At 7/1/06 12:58 AM, -Abaxion- wrote:
You realize that if your post had any meaning what so ever, that it's just going to be ignored.
I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with Ignoring. But first, I'm going to jump ahead a bit and talk in general terms about how Ignoring often uses the phrase, "Studies show that...", to introduce statements that wind up being chiefly about ideology, hunch, or preference. Then, I'll back up and fill in some of the details. Okay, so to start with the general stuff, if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, the thought that someone, somewhere, might condemn Ignoring's criminal ineptitude is anathema to it. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, unlike Ignoring, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- it were not actually responsible for trying to break down age-old institutions and customs, then I'd stop saying that I've known some nitwits who were impressively inarticulate. However, Ignoring is muddleheaded, and that trumps inarticulate every time. Ignoring proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other illiberal mattoids' intentions. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. A few days ago, Ignoring actually admitted that it wants to defile the air and water in the name of profit. Can you believe that? Perhaps Ignoring forgot to take its antipsychotics that day. An additional clue is that if it can one day place childish slumlords at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy, then the long descent into night is sure to follow.
For the moment, Ignoring makes no secret of the fact that it knows how to lie. It's too bad it doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. If we don't remove the Ignoring threat now, it will bite us in our backside in a lustrum or two. If Ignoring has any children, I recommend that it teach them about love, trust, cooperation, community, reason, negotiation, and compromise rather than violence, paranoia, and fear. Although Ignoring has managed to avoid indictment, or even a consensus that it did anything illegal, its methods are much subtler now than ever before. It is more adept at hidden mind control and its techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. All this aside, as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Ignoring's patsies don't really care that we can divide its grievances into three categories: grumpy, morally questionable, and stingy.
If, today, the urge of Ignoring's war-soul can prompt it to incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-treacherous Ignoring of tomorrow. The great irony is that Ignoring seems to have recently added the word "theoanthropomorphism" to its otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose it intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that if anything, I overheard one of its confreres say, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to help others to see through the empty and meaningless statements uttered by Ignoring and its lieutenants. If you think about it you'll see that Ignoring's vapid contrivances are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Ignoring's advocates are continuing their quiet work of advancing Ignoring's real goal, which is to make a mockery of the term "psychotherapeutical".
Ignoring slaps its message of self-pitying heathenism on everything that stands still -- newspapers, magazines, billboards, movies, op-eds, and grant proposals. Am I aware of how Ignoring will react when it reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because the hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to drive off and disperse the laughable slobs who make people weak and dependent.
Ignoring contends that it can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion and that, therefore, character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces sleazy, gloomy low-lifes (as distinct from the lewd, cold-blooded hellions who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that tribalism is a noble goal. In reality, contrariwise, Ignoring's lalochezia is downright annoying. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that what I call paltry cadgers often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Ignoring enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever it threatens to cause an increase in disease, irreligionism, crime, and vice.