Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

And people have the remarks, "God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" and crap like that, and that if there is gay marriage, civillazation will cease to exist because of no reproduction, and that's bull! If gay marriage is allowed, not everyone will automatically turn gay. Geez...

Ban divorce altogether. Then we'll see just how many people would be in an all-fired hurry to get married.

At 6/29/06 11:50 AM, capncrunch537 wrote: If gay marriage is allowed, not everyone will automatically turn gay. Geez...

Or maybe they know that the population in the closet is very high, maybe they themselves are?

Yeah probably. So who's with me?

I don't support it

you ghey

Well you suck. Anyone?

my state allows it.

Seriously though, how does it effect you if 2 gays get married? It doesnt. So all these super christion/anti-gay people should worry about something more important that actually effects them. Like the economy.

Also, note, that while I do approve of homosexuality, transgenderism etc. Basicly any sexual orientation where no-one gets harmed (not hurt, as subs enjoy getting hurt, and I also approve of the S&M culture) and no-one is forced into anything, beyond their understanding;

I do not really approve of the overly capitlaist gay culture. Like, here in Finland, one of the prominent publicly gay people, Teuvo Loman, I do feel sympathy and solidarity to him when he had to moe to a different part of Helsinki after he had recieved death threats, but still, I don't like the guy, because he supported the Conservative presidential candidate in the last elections.

Ha ha, at first I read "I support gay fights". But then I read it right, and then it wasn´t that fun anymore... Yeah... u know... :(

At 6/29/06 11:52 AM, Maus wrote: Ban divorce altogether.

That would be a laugh.

As for gay marriage. I am for it, the gay persons lover has a right to share their life in financial and legal arenas.

Furthermore, gay couples have to adopt if they want children. Straight couples can produce them and even if they feel sympathy for orphans, preffer to carry on their bloodline.

Hence, not only would I say that gay marriage is moral, but I would say that it is needed.

Yes, for less orphans, and children with homes!! People get it now!!

what you mean is, soon you're coming out of the closet

I agree with everything else exept for the jokes . Why no gay jokes ? Jokes make fun of people , mexicans , christians , gays , retards , everyone . Im not a racist , but jokes make and will always make fun of everyone . Thats why their funny .

At 6/29/06 09:52 AM, capncrunch537 wrote: I mean, all the straights will probably find true love

true love doesn't exist any more.

it's all "LOL SHE'S FIT" fuck. fuck. fuck. Father leaves. Mother is left to bring up yet another chav who will do the same.

At 6/29/06 12:05 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:

At 6/29/06 11:52 AM, Maus wrote: Ban divorce altogether.

That would be a laugh.

Until they do that, I'll continue to view the shrill debate over civil unions/marriage as a farce. People, that as a whole can't even keep the vows that they are privileged to take have no business telling others what marriage is meant to be.

Elton John is married to a woman and has a son with her. Shut up.

Fags rock, I'm all for it.

At 6/29/06 01:20 PM, Maus wrote: Until they do that, I'll continue to view the shrill debate over civil unions/marriage as a farce. People, that as a whole can't even keep the vows that they are privileged to take have no business telling others what marriage is meant to be.

I'm completley with you there. My mother doesn't agree with homosexual marriages, but my father couldn't keep his first vow, so it is odd.

Or! We could keep making gay jokes.

it's legal in Britain, Fuck you George Bush

And im VERY SORRY about having to do this but AMERICA IS FUCKING GAY!!!!! (sos)

At 6/29/06 01:26 PM, H_A_X_O_R_Z wrote: AMERICA IS FUCKING GAY!!!!!

Westboro Baptist Church agrees with you there.

man, gays dont bother me its just when they are over the top, wearing tight ,short ,leather pants .now that pisses me off

At 6/29/06 01:30 PM, scorpiontiki wrote: man, gays dont bother me its just when they are over the top, wearing tight ,short ,leather pants .now that pisses me off

So you dislike queens, but not homosexuals.

I'd imagine that most homosexuals hate queens.

At 6/29/06 01:32 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:

At 6/29/06 01:30 PM, scorpiontiki wrote: man, gays dont bother me its just when they are over the top, wearing tight ,short ,leather pants .now that pisses me off

So you dislike queens, but not homosexuals.

I'd imagine that most homosexuals hate queens.

Yeah, it does get irratating when they get all in your face about it.

At 6/29/06 01:33 PM, Masteronin wrote: Yeah, it does get irratating when they get all in your face about it.

I think they are harmful for the reputation of homosexuals.

Yeah. Not a lot of gays dress like that. Basically, I just want the term "gay" terminated. So gay marriage wouldn't be such a big deal and everything. Anyone else?

At 6/29/06 10:49 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:

At 6/29/06 10:46 AM, Fantum wrote:
That's your definition, and I have my own as well.

Really? And that would be?

The binding of a man and a woman together, not necesarily out of love.
There, we all have our own definitions. If you disagree, then tell me why your definition is the only definition.

I'm really not disagreeing or agreeing. That's my definition. Let' s see what Webster thinks.
The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
The state of being married; wedlock.
A common-law marriage.
A union between two persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage: a same-sex marriage.
A wedding.
A close union: “the most successful marriage of beauty and blood in mainstream comics” (Lloyd Rose).
Games. The combination of the king and queen of the same suit, as in pinochle.
Pretty much true, you can marry and lot love the other person, but I was saying love is usually why people decide to marry.

At 6/29/06 01:34 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:

At 6/29/06 01:33 PM, Masteronin wrote: Yeah, it does get irratating when they get all in your face about it.

I think they are harmful for the reputation of homosexuals.

Much like straight people don't want to be compared to the likes of Courtney Love and others of her ilk. Every faction of society has their colorful members that can harm the image of the overall group. But really, the OTT gays make up a very small portion of us. They're just the loudest, so to speak. It's a shame that we're all judged by the actions of so few.

gays dont have to hide there sexual orientation! this aint the 50's anymore! they just cant marry. i think they should by state but not by church. unless of course the church aproves it then the state shouldn't get a say.