed, i do see your point on the subject

Again another change in topic. What are the peoples fews of U.S. military in the middle East. SUch as occupation, no fly zones, installations in turkey. And any solutions to any of it. post if you'd like

We've had some amount of military presence around the world for a long time now. It doesn't really bother me at all that we have some in the middle east. As for Turkey getting cold feet about letting us use them as a springboard for the Iraq war, I feel it's well within their rights to do that. It's odd that they let us use bases there but not in the event of War, though. Eh, you can never really figure out some of those countries over there.

At 2/20/03 03:15 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: UK, Spain, Italy, and Israel all support the war, the other countries could learn a lesson from them about what it means to be an ally...

Thats four countries out of how many? At least 160 at the last count...

UK, Spain, Italy, and Israel all support the war,

Only four of the 15 UN Security Council support a war, 4 are opposed and the rest would abstain. You need nine to win.

the other countries could learn a lesson from them about what it means to be an ally...

Yeah, America should teach them! Like how in WW2 they rushed to Europe's aid as soon as Poland was attacked, or how they actively supported Iraq's actions in the 80s then tricked them into an war.

At 2/22/03 02:27 PM, Slizor wrote:

UK, Spain, Italy, and Israel all support the war,

Only four of the 15 UN Security Council support a war, 4 are opposed and the rest would abstain. You need nine to win.

Yeah. We won't get the nine.

At 2/20/03 02:00 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: You're 14, your opinions doesn't matter because you don't know shit. Deal?

And the only thing you know about IS shit.
By the way, when you do have a war with iraq, you're going to be shot by a one armed blind iraqi.

There is no extent to how full of shit you are, stupid redneck.

So only four are for war. Thats good to hear. How long will this little war last if it happens. estimated, and do you think that we will "relieve" sadaam of his power

At 2/22/03 02:27 PM, Slizor wrote:

UK, Spain, Italy, and Israel all support the war,

Only four of the 15 UN Security Council support a war, 4 are opposed and the rest would abstain. You need nine to win.

You also got to remember that three of the countries with a veto (Russia, France and China) are against the war. They could veto it without problem.

At 2/20/03 10:03 AM, Jax_Cross wrote: What does the general public think of bush and the war. Just your opinion, i'm not supporting either one nor am i not supporting it. just would like to know what the rest of the people on newgrounds thinks of this particular situation. Feel free to put your views

I think Bush really enjoyes the idea of a war and the death of hundreds of thousands of "non-americans".....
If I could write some1 "impotant" about the worth of peace, I would write it 2 Bush.....NOT Saddam, at least not first.....
Besides, in my opinion, those "proves" suck hard.....
like, "oh, a truck....MUST b a bomb!"

At 2/20/03 03:57 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:

At 2/20/03 03:47 PM, Jax_Cross wrote:

We're the superpower, so I doubt many people will retaliate against us or just walk away. However, I do think the opinion of America will change after this war, especially with the French and the Germans. Not that it matters, I don't even like the French if for nothing more than their position on Iraq being based solely on oil deals. I don't think we'll be launching nukes into Baghdad, though. Sorry.

So, is a military superpower worth more than any other country? About Bush, I'd like 2 say that he and Blair (And Saddam, why not?)are boys with toys....This time, the toys r too big, though...

At 2/22/03 01:26 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:

At 2/20/03 03:15 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: UK, Spain, Italy, and Israel all support the war, the other countries could learn a lesson from them about what it means to be an ally...

If they r your aliies, that doesn't mean that u could deside about a war completely on your own....
If I were Tony Blair, I'd take my tongue out of Bush's ass...

At 2/22/03 07:02 PM, Jax_Cross wrote: So only four are for war. Thats good to hear.

I think you're wrong if u think Bush cares if no-one else liked the idea of a war....I think the countries that believe there should b no superpowers should try 2 make Bush agree.....1 man has no right 2 rule the world, no matter where does he (or she)live or in what position is he...(or she)

Never post again, we're all stupider after reading your replies.