The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.34 / 5.00 31,296 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.07 / 5.00 10,082 ViewsNo one ever answered my question: Can we vote 0 on movies which have already been protected, such as top 50 movies? And if not, why?
Have a lot of time on your hands? Want to help some starving children eat for free? Visit Free Rice and start playing today. Each correct answer donates 20 grains of rice!
I say yes, the person is a dumbass. Blamming everything is even counter-productive. If it doesn't get blammed then you don't get a blam point. Vote responsibly.
At 2/5/03 08:39 AM, SoulRifter wrote: No one ever answered my question: Can we vote 0 on movies which have already been protected, such as top 50 movies? And if not, why?
I mostly agree with your replies when you write about Wades way of controlling our votes.
At 2/5/03 10:00 AM, Sybarite wrote:At 2/5/03 08:39 AM, SoulRifter wrote: No one ever answered my question: Can we vote 0 on movies which have already been protected, such as top 50 movies? And if not, why?I mostly agree with your replies when you write about Wades way of controlling our votes.
Hey, thanks :)
Have a lot of time on your hands? Want to help some starving children eat for free? Visit Free Rice and start playing today. Each correct answer donates 20 grains of rice!
At 2/5/03 02:05 PM, SoulRifter wrote:At 2/5/03 10:00 AM, Sybarite wrote:I mostly agree with your replies when you write about Wades way of controlling our votes.
Hey, thanks :)
Yea ,psshhh, Fight The Power... MAAAAAN
*the robot*
At 2/4/03 06:16 PM, ButtBoy wrote: I think the whole voting low to contribute to blams was a bad idea. If someone hit X it didn't change the score and only required many users hitting X to blam. Now that a 0 or 1 means that a movie could get blammed the crowd seems divided between lynch mob, voter's rights, and moderates. If anyone else is upset for lowered scores, get over it. Just because some noob votes 0 and changes your score by .01 doesn't mean you should get all bent out of shape.
Actually Buttboy (hehe), when we had the X button and it was clicked it was the same as clicking 0. However it was supposed to also flag the movie for our review, but that never happened. We now have the whistle system.
Hey Wade, what about people who vote 5 on everything? People do that too. Would that be punished?
At 2/5/03 08:39 AM, SoulRifter wrote: No one ever answered my question: Can we vote 0 on movies which have already been protected, such as top 50 movies? And if not, why?
You can, but we'll know. However, we feel our users should have the right to shape the TOP 50 as they see fit. However, voting 0 on good movies just to get something they like better higher in the TOP 50 list results in all the TOP 50 movies getting lower and lower scores. That is why no movie holds over a 4.00 for long and eventually averages out around a 3.77.
At 2/4/03 12:02 AM, Bradondo wrote: I think a warning first then a deletion. I see no free-speech or free-opinion issue here. Anyone who votes zero on everything is just being a punk and has crossed a line which should result in the loss of their voting priveleges.
I agree with you. That's all I have to say.
The Newgrounds forums are not for serious debate, but humorous entertainment only.
I'm guessing all those movies you just listed were under judgement at the time? If so then Id definetely say you should delete the account.
At 2/5/03 02:24 PM, WadeFulp wrote: Actually Buttboy (hehe), when we had the X button and it was clicked it was the same as clicking 0. However it was supposed to also flag the movie for our review, but that never happened. We now have the whistle system.
My girlfriend calls me that because I like da booty.
I forgot about X doing the score thing also. The whole scoring thing is a hard thing to plan perfectly. Blams have to be done by the user or it's too much for the admins or mods to blam every movie. Even if that is figured out, user will still have a problem with people lowering their score.
Speaking of 0 voters, anyone remember that k1lo guy? He would hit the X on all clock movies and copy and past the voting results in his reviews. Is that guy still around?
At 2/5/03 03:38 PM, ButtBoy wrote:
Speaking of 0 voters, anyone remember that k1lo guy? He would hit the X on all clock movies and copy and past the voting results in his reviews. Is that guy still around?
All his reviews were deleted, he left or something.
At 2/5/03 03:51 PM, Wadezilla wrote:At 2/5/03 03:38 PM, ButtBoy wrote:Speaking of 0 voters, anyone remember that k1lo guy? He would hit the X on all clock movies and copy and past the voting results in his reviews. Is that guy still around?All his reviews were deleted, he left or something.
I remember him....I hated that guy.
i think people should get a warning first, i think its gr8 that you have to watch movies before voting, but wot if a good movie, graphics wise, offends some1.
At 2/5/03 02:28 PM, WadeFulp wrote:
You can, but we'll know.
Hmm, so it is not wrong to do this then? Thanks for the input though, I appreciate it.
Have a lot of time on your hands? Want to help some starving children eat for free? Visit Free Rice and start playing today. Each correct answer donates 20 grains of rice!
Give them a warning first Wade; if they don't stop or do and start up again when they think you guys are "looking" delete their accounts.
At 2/3/03 11:32 PM, WadeFulp wrote: Should we terminate people's user accounts who have voting habits like this:
MOVIE TITLE | SCORE AT TIME OF PROTECTION | VOTE GIVEN
Absolutely. A warning or perhaps two would go down well first,of course, but just voting '0' regardless of the quality just isn't right.
How about old user accounts,too? Say over 18 months/2 years without being used... that may clear space for new ones :)
At 2/5/03 03:53 PM, mr_chuckles66 wrote:At 2/5/03 03:51 PM, Wadezilla wrote:I remember him....I hated that guy.At 2/5/03 03:38 PM, ButtBoy wrote:Speaking of 0 voters, anyone remember that k1lo guy? He would hit the X on all clock movies and copy and past the voting results in his reviews. Is that guy still around?All his reviews were deleted, he left or something.
I didn't care for him either. I always wished that he would post on the bbs and explain his hatred of the clocks. Now that he is gone, I guess most people don't who he is.