A UN of our own.

[Oblivia]

After learning what's happening in Iraq and watching a Che Guavara docu-drama, I though of a revolutionary idea. What if the United States were to make a United Nation of it's own consisting of all the nations of the continets of North and South America rather than just in the regular UN. Europe is doing it, so why not we do it? We can give freedom to the people of those nations from thier tyrants and over-powering drug lords. Now that's a war for freedom, and maybe we might not have to! There's a chance that we might not have to put up with any more of those stupid border problems.

This might be a good name for it: The United Continetal Nations of American, or UCNA.

The UCNA can deal with the problems in our continets while Europe, Asia, and Africa can deal with their own problems (unless someone from those continets were to attack such as that bastard Bin Laden) and we can still have hold those defense treaties for countries like Japan.

[Neoptolemus]

Hmm... This seems to remind me of NAFTA

[rainmaker]

Problem is, other countries don't have the resources to deal with thier own problems.
Darfur. Hunger. AIDS. Economic dependence. Need I say more?

It's a good idea, but there are too many problems in the world for almost any country, acting on its own behalf, to solve its own problems.

[Oblivia]

Economically so, but this time with South America added in it and with more free enterprise.

[Oblivia]

At 7/9/06 02:43 PM, _rainmaker_ wrote: Problem is, other countries don't have the resources to deal with thier own problems.
Darfur. Hunger. AIDS. Economic dependence. Need I say more?

It's a good idea, but there are too many problems in the world for almost any country, acting on its own behalf, to solve its own problems.

Ignore the last post, I forgot to qoute it.

What I'm saying is that in the Europe Unification, they support each other. So the UCNA will help out the misfortuned nations with aid reformation from tyranny and expand the NAFTA system to a whole new level therefore provide jobs for the homeless and the starving.

[rainmaker]

At 7/9/06 02:49 PM, Oblivia wrote: What I'm saying is that in the Europe Unification, they support each other. So the UCNA will help out the misfortuned nations with aid reformation from tyranny and expand the NAFTA system to a whole new level therefore provide jobs for the homeless and the starving.

But we do that already.

[Jayemare]

Spend billions or trillions to help countries that by and large hate us. I don't think so.

[rockizzy]

At 7/9/06 02:31 PM, Oblivia wrote: After learning what's happening in Iraq and watching a Che Guavara docu-drama, I though of a revolutionary idea. What if the United States were to make a United Nation of it's own consisting of all the nations of the continets of North and South America rather than just in the regular UN. Europe is doing it, so why not we do it? We can give freedom to the people of those nations from thier tyrants and over-powering drug lords. Now that's a war for freedom, and maybe we might not have to! There's a chance that we might not have to put up with any more of those stupid border problems.

i dont even know where to start... first of all: what does che guevara have to do with your weird idea?! and what do you mean by "europe is doing it"?! europe never formed a "united nations of their own". the EU was formed for economic reasons, to make trade easier between the european nations. it doesnt consist of ALL european nations, by the way. the "regular" UN was formed to prevent another world war from happening, and to promote greater understanding between the nations of the world. all of them. UNITED NATIONS, get it? and then in your weird "new" united nations of "your own", which nations are you talking about that need to have freedom been given to them? you know, there are some democratic countries down there. and for the ones that really have dictatorships: how are you gonna "give freedom" to them? wrap freedom up in a nice gift box and send condy rice down there to hand it over?! and once theyve gotten their freedom, will they automatically get rich and have a better economy? or why exaclty are the border problems gonna stop?

[ImmoralLibertarian]

Do you honestly think the increasing number of left wing powers in SA would have ANYTHING to do with the US?

You guys are like the boogie-man to them.

[JoS]

Because the Eu shares things in common that the US and well the rest of the world dont, not to mention the maerivcas.

[Oblivia]

Oh for the love...! How hard did you guy's heads hit the floor when you guys were little kids? Jeez, you guys made yourselves look like politically-retarded idiots. Okay, I'll make it easier for your backwards minds.

I got this idea from Europe when they started to form a union.

So I thought it would be a good idea if all the countries of North and South America were to form a union of their own in hope to remove the spread of tyranny of horrible dictators and extremely powerful drug lords.

Then UCNA (United Continental Nations of America, I name I'm using as a example) can help reform the misfortuned nation so that the people living there could have better lives and then later result into a better economy.

Now do you understand?

[Memorize]

You can't spell Unethical without UN.

I don't think the UN is that bad...it just has it's rough spots. I just think they owe a lot more to the US than they give considering that the US makes up most of their stuff.

[JoS]

For one there is no logical reason for the United states to enter into a decision making body similar to that of the EU for the Americas to get out dictators or drug lords. he can already do that without giving up any ground and has done so for years. For soemthign liek that to work the US woudl have to be prepared to consider tiself an equal to that of Cuba, Chile or Peru, and there is no nation the US currently would ever consider being equal to.

Second the Eu was formed because all coutnries involve are similar in socio-economic terms and political make-up. The US is far richer than Mexico or any latin American country and even richer than Canada. This imbalance would ultimatley lead to rpoblems. The US would never want to adopt a common currency because its currency value would take a hit.

[Oblivia]

At 7/9/06 09:21 PM, JoS wrote: For one there is no logical reason for the United states to enter into a decision making body similar to that of the EU for the Americas to get out dictators or drug lords. he can already do that without giving up any ground and has done so for years. For soemthign liek that to work the US woudl have to be prepared to consider tiself an equal to that of Cuba, Chile or Peru, and there is no nation the US currently would ever consider being equal to.

Second the Eu was formed because all coutnries involve are similar in socio-economic terms and political make-up. The US is far richer than Mexico or any latin American country and even richer than Canada. This imbalance would ultimatley lead to rpoblems. The US would never want to adopt a common currency because its currency value would take a hit.

Desite of youralmost unreadable mispellings, finally someone actually made a decent opinion about this idea, unlike the ones that were most likely made by jerk-headed middle schoolers.

[White-hole]

At 7/10/06 05:40 PM, Oblivia wrote:

Desite of youralmost unreadable mispellings, finally someone actually made a decent opinion about this idea, unlike the ones that were most likely made by jerk-headed middle schoolers.

Your new so its not a good idea to piss everyone off the minute you arrive by calling them jerk-headed middle schoolers.

[rockizzy]

At 7/10/06 05:40 PM, Oblivia wrote: Desite of youralmost unreadable mispellings, finally someone actually made a decent opinion about this idea, unlike the ones that were most likely made by jerk-headed middle schoolers.

instead of being too lazy to reply to all the other posts, you should state what youre so pissed about in regard to the posts, instead of acting like a jerk headed middle schooler yourself.

[JoS]

At 7/10/06 05:40 PM, Oblivia wrote: Desite of youralmost unreadable mispellings,

Spelling, grammar and proper punctuations only matter when you're new. Once you have beena round for years and have earned respect of your peers all that matters is that people can understand what you type. I occasionally miss a key or hit a key in the wrong order, that doesnt make me dumb, maybe lazy, but Ive paid my dues to be able to make such mistakes.

[Inglor]

You know... the US stands for United States, we did that sort of union hundreds of years ago, and the US is still willing to do it with any country in the area that's economically stable enough and has a similar political agenda.

[JakeHero]

At 7/10/06 11:50 PM, JoS wrote:

At 7/10/06 05:40 PM, Oblivia wrote: Desite of youralmost unreadable mispellings,

Spelling, grammar and proper punctuations only matter when you're new. Once you have beena round for years and have earned respect of your peers

Don't know what you're talking about. I have no respect for ya. :D

But usually when a person starts the whole "Your grammar, spelling, punctuation sucks insults it's because they don't have anything valid to counter the original points with.

[Hamslice]

And be in cahoots with the mexicans? I say no. :D

[Guitarmy]

At 7/9/06 02:31 PM, Oblivia wrote: After learning what's happening in Iraq and watching a Che Guavara docu-drama, I though of a revolutionary idea. What if the United States were to make a United Nation of it's own consisting of all the nations of the continets of North and South America rather than just in the regular UN.

We made the U.N. jackass.