Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/9/06 05:24 PM, AccessCode wrote: I like technicalities. Don't you?

"There are absolutely NO WMDs in Iraq"

*Old WMDs found that could be "destructive"*

"Well, uh, these aren't the same"

It goes a little differently, I believe, for the originator of this very old thread and people like you, Access.

"There were WMD's in Iraq!"

"Old WMD's found that can't be used in any fashion other than creating a big bump on someone's head."

"Well, uh, these are the same!"

At 7/9/06 05:33 PM, Thespus wrote:

It goes a little differently, I believe, for the originator of this very old thread and people like you, Access.

I feel loved.

"There were WMD's in Iraq!"

"Old WMD's found that can't be used in any fashion other than creating a big bump on someone's head."

"Well, uh, these are the same!"

Interesting...as the fact is that there were and still are WMDs there.

At 7/9/06 05:47 PM, AccessCode wrote: Interesting...as the fact is that there were and still are WMDs there.

once again i ask the question; are WMDs that cannot cause any destruction still WMDs?

At 6/21/06 09:36 PM, punisher19848 wrote: To all the doubters out there, to those who chanted the slogans of "Bush lied, people died" and "No blood for oil" I present you with vindication for the war in Iraq. The WMDs are real and they have been found! Don't believe me? Take a look for yourselves...

http://www.foxnews.c..,2933,200499,00.html


For a copy of the actual document, read:

http://www.foxnews.c..WMD_Declassified.pdf


Now that 500 mustard gas and serin shells predating the Gulf War have been recovered, you have no basis for your ridiculous George Bush conspiricy theories and stupid chants any more. Reality is calling to you, I suggest you answer...

Gas Weapons have been around since WW1 and are barely WMDs. GWB himself admits there are no real WMDs in Iraq.Bush is a horrible president, Our debt is near to an all time high.

At 7/9/06 05:47 PM, AccessCode wrote: Interesting...as the fact is that there were and still are WMDs there.

Delusional much?

Anyone with an ounce of common sense and an education level above High School sophomore would know that decade-old mustard gas isn't usable as a weapon. They found shell casings, not bombs. I don't know why you still believe that there are WMD's in Iraq. It's disturbing.

At 7/9/06 06:45 PM, Thespus wrote:

Anyone with an ounce of common sense and an education level above High School sophomore would know that decade-old mustard gas isn't usable as a weapon. They found shell casings, not bombs. I don't know why you still believe that there are WMD's in Iraq. It's disturbing.

It's disturbing how damn retarded you are.

Let me put this in a way you can understand. Mustard gas (decades old) does not have the destructive potential as it did (i've already admitted to this in this thread). However, it can still do small, but severe damage.

Way to NOT read!

At 7/9/06 05:24 PM, AccessCode wrote: I like technicalities. Don't you?

You're baseing your arguement on a "well-they-technically-had-WMDs" argument?

I think people were thinking WMDs were more on the lines of North Korea's very real missle deployment... and stuff.