At 6/17/06 08:11 AM, McPaper wrote:
I would have only given him 5 months
how the nfuck can you let him of with 5 motnhs!
the world is fucked up the harder the crime the lesser the punishment. theyre evne trying to abolish the death penalty. heres my opninon
if you killed someone, you should die. ened of story, if you are tried, and found guilty of murder, you shold be killed on the spot. no daeth row for 9 months, no last meal, no rights. you lost your rights when you decided to murder someone.
and we've got guys that we KNOW did the crime getting off. nto to long ago that Texan woman who drowned her three kids in the bathtub got off for "insanity".
NO SHIT SHE'S INSANE SHE KILLED HER THREE SONS!
insanity is no excuse for what you do. if you are clinically insane and that is why you committed the crime, than why didn't you have someone to watch oevr yuo. its law, i think, that if you are clinically insane, you cannot live alone, you need a supervisor. well where was he? if you were smart enough to wait until the guy left, then your not insane are you?
rape is also mno laughing matter. i say may be... 20 years for this particular rape. IT WAS A FUCKING THREE-YEAR-OLD! not only is that messed up, but you may have caused something to go wrong with this kid who has no ocncept of what you did, and you took advantage of that.
and yet, these kinds of crimes give you so much to go by before you become the one to die. so many murderes appeal there case before they die, and get off after they've been waiting.
makes me sick, both for the criminals, and the dumbass who decides the sentence.