At 6/13/06 01:27 PM, Samuraikyo wrote:
Not protecting anyone here but i dont see why people say all his stuff is stolen because half the animations there were in fact submitted by the original author, because i would submit my work there because he gets millions of hits a day regardless if newgrounds hates him. So the author would sue because Eric made his movie more noticeable and more popular? Also wouldnt the copyright only work if someone had taken it and claimed it as there own? This is the internet, his codes means nothing because everything is stolen on the internet. Every time we type a letter someone else had that on there site before so does that mean typing is stolen.
I will be sure to keep an eye out for anything that you make that's quality and rebrand it and steal it. I will open it and tweak it as needed and then give you a tiny text link somewhere on the page.
The big point about this is it is about theft. It would be the same thing if I harvested articles from other magazines, put all the good ones into my own magazine, and gave it away and then said all my money was coming from advertisers and not from the articles.
So, this case can bring us to a cross roads, which is very important. It will either lay down rules for the rights of small copyright holders from assholes.
OR
It will say that theft is okay, and the internet will legally become a free for all as we now have a US court saying we can steal other people's shit and just play dumb about it.
Win win situation, Either eBaum's gets shut down, or we can go back to having massive mp3 and media servers operating in the US again without fear of legal ramifications as long as they say "Oh, we thought Britney Spears submitted that crap to us herself" every week, and we don't make money off of the songs, we make it off of advertising, which is okay (see case Alan v eBaum).
Hmmmm...... That would be hilarious.