Be a Supporter!

Batting Average

  • 13,534 Views
  • 257 Replies
Respond to this Topic
Rustygames
Rustygames
  • Member since: May. 7, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 19
Programmer
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:40:00 Reply

I think now you should make it so you must have a higher BA to get A+. Like 4.0+ is an A+


- Matt, Rustyarcade.com

Xurch
Xurch
  • Member since: Mar. 26, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 25
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:40:46 Reply

At 6/23/06 01:39 PM, harryjarry wrote:
At 6/23/06 01:31 PM, Dark_Spark wrote: tom you're just asking for people to spam up the portal now
Why? People don't decide not to submit a bad movie because it will affect their batting average.

Id sometimes rather submit something I know will get a low score but still just see what people think, I never have though because of the batting average thing.


BBS Signature
Kirk-Cocaine
Kirk-Cocaine
  • Member since: Aug. 17, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Moderator
Level 38
Programmer
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:41:18 Reply

At 6/23/06 01:40 PM, Ninja-chicken wrote: I think now you should make it so you must have a higher BA to get A+. Like 4.0+ is an A+

Aren't the BA ranks dynamic?


The water in Majorca don't taste like what it oughta.

| AS3: Main | AS2: Main | Flash Tutorials |

BBS Signature
Daedalus
Daedalus
  • Member since: Nov. 16, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:45:39 Reply

Batting average: 3.48 / 5.00 (A+)

<deleted>
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:47:14 Reply

At 6/23/06 12:23 PM, TomFulp wrote: Per some recent discussion, artist batting averages are now based on their TOP THREE submissions. This means your bad submissions won't hurt you, as long as you have submitted good ones!

Artists no longer have to remove old submissions to improve their average, they simply have to submit new, better games and movies! Artists are also now free to submit goofy stuff that may have previously hurt their average.

Everyone should take a moment and thank Liljim for implementing all these great changes! James does all the PHP / database programming, so without him, these features wouldn't happen.

Outstanding news!!! This is really great!!!

I was thinking about removing some of my entries in my main because of this , now I don't have to anymore!!!

This is really fucking great , Tom!!!

Now I can send stupid shit and not worry about having a shitty Batting Average! This will definitely bring the portal back to the old times when people didn't care much about their batting averages and all sent all kinds of funny things to the portal!!

Yes!

yam
yam
  • Member since: Mar. 12, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:48:41 Reply

The upadates, SO MANY!

Bigfoot3290
Bigfoot3290
  • Member since: Aug. 18, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 45
Animator
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:52:32 Reply

Yes, these changes are for the better. Awesome work Liljim and anyone else who helped in the process :D

Chris
Chris
  • Member since: Sep. 17, 2004
  • Online!
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:55:30 Reply

:D

i'm going to submit my "Crazy animal lunch time laugh" movie without fear of my battling average dropping

SmackBang
SmackBang
  • Member since: Jun. 4, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:56:45 Reply

Cheers thats great news. Now my batting average is not bad.


But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

<deleted>
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:56:52 Reply

Yesss !!!!

Piconjo's Batting Average went from a 2.10 to a whupping 4.13 !!! He finally got a deserving batting average to his talent!!!

Piclownjews
Piclownjews
  • Member since: Jan. 28, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 05
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:57:45 Reply

At 6/23/06 12:23 PM, TomFulp wrote: Per some recent discussion, artist batting averages are now based on their TOP THREE submissions. This means your bad submissions won't hurt you, as long as you have submitted good ones!

Wow Tom!
Wow.

You have just obliterated one of the sharpest leashes on artistic creativity on this website!

Let the craziness flow!!!!1


Neil Armstrong was a gay buttfucking crocodile.

BBS Signature
Back-Door-Baron
Back-Door-Baron
  • Member since: Feb. 9, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 36
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 13:58:04 Reply

This goes along well with the last bit of news... people don't have to worry about their old, crappy work since it won't affect them now. So now we can really see the evolution of an artist since their old work won't negatively affect their stats.

I do agree, though, that 3 submissions is a bit low. Maybe something a bit more inclusive would be nice, giving the artist more incentive to submit more and more good work? I was thinking 5 or 10 would be good numbers to ensure that there might still be one or two works of flash sticking around that the artist would want out of their pool.


Count the bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drum...

<deleted>
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:18:35 Reply

At 6/23/06 01:57 PM, -Piclownjew- wrote:
At 6/23/06 12:23 PM, TomFulp wrote: Per some recent discussion, artist batting averages are now based on their TOP THREE submissions. This means your bad submissions won't hurt you, as long as you have submitted good ones!

Wow Tom!
Wow.

You have just obliterated one of the sharpest leashes on artistic creativity on this website!

Let the craziness flow!!!!1

Agreed! This is definitely one of the greatest updates ever!!!
Now the portal is gonna rock ass like it was before!

seanjames
seanjames
  • Member since: Apr. 1, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 37
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:20:14 Reply

Excellent idea. I had deleted a submission, to see if the batting average would change. When it was higher than I had calculated I was confused. Now I get it. That's a fair rule, though it might not be a bad idea to use like the top 1/3 of a user's submissions, to properly weight it. Just a thought.


BBS Signature
<deleted>
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:21:23 Reply

lol this update is so great ...! Even Fat Badger ( the King of the TOTW ) Batting Average went from a 2.92 to a 4.12 !!! Hahhaa!!!! This will definitely shut the mouthes of those who diss him because of his turds!

RupeeClock
RupeeClock
  • Member since: Aug. 31, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 57
Animator
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:22:26 Reply

I would like to thank james for kicking my batting average up about 0.20 and putting me at 4.12. :D

Hahaha, if it weren't for all the other authors that I'm sure that are in the same situation as me, that I'd be on the top 50 rated artists tomorrow!

ViceFullbuster
ViceFullbuster
  • Member since: Sep. 16, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 60
Melancholy
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:26:10 Reply

No more F+ for X-Naut,now it's a D+. ^_^

still haven't broken 1.00

NOW IS WHEN YOU RAM HAPPY WITH LIFE SAUCE. PSN Screenname - Mooglejoke Wii U Network ID - Mooglejoke - Nintendo 3DS Friend Code 4768-8871-1657

BBS Signature
RupeeClock
RupeeClock
  • Member since: Aug. 31, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 57
Animator
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:31:52 Reply

At 6/23/06 02:26 PM, X-Naut wrote: No more F+ for X-Naut,now it's a D+. ^_^

still haven't broken 1.00

Uh oh! I'd better get to work on zeroing those!

You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.6698 to 0.6697!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.7054 to 0.7052!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.5626 to 0.5626!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.7264 to 0.7262!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.7852 to 0.7850!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.6403 to 0.6402!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.6765 to 0.6764!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.9047 to 0.9043!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.9151 to 0.9146!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 0.7583 to 0.7579!
You gave this entry a 0, lowering its score from 1.1265 to 1.1249!

We can't have X-naut without his F+ now, can we??

<deleted>
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:37:44 Reply

that's one of the few drawbacks of this system ... now X-Naut no longer has his perfect F+ Average... but not to worry.... I will help you out X-Naut ... I will vote 0 on your entries every day so you can earn your F+ again!

wesdood
wesdood
  • Member since: Apr. 6, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 28
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:38:04 Reply

oh swell sir.

23450
23450
  • Member since: May. 28, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 27
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:38:12 Reply

Will we have to change the minimum batting average for a ballob because of this, due to everyones B/A going up a good amount. (mine when up .88)


BBS Signature
RiftMaster
RiftMaster
  • Member since: Mar. 17, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:40:18 Reply

Thats awesome. For the longest time my batting average was like B+ or something gay because of my old little shitty submissions I made in 2 minutes.


I put the "funk" in function()

RemRulzz
RemRulzz
  • Member since: Apr. 9, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 41
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:41:06 Reply

this change should make alot of user happy,a nice update for all flash makers...


BBS Signature
TremcladClock
TremcladClock
  • Member since: Aug. 11, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 29
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:43:08 Reply

The old system was better, now it's not really an average , is it now?


Non-dairy produkt

BBS Signature
Glaiel-Gamer
Glaiel-Gamer
  • Member since: Dec. 28, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 28
Game Developer
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:45:48 Reply

At 6/23/06 12:27 PM, _Nick_ wrote: Lol, Glaiel's BA has gone from about 3.4 something to 4.07 =D

OMG STALKER

well it was 3.70. I thought it was pretty good actually, considering the amount of submissions i had.

But 4.07 looks sweet too.

KupaMan
KupaMan
  • Member since: Oct. 20, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 43
Artist
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:48:29 Reply

Yay! I'm now at a 4.18! Pretty cool. I kind of liked the average of all, rather than of the user's top three, but I have no problem with it I guess.


I suck.

Inglor
Inglor
  • Member since: Jan. 26, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:49:01 Reply

another positive change,

oh, and give james a break, NG is a lot to handle on his own, what about hiring another guy to help him with his work? so many changes :)

Wonchop
Wonchop
  • Member since: Jan. 13, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 36
Animator
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:49:54 Reply

Batting average: 4.01 / 5.00 (A+)
Swell =D Great idea, Tom/Liljim. Kinda like how THPS3 skate competitions go about. I like.

W-A-C
W-A-C
  • Member since: Mar. 26, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 31
Gamer
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:52:24 Reply

I actually really dislike that new change. Now flash artists can sbmit a horrible flash and it doesn't affect their battling average unless of course they're top flashes aren't necessarily that high scored. I like to know their overall average not just their best work's average.


I added the "2008 Kucinich" thing to my sig less than 24 hours before he dropped out of the race and has been too lazy to change it. <_<

BBS Signature
API
API
  • Member since: Oct. 13, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 22
Blank Slate
Response to Batting Average 2006-06-23 14:56:05 Reply

Sick. I now have a 4.12 batting average :D