Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/19/06 11:00 AM, pretentious-asshat wrote:

At 9/19/06 12:33 AM, DarkNati0nX wrote: Expanded on what exactly? Stealth bombers...?

So you ARE a selective reader.

And you ARE a retard.

But whats so wrong with a opinion as you said on PAGE 6 opinions dont matter.

That pretty much sums up your entire post.

Take your prozac, learn to be less of a retard, then try posting again.

lol, is this some kind of joke? Why don't you get out some more and communicate better with 2nd graders and THEN come back you pompous fucktard.

I'm going to leave this topic because you obviously have all the logic of a brick wall. Consider yourself the debate victor, if you want.

Have fun stewing in your ignorance.

At 9/20/06 11:23 AM, Peter-II wrote: I'm going to leave this topic because you obviously have all the logic of a brick wall.

Oh noes, the unlogical idiot calls me a unlogical idiot :'( Isnt irony sweet?

Consider yourself the debate victor, if you want.

Debate? What do you mean debate? we wasted a page or two hitting each other with your so called "meaningless rhetorics"

Have fun stewing in your ignorance.

Have fun stewing in your depression.

At 11/7/06 07:19 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 9/20/06 11:23 AM, Peter-II wrote: I'm going to leave this topic because you obviously have all the logic of a brick wall.

Oh noes, the unlogical idiot calls me a unlogical idiot :'( Isnt irony sweet?

Unlogical? What the fuck is an unlogical, you clueless retard? Do you even speak English?

Consider yourself the debate victor, if you want.

Debate? What do you mean debate? we wasted a page or two hitting each other with your so called "meaningless rhetorics"

Debate, as in discussion, as in arguing...

Seriously, do you actually speak English, or are you just typing random words into the text box and hoping it makes a valid point? Because that would explain a lot.

Have fun stewing in your ignorance.

Have fun stewing in your depression.

What's funny is you revived a two-month old topic just so you could have the last word in an internet debate. And you imply I'm depressed....

So what took you so long, arsehat? Thought I wouldn't see this?

At 11/8/06 06:43 PM, Peter-II wrote:

At 11/7/06 07:19 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 9/20/06 11:23 AM, Peter-II wrote: I'm going to leave this topic because you obviously have all the logic of a brick wall.

Oh noes, the unlogical idiot calls me a unlogical idiot :'( Isnt irony sweet?

Unlogical? What the fuck is an unlogical, you clueless retard? Do you even speak English?

Yes.

Consider yourself the debate victor, if you want.

Debate? What do you mean debate? we wasted a page or two hitting each other with your so called "meaningless rhetorics"

Debate, as in discussion, as in arguing...

Yet the arguing didnt get anywhere..

Seriously, do you actually speak English, or are you just typing random words into the text box and hoping it makes a valid point? Because that would explain a lot.

That would explain why you are doing the exact thing you just told me not to do...

Have fun stewing in your ignorance.

Have fun stewing in your depression.

What's funny is you revived a two-month old topic just so you could have the last word in an internet debate. And you imply I'm depressed....

a month actually or at least 3 weeks..

So what took you so long, arsehat? Thought I wouldn't see this?

LMAO! You were the presistent-'asshat'

I was on a plane from asia to the u.s. 2 weeks ago, and I had to get the connection to the internet with comcast :D, no actually I was expecting you since your a 'asshat'.

At 11/8/06 09:25 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 11/8/06 06:43 PM, Peter-II wrote: Unlogical? What the fuck is an unlogical, you clueless retard? Do you even speak English?

Yes.

So what's an "unlogical"?

Debate, as in discussion, as in arguing...

Yet the arguing didnt get anywhere..

Correct. What's your point?

Seriously, do you actually speak English, or are you just typing random words into the text box and hoping it makes a valid point? Because that would explain a lot.

That would explain why you are doing the exact thing you just told me not to do...

Hah, that was crap. Try harder, please. I want a mental challenge this time.

What's funny is you revived a two-month old topic just so you could have the last word in an internet debate. And you imply I'm depressed....

a month actually or at least 3 weeks..

The last post in this topic before your revival was made on 20th of September. You revived this topic on the 7th of November. That's hardly "a month actually or at least 3 weeks".

So what took you so long, arsehat? Thought I wouldn't see this?

LMAO! You were the presistent-'asshat'

I was on a plane from asia to the u.s. 2 weeks ago, and I had to get the connection to the internet with comcast :D, no actually I was expecting you since your a 'asshat'.

Even so, there's really no need to revive a topic unless you have something new to bring to the table, which you clearly don't have.

Area 51 doesn't exist! it's only a rumor!
(Noise of a gun loading)

At 11/9/06 11:03 AM, Peter-II wrote:

At 11/8/06 09:25 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 11/8/06 06:43 PM, Peter-II wrote: Unlogical? What the fuck is an unlogical, you clueless retard? Do you even speak English?

Yes.

So what's an "unlogical"?

Unlogical is when a person speaks, it means it doesnt make any sense or related to anything of reality. You do know I know the word 'unlogical' yet you ask it...which is why it goes back to the arguing...again (again)

Debate, as in discussion, as in arguing...

Yet the arguing didnt get anywhere..

Correct. What's your point?

No point, just a fact.

Seriously, do you actually speak English, or are you just typing random words into the text box and hoping it makes a valid point? Because that would explain a lot.

That would explain why you are doing the exact thing you just told me not to do...

Hah, that was crap. Try harder, please. I want a mental challenge this time.

Hmm whats this I see? "Try harder, please." Is that a statement so you can argue with me all day and night?

What's funny is you revived a two-month old topic just so you could have the last word in an internet debate. And you imply I'm depressed....

a month actually or at least 3 weeks..

The last post in this topic before your revival was made on 20th of September. You revived this topic on the 7th of November. That's hardly "a month actually or at least 3 weeks".

Pardon my mistake O' "polite" one.

So what took you so long, arsehat? Thought I wouldn't see this?

LMAO! You were the presistent-'asshat'

I was on a plane from asia to the u.s. 2 weeks ago, and I had to get the connection to the internet with comcast :D, no actually I was expecting you since your a 'asshat'.

Even so, there's really no need to revive a topic unless you have something new to bring to the table, which you clearly don't have.

Which you clearly didnt either or do you want me to create a new debatable subject concerning Area-51? Or are you just going to say Im backing out?

At 11/9/06 10:17 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 11/9/06 11:03 AM, Peter-II wrote:

At 11/8/06 09:25 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 11/8/06 06:43 PM, Peter-II wrote: Unlogical? What the fuck is an unlogical, you clueless retard? Do you even speak English?

Yes.

So what's an "unlogical"?

Unlogical is when a person speaks, it means it doesnt make any sense or related to anything of reality. You do know I know the word 'unlogical' yet you ask it...which is why it goes back to the arguing...again (again)

I think his point is that "unlogical" is not a word, the proper word you are looking to use is "illogical".

He is trying to undercut whatever your argument is by inferring that you are undereducated and therefore your point should be devalued. It is a tactic that he is using to get you off-topic and arguing about something else.

Ever Heard of The Wierdness in Russia, in the 1950's i beleive?

where this light in the sky went 50 miles east, then 50 miles west, then exploded?

At 11/9/06 10:30 PM, TheMason wrote: He is trying to undercut whatever your argument is by inferring that you are undereducated and therefore your point should be devalued. It is a tactic that he is using to get you off-topic and arguing about something else.

Hah. No. In fact, you're a complete total presumptuous moron.

I've already responded to his point that I lack logic (which is mighty ironic, considering logic also implies proper use of the English language, but whatever...). Furthermore, "a tactic he is using to get you off topic and arguing about something else"? What kind of fucking hypocrite are you, considering ad-hominem and appeal to emotion attacks such as "Oh noes, the unlogical idiot calls me a unlogical idiot :'( Isnt irony sweet?" is itself a tactic to get me off topic?

Jesus, you're an idiot. I might have tried to make a point had DarkNationX actually revived this hell-damned two month old topic for a reason rather than just for his pathetic sake of getting the last word in this now meaningless argument.

Which you clearly didnt either or do you want me to create a new debatable subject concerning Area-51? Or are you just going to say Im backing out?

I'm not going to say you're backing out because for some reason you wanted to spark the argument up again. I don't want you to create a new debateable subject concerning Area-51 either. What baffles me is why you revived a topic when you had nothing to say concerning the actual topic. You said it yourself, our debate became a meaningless argument. So why did you revive it if you're not insisting on discussing Area-51...?

HMMM area 51 eh?.... all ive heard is that its filled with new tech.

At 11/10/06 01:32 PM, Peter-II wrote:

Which you clearly didnt either or do you want me to create a new debatable subject concerning Area-51? Or are you just going to say Im backing out?

I'm not going to say you're backing out because for some reason you wanted to spark the argument up again.

What gives you that idea that I want to spark an argument that will go on forever?

I don't want you to create a new debateable subject concerning Area-51 either.

So you DO want another pointless arguement

What baffles me is why you revived a topic when you had nothing to say concerning the actual topic.

Isnt this just typical...? I explained it yet, you are still baffled.

You said it yourself, our debate became a meaningless argument. So why did you revive it if you're not insisting on discussing Area-51...?

I JUST INSISTED TO DISCUSS IT, but noo the mighty asshat (peterII) insists to bring the arguement to more level sof annoying remarks that eventually leads to another periodic time of a dead topic and gets revived.

At 11/10/06 04:24 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote: What gives you that idea that I want to spark an argument that will go on forever?

The fact that you revived a two-month-old argument which never went anywhere in the first place while willfully bringing nothing new to the table.

At 11/10/06 04:56 PM, Peter-II wrote:

At 11/10/06 04:24 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote: What gives you that idea that I want to spark an argument that will go on forever?

The fact that you revived a two-month-old argument which never went anywhere in the first place while willfully bringing nothing new to the table.

Oh? Then what have you wrought? A new post?

At 6/24/06 05:59 PM, The-Hydra-of-Spore wrote: hmm this is a first im actually being ignored... ROSWELL IS FAKE! ALIENS ARE TO SMART TO HAVE CRASHED IF THEY FOUND A WAY TO GO FASTER THAN LIGHT

Yeah, kind of like how people who are smart enough to design and build a device to launch off of the surface of their planet, travel a set path which takes into account all of the gravitational bodies and movements of those bodies in the region, there's no way they could screw up something like feet and metres.

At 11/10/06 08:16 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote:

At 11/10/06 04:56 PM, Peter-II wrote:

At 11/10/06 04:24 PM, DarkNati0nX wrote: What gives you that idea that I want to spark an argument that will go on forever?

The fact that you revived a two-month-old argument which never went anywhere in the first place while willfully bringing nothing new to the table.

Oh? Then what have you wrought? A new post?

A friend (well I say friend...) gave me the idea of taking every single one of your arguments and refuting them in layman's terms to shut you up for once and for all. I'd do it now but it's 2AM and I'm too tired. I might do it do tomorrow, if I get the time.

At 11/10/06 09:00 PM, Peter-II wrote

gave me the idea of taking every single one of your arguments and refuting them in layman's terms to shut you up for once and for all. I'd do it now but it's 2AM and I'm too tired. I might do it do tomorrow, if I get the time.

You really are a protectorate arent you....

It was not aliens. There is no way a spaceship that could travel such a distance would be some tiny piece of crap saucer thing.

I've only read the first page of this thread so far, but I'd like to respond to JMHX.

At 6/24/06 07:26 PM, JMHX wrote: Wikipedia is by no means a valid source.

Thank you. You are entirely correct.

At 11/12/06 11:21 PM, fasdit wrote: It was not aliens. There is no way a spaceship that could travel such a distance would be some tiny piece of crap saucer thing.

Not for us humans maybe. But as long as it doesnt affect the way we breathe the air, i will be content with no aliens or aliens.