Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/22/07 07:46 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: Oh, and I quote; "A run-on sentence is a sentence in which two or more independent clauses are joined without punctuation or conjunctions."

Even with commas, there are many places where periods should have been. And also, your clause was "how dare...", so it should've ended with a question mark.

Bah-zing.

At 5/22/07 07:48 PM, Dr-Worm wrote:

Even with commas, there are many places where periods should have been.

No, there was one independent idea expressed. Once again; run on = multiple clause, no punctuation to merge them.

And also, your clause was "how dare...", so it should've ended with a question mark.

Bah-zing.

Actually, as this was clearly a rhetorical question that I had no intention of wanting answered, no need for a question mark. For example, "WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH YOU!" Is acceptable, since it is the same as saying "SOMETHING IS THE MATTER WITH YOU!". I was not actually asking him how he dares to call them villains. I was telling him not to dare calling them villains. And if it's good enough for my English teachers, it's good enough for the BBS.

At 5/22/06 01:35 PM, SEXY-FETUS wrote: It's true and our soldiers are getting killed because god hates us for not killin off the queers.

I hope for your sake that you were kidding.

At 5/22/07 07:58 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote:

Okay, you are seriously missing the point here. The issue is not whether or not your paragraph was grammatically correct, the issue is nobody wants to read paragraphs that long.

So, in other words, you can write huge paragraphs if you want to, but no-one will read them.

At 5/16/07 08:04 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote:

Yes. You are completely right. American Soldiers are murderers. Every single one of them. This point cannot truthfully be contested. Shall we examine? While murder has many definitions, and many different uses, the way I learned it was that murder was to kill someone on purpose, with malice. This is the definition I shall use in this post, and it is to that I am reffering to whenever I use the word 'murder'. And you see, whenever a brave patriot signs up to wear our nations uniform, he agree's to become a murderer. He agrees to give up his nice, suburban, care-free life, to accept the burden of having to go to a foreign country, hate, and kill. He agree's to willfully give up his carefree world to carry the horrendous task of having to be constantly in a state of hatred and contempt. He must sacrifice a life of easy-going for a life of misery and strife, sacrifice happiness for despair. And finally, he must take those people he hates, and he must kill them. He must love his nation enough to commit the one act no person should ever have to, to tear his soul apart and ruin any chance of returning to that carefree life, by commiting the one act no good human wants to do; he must take a life. He must shelve the burden his entire for the rest of his days that he took another persons life, and he must be tormented by this fact every single day of his existence. He must spend all his life always doubting, always questioning, and always remembering the actions he was forced to commit. So whether he be Hugh Thompson, the hero forced to be willing to take the life of his own military commander to save the lives of countless civillians, the hero Marine who is forced to murder an innocent iraqi because he believed the lives off his comrades was in danger, or the hero Air Force pilot who drops a bomb ona key terrorist hideout, disabling their weapons productions, they are all murderers. And they are all the greatest men ever to walk this earth. Most could die for their country. But only a hero, a patriot, and a true human being could commit the greatest sin known to man for his country. And don't you dare EVER try and make the argument that it is easy for them, that by sacrificing so much they are made bad people. Until you shoot someone, until you see that by your choices a man no longer lives, and until you realise that he could have been just like you, could have had a family, could have been your best friend if you had known him, until you know what all that feels like, and once you realise that all that could have been avoided if you had not enlisted, had you not chose to go through all that for the good of the people, then how dare call those brave souls villains. And you know what? Maybe their sacrifices did cement them a spot in hell. Just maybe. But I can promise you that when you die, they will be there waiting for you.

. WHO WANTS TO READ THAT ??? It does not matter what your teacher says, the point is it is hard to read , .GOD YOU ARE DENSE..

I had to post the entire thing because it was so long the BBS itself would not let me.
;
in case anyone reads the above post and I am pretty sure you wont because it is TO HARD TO READ. it is not my views actually I am not sure if it is since I did not bother reading the Damn thing.

Wow, we're arguing about run-on sentences.

If anyone thinks American soldiers are murderers then I advise you schedule yourself for a leukotomy.

At 5/21/07 08:46 AM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: there not murderers if there doing it for there country and they feel there life is threatened

It doesn't matter if your fighting for your country. It is still murder, you are still intentionally taking someones life.

And I guess that Iraqi's have as much right to murder as Americans do, because they are the people who ultimately feel there life is the most threatened, compared with the Americans.

At 5/24/07 01:58 PM, Hashshashin wrote:

At 5/21/07 08:46 AM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: there not murderers if there doing it for there country and they feel there life is threatened

It doesn't matter if your fighting for your country. It is still murder, you are still intentionally taking someones life.

And I guess that Iraqi's have as much right to murder as Americans do, because they are the people who ultimately feel there life is the most threatened, compared with the Americans.

LOOK DIPSHIT It is not murder, MURDER is taking THE LIFE OF A a innocent, unarmed, person, And you must have the forethought to kill that person. even in our court system it is in different levels, like Manslaughter, MURDER 1,AND 2.
;
I will say this to you once since you seem to be lacking something important in the thing we call a head. as a Soldier I am NOT going to kill someone intentionally unless they bring it upon themselves. so in case you still do not understand Don't point a gun at me and do what I ask And I wont put a Metal Jacket in your Head.

At 5/24/07 10:31 PM, troubles1 wrote:

LOOK DIPSHIT It is not murder, MURDER is taking THE LIFE OF A a innocent, unarmed, person, And you must have the forethought to kill that person. even in our court system it is in different levels, like Manslaughter, MURDER 1,AND 2.
;
I will say this to you once since you seem to be lacking something important in the thing we call a head. as a Soldier I am NOT going to kill someone intentionally unless they bring it upon themselves. so in case you still do not understand Don't point a gun at me and do what I ask And I wont put a Metal Jacket in your Head.

Right, you dyslexic cunt, all i'm saying is that murder is killing someone, and if you remove all the issues about them being armed, dangerous or not innocent, it is still murder at the end of the day. Also, i'm probably going to be wrong here but murder is also the act of killing some unlawfully, and if i'm correct, the Iraq War is, as I still remember it, illegal. So basically, you are killing Iraqis illegally, which is murder.

If soldiers didnt kill wed all be speaking german under the nazis

At 5/22/06 12:53 PM, HogWashSoup wrote: unless it is for self defence, it is murder if you kill someone, even in war.

all these soldiers who kill in iraq come home as murderers, not heros.

"hey i killed about 20 iraqie soldiers" < murderer

go pee!

but war in general is just another form of butchery...

At 5/26/07 01:07 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

At 5/26/07 11:11 AM, Hashshashin wrote:

At 5/24/07 10:31 PM, troubles1 wrote:

Right, you dyslexic cunt

stfu noob you have no place on the bbs to say that to a other user

Haha, funny. I'm sure you were a 'noob' at one point.

At 5/22/06 12:53 PM, HogWashSoup wrote: unless it is for self defence, it is murder if you kill someone, even in war.

all these soldiers who kill in iraq come home as murderers, not heros.

"hey i killed about 20 iraqie soldiers" < murderer

go pee!

If it wasn't for soldiers you wouldn't be here you whinny bitch. Any soldier that comes home from Iraq is most definitely a hero. Do they take lives? Yes, but it's necessary. I know you would like it if war was a big Laser Tag Tournament but it's not. Get used to the real world.

At 5/26/07 12:31 PM, J1993 wrote: If soldiers didnt kill wed all be speaking german under the nazis

but how would the Nazis have won if soldiers didn't kill?

i don't want to get into this argument, i just couldn't let this one by.

At 5/27/07 12:15 AM, SolInvictus wrote: but how would the Nazis have won if soldiers didn't kill?

Well, German is a much more forceful language than English :P And definitely more forceful than French...

At 5/22/06 01:31 PM, HogWashSoup wrote:

At 5/22/06 01:27 PM, Cajunspirit wrote: " All is fair in love and war "

that was coined by a moron.

you kill someone for love....you go to jail then hell.
you kill someone in war...you become a hero....then go to hell

Didn't God lead his troops to victory in battle in ancient times? You claim that soldiers go to hell, yet apparently war is a tool that even God himself must sometimes use. You may want to do some research next time, it's called "The Bible".

At 5/27/07 01:11 AM, Dr-Worm wrote: Well, German is a much more forceful language than English :P And definitely more forceful than French...

damnit, it seesm i've been beat.

on a more serious note; hasn't this thread gone on long enough (longer than enough)?

At 5/26/07 09:16 PM, Hashshashin wrote:

At 5/26/07 01:07 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

At 5/26/07 11:11 AM, Hashshashin wrote:

At 5/24/07 10:31 PM, troubles1 wrote:

Right, you dyslexic cunt

stfu noob you have no place on the bbs to say that to a other user

Haha, funny. I'm sure you were a 'noob' at one point.

I am sure of it but unlike you he was a intelligent Noob, you have no respect for the people doing there jobs ALL OVER THE WORLD. , THIS IS NOT EVEN A DEBAIT WITH YOU. you lack the intelligence to even understand the meaning of the word murder. you do not belong on this forum , do everyone a favor, and find some little kid forum you can troll on..

At 5/22/06 12:53 PM, HogWashSoup wrote: unless it is for self defence, it is murder if you kill someone, even in war.

all these soldiers who kill in iraq come home as murderers, not heros.

"hey i killed about 20 iraqie soldiers" < murderer

go pee!

You're a douchebag. They are not murderers, nor they are heroes. They are REAL MEN. They have fought for their country. If you don't respect those people, you need to get shot.

Thats not true. Soldires are not murders. That is a terrorist.

At 5/28/07 05:14 PM, zachass5 wrote: Thats not true. Soldires are not murders. That is a terrorist.

Technically, they are murderers. Murder, by definition, is intentional killing.

Whether the connotation commonly designated to the term "murder" is justified to give to soldiers is open to debate. I'd say that they don't deserve ridicule, as war is really quite natural to us as a species. If they fuck up, sure, individuals can fuck up. But soldiers in general do not deserve derision.

Not that I'm for war, as I'm truly quite against it. It unfortunately has purpose though; no matter your standings you must realize the logic in this. It's as natural to mankind as building shelter.

Murderers are people who kill others for many reasons.
Soldiers are people who fight and kill people for their country.

Well, in war is either kill or be killed, what would you if you are under fire and have nothing else to do then die or shoot back?

Yeah its murder. Do you have a problem with it? Because I don't.

and so are politicians