Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Lol the spotlight submission is funny, took me 59 seconds, initially i was clickin the balloons for about 15 seconds and wondering why nothing was happening :P

Hey guys, I'd love it if you could review my movie.
I released it at the beginning of the year some time, but I still love watching it.
Chalk Adventure

And if you could please, a recommendation to the Experimental collection? Don't have to though, since it's what the club is about.

Is the update for this going to be on Monday again? I could do with a little extra time to get some of the requests done, so doing the list on Monday would be enough for me to get them done. Had quite a busy week last week :x

I would like to get this song reviewed.
AND i requested some songs 2 weekd ago i wasn't on the list so...
Prelude pour la Gaietéby Jurian
Swimming by Jurian

I was gone for a long time..
lets call it a NG vacation

At 4/11/08 10:19 AM, Kacper2468 wrote: i dont get this

What's confusing you?

At 4/10/08 03:43 PM, Haggard wrote:

On a related note, what are everyone's thoughts on splitting the update of requests and the update of the reviewers? As I previously noted, it's nice to have an assembled list and would sometimes help to have over a week for doing reviews. It'd certainly help a little if there's more hiccups.

I think it's worth a shot. If it doesn't work out as hoped we can always go back to the old system. The major advantage is that reviewers will have at least one whole week for their reviews. So I'd say we update the stat list on Sundays as milinko did. The requests list could be updated on Saturday or even on Friday.

OK. I'm gonna start doing a list of requests. That's kinda quicker to do and I like to have a list of songs to DL myself, so don't mind doing it for a month or so. Though it's already Sunday this week, I'll start doing it on Thursday-Friday as of next week. I'll probably repost the previous list each time too, to avoid confusion.

One other merit of doing it a couple of days before - if the list maintainer goes awol, there's a couple of days for folk to notice and someone else to pick up the slack. Of course, if I know I can't do it one week, I'll try to let you know and any maintainer should do the same. But it might not always be possible.

I also like to pick up a suggestion you made some days (weeks?) ago: We should have one (or more) 'vice list-maintainers'. Maybe those persons can do updates for about a month and then the next person takes over, etc. Seems like a good idea to me.

Essentially, we need someone to volunteer time to maintain these lists. It would be good to have some sort of plan for the next month at least. It's all a question of who will give a bit of time.

I was thinking it may be an idea to give points or something to whomever updates the list of reviewers. Pros - may encourage people to do it. Cons - giving points for it might actually 'cheapen' the effort folk go to to update that list?

Sorry for double posting

At 4/7/08 06:25 PM, Mad-Muppet wrote: Hey peeps :P

I just gotta come and apologize a little, cause i just joined the club i haven't review much. I was away the whole last week and stuff came in the way. But hopefully i'll get more done now that i'm back home ^^

No probs. Just do whatever you can - we're not here to make you feel bad if your % is under 100. ;-)

Also, wanna review my remix of Pulp Fiction Theme?

Awesome track. 7+

At 4/11/08 07:31 PM, Shanus wrote: I've beengoing through the submissions for this week and it seems that GlowingMonkey's Snakes on Fire doesn't want to fully load for me or Shadow-1409. So he kindly gave Shadow his myspace account address with the track on it. http://www.myspace.com/glowingm

You need to be logged onto myspace to download the track but you can stream it easily there.

Don't know if anyone is having trouble with it but I'd like to know??

Loaded fine for me. I normally dl stuff before listening before reviewing, but this worked fine for me just now.

At 4/13/08 11:02 AM, Bezman wrote: OK. I'm gonna start doing a list of requests. That's kinda quicker to do and I like to have a list of songs to DL myself, so don't mind doing it for a month or so.

Great, thanks!

I also like to pick up a suggestion you made some days (weeks?) ago: We should have one (or more) 'vice list-maintainers'. Maybe those persons can do updates for about a month and then the next person takes over, etc. Seems like a good idea to me.

Essentially, we need someone to volunteer time to maintain these lists. It would be good to have some sort of plan for the next month at least. It's all a question of who will give a bit of time.

I think I can do it for the next month or so. I then would like to update the list on Mondays, around 3pm GMT+1.
Let's see what Shanus has to say about that, as he once mentioned he planned to take over the list. ;)

I was thinking it may be an idea to give points or something to whomever updates the list of reviewers. Pros - may encourage people to do it. Cons - giving points for it might actually 'cheapen' the effort folk go to to update that list?

Hm, I don't like this idea. Might cause to much confusion for newbies, and after all this is a Club based on reviews. So I think the points should be awarded only for reviews (well, and for posting here of course, so that the club stays alive ;) ).

To requestors - if you made a request within the past week and it is not listed below, I have made a mistake. I am, after all, only human. Let me know if the unthinkable has happened and I missed your request or got the link wrong.

To reviewers - this is the list of requests made between the last update and now. Hopefully someone else will tally the points for your writing these reviews sometime in around 7-8 days.

To the 2 new members - Welcome! I suggest you start by reviewing the flash submissions, loop and music listed below. Then, sometime later in the week, mention how many requests you've reviewed and how many points you should have. You'll then be added to the list next week. Haggard's post on p183 and Shanus's update later tonight will explain the points.

General Rules for Requesters:

If you are planning on requesting review, please do the following:
-I will post no more than 3 requests from a single user in one week.
-Please do us a favor and respond to reviews if you request them.
-Due to the points system, you may not see reviews until up to two weeks after you request.
-Post a direct link to the submission(s) you want reviewed.
-DO NOT request without putting a link, I don't have the time or patience to get the links myself.
-DO NOT say "Review everything" for the same reason above.
-DO NOT request the same submission more than once.

Flash Requests:
9/11: The Tragedy by Zacied
BlueHippo's Birthday :0 by Bahamut
Street Fighter Series pt2 by mortis5000
Evasion - Tequila by Nick Lavrov (MinusNick)
Tutorial: Deity Whistle by sickstick
Tutorial: Overhead RPG 2 by sickstick
Jammin' for Jam by sickstick
Chalk Adventure by Goat-Man

Audio Requests:
Rock Inferno Minute One by Xmanne
Beaten into a Pulp (DjD) by Jakob Svensson (Mad-Muppet)
Untitled Orchestral Piece (SC) by Sam C (BreakingFaces)
Thoughts* by Jurian
Prelude pour la Gaieté by Jurian
Swimming by Jurian

Coop83's spotlight submission:
Stabika: 99 Red Balloons by Porter (Matt-Porter)

This isn't meant to detract from the work Shanus will be doing this week, but I feel separating the list of requests/reviewers will be a good move. I reckon that the more we split the duties and the less any single person has to do in a week, the better.

Sometime after 12:00GMT, Shanus will update the list of requestors. If you haven' already, check Haggard's list of stuff to review on page 138.

Plaintext version here.

At 4/13/08 11:30 AM, Haggard wrote:

Essentially, we need someone to volunteer time to maintain these lists. It would be good to have some sort of plan for the next month at least. It's all a question of who will give a bit of time.

I think I can do it for the next month or so. I then would like to update the list on Mondays, around 3pm GMT+1.
Let's see what Shanus has to say about that, as he once mentioned he planned to take over the list. ;)

I'm more than happy for either of you to do it! ;-)

I was thinking it may be an idea to give points or something to whomever updates the list of reviewers. Pros - may encourage people to do it. Cons - giving points for it might actually 'cheapen' the effort folk go to to update that list?

Hm, I don't like this idea. Might cause to much confusion for newbies, and after all this is a Club based on reviews. So I think the points should be awarded only for reviews (well, and for posting here of course, so that the club stays alive ;) ).

True. Points should be kinda simple. My other idea was that everyone get a few points if they tally their own new totals. But as they'd need to be checked, it would probably just result in duplication work.

Talking of simplifying points - here's a new suggestion. How about raising the points gained for a flash review up to 7? Originally, the difference in points was because more flash requests were being fulfilled than audio requests. This is no longer the case - it seems flash/audio have roughly the same # of reviews and eliminating the difference wouldn't be likely to change this - and I feel it's an unecessary complication. (A small complication maybe, but every little helps.)

What does everyone else think?

Audio is less attractive to fill for some people I think, so no I think having flash giving less points than audio is fine. I don't see the need in changing it personally :x

New recording, my cover of Metal by Gary Numan.

I've been reviewing lots of submissions :D

It's in my sig if you guys are nice enough ;) (You sexy beasts!)
| I'm not really gay.

At 4/13/08 03:03 PM, Alchemist94 wrote: It's in my sig if you guys are nice enough ;) (You sexy beasts!)

-Post a direct link to the submission(s) you want reviewed.

Sorry bout not replying till now, with work and a few catch up hours of sleep I couldn't get to post.

But as Bezman said I'll be starting the update in around 2 hours so I will start pullin stats then, itmay take me a couple of hours but it'll be done shortly after that. So you've got some more time, so hurry :D

Looks like I spent a little too long editing the spread sheet so I haven't finished my reviews yet. So you've got a little longer. So as long as it takes me to review is the time that's left. So make it fast :P

Hi! Could you review Tic Tac Toe Cubed for me, please? It's a flash game that I made mostly out of actionscript.

TTT^3

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4932

Here it goes, this update was full of surprises, a computer crash & just general tiredness. Oh I haven't put any of the new people on the list as the requested to be added during the week and it's only fair they get a full week to do the reviews. The update was fun. I still may do it again :P

Just tell me mistakes, I've looked through it, but it is 5AM so forgive me :P

General Rules for New Reviewers:

If you are planning on completing requests, please do the following:
-Post in this thread to let us know you plan on reviewing.
-Understand the points system and keep track of your own score.
From now on, I will only add you to the list if you post your own score after the first week.

General Rules for Requesters:

If you are planning on requesting review, please do the following:
-I will post no more than 3 requests from a single user in one week.
-Please do us a favor and respond to reviews if you request them.
-Due to the points system, you may not see reviews until up to two weeks after you request.
-Post a direct link to the submission(s) you want reviewed.
-DO NOT request without putting a link, I don't have the time or patience to get the links myself.
-DO NOT say "Review everything" for the same reason above.
-DO NOT request the same submission more than once.

Flash Requests:
9/11: The Tragedy by Zacied
BlueHippo's Birthday :0 by Bahamut
Street Fighter Series pt2 by mortis5000
Evasion - Tequila by Nick Lavrov (MinusNick)
Tutorial: Deity Whistle by sickstick
Tutorial: Overhead RPG 2 by sickstick
Jammin' for Jam by sickstick
Chalk Adventure by Goat-Man
Tic Tac Toe Cubed by CaptinChu
AnalogyOfFrozenSheep Ep 7 by FrozenSheep

Audio Requests:
Rock Inferno Minute One by Xmanne
Beaten into a Pulp (DjD) by Jakob Svensson (Mad-Muppet)
Untitled Orchestral Piece (SC) by Sam C (BreakingFaces)
Thoughts* by Jurian
Prelude pour la Gaieté by Jurian
Swimming by Jurian
Metal by BreakingFaces

Coop83's spotlight submission:
Stabika: 99 Red Balloons by Porter (Matt-Porter)

Points:
**Please also keep track of your own points. If you see something missing, I probably made a mistake**
**To be on the list, you must make at least one review, posters only will not be counted**
5 points for a review on a requested movie/game
7 points for a review on a requested audio
+1 point for putting "Review Request Club" at the bottom of a requested review
3 points for posting at least once throughout the week
5 points for referring a new member (must mention you in first post)
7 points for reviewing all requests for that week

Points | Stats | % rate | weekly| user
1. 4323 | 583/657 | 088.74 | 13/13 | Coop83
2. 3360 | 493/692 | 071.24 | 00/13 | Milinko959
3. 2605 | 335/335 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Little-Rena
4. 2384 | 317/317 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Haggard
5. 2193 | 297/313 | 094.89 | 13/13 | Shanus
6. 1679 | 235/697 | 033.72 | 12/13 | Bezman
7. 1672 | 234/309 | 075.73 | 00/13 | NintendoMadness
8. 1225 | 173/689 | 025.11 | 00/13 | lmacow
9. 1204 | 187/262 | 071.37 | 01/13 | CyberDevil
10. 995 | 133/207 | 064.25 | 00/13 | WritersBlock
11. 918 | 117/234 | 050.00 | 00/13 | Jurian
12. 792 | 100/100 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Shadow-1409
13. 706 | 091/282 | 032.27 | 00/13 | AnalPenguinFarming
14. 582 | 078/299 | 026.09 | 00/13 | Sir-Nuts
15. 488 | 057/280 | 020.36 | 00/13 | aldlv
16. 412 | 051/226 | 022.57 | 00/13 | LilFugitive
17. 363 | 044/162 | 027.16 | 00/13 | Suspended-3rd-Chord
18. 331 | 047/524 | 008.97 | 00/13 | Auz
19. 215 | 025/113 | 022.12 | 00/13 | GronmonSE
20. 212 | 027/212 | 012.74 | 00/13 | Ragnarokia
21. 184 | 025/078 | 032.05 | 00/13 | mac2130
22. 174 | 023/062 | 037.10 | 00/13 | PicosGhost
23. 109 | 022/116 | 018.97 | 00/13 | yoshi77777
24. 68 | 011/118 | 009.32 | 00/13 | Bearkillr
25. 65 | 014/078 | 017.95 | 00/13 | cristianedu
26. 36 | 004/053 | 007.55 | 01/13 | Mad-Muppet

Requests this week: 13
Total all time: 697
Review this Week: 79
Average per member: 3.04
Average per movie: 6.08

New To the List:
None

Leaving the List :( :
None

All Requests Completed:
Coop83, Little-Rena, Haggard, Shanus, Shadow-1409

At 4/13/08 11:55 PM, Shanus wrote: Here it goes, this update was full of surprises, a computer crash & just general tiredness. Oh I haven't put any of the new people on the list as the requested to be added during the week and it's only fair they get a full week to do the reviews. The update was fun. I still may do it again :P

Just tell me mistakes, I've looked through it, but it is 5AM so forgive me :P

I cant see any mistakes, well, not with my stuff anyway :P

General Rules for New Reviewers:

If you are planning on completing requests, please do the following:
-Post in this thread to let us know you plan on reviewing.
-Understand the points system and keep track of your own score.
From now on, I will only add you to the list if you post your own score after the first week.

General Rules for Requesters:

If you are planning on requesting review, please do the following:
-I will post no more than 3 requests from a single user in one week.
-Please do us a favor and respond to reviews if you request them.
-Due to the points system, you may not see reviews until up to two weeks after you request.
-Post a direct link to the submission(s) you want reviewed.
-DO NOT request without putting a link, I don't have the time or patience to get the links myself.
-DO NOT say "Review everything" for the same reason above.
-DO NOT request the same submission more than once.

Flash Requests:

I see you added more to this than was on the previous update today. :D

12. 792 | 100/100 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Shadow-1409

Sweet still at 100%, lol, ive done exactly 100 requests as well it seems, wierd!!

Requests this week: 13
Total all time: 697
Review this Week: 79
Average per member: 3.04
Average per movie: 6.08

Shitty per member, but per movie is better than last weeks. :(

All Requests Completed:
Coop83, Little-Rena, Haggard, Shanus, Shadow-1409

Congrats to everyone here.

Just wanna say well done Shanus for a good update, we all appriciate it and if you wanna do it again, feel free :P

At 4/13/08 11:55 PM, Shanus wrote: Just tell me mistakes, I've looked through it, but it is 5AM so forgive me :P

As far as I can see, there's nothing wrong. Thanks! :)

Flash Requests:
Audio Requests:

Oh, so you made a request list of your own. Hmm...
If I make the update again next monday, we'll have to decide on which list the data should be based on -_-

Points | Stats | % rate | weekly| user
1. 4323 | 583/657 | 088.74 | 13/13 | Coop83
2. 3360 | 493/692 | 071.24 | 00/13 | Milinko959
3. 2605 | 335/335 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Little-Rena
4. 2384 | 317/317 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Haggard
5. 2193 | 297/313 | 094.89 | 13/13 | Shanus

Nothing new in the top 5. It's still a long way for Little-Rena and me before we can even think about passing Milinko.

Average per member: 3.04

Whoa, that's pretty shitty...

Average per movie: 6.08

Better than last week, but still far away from this clubs best.

All Requests Completed:
Coop83, Little-Rena, Haggard, Shanus, Shadow-1409

A small party, but I'm proud to still be a part of it.
Also congrats to Coop, Little-Rena, Shanus and Shadow! You guys are doing a great job!

At 4/13/08 11:55 PM, Shanus wrote: The update was fun. I still may do it again :P

You'd certainly be doing the club a favour if you commit to it for a while! :-D

We need to organise the maintenance.

Flash Requests:
9/11: The Tragedy by Zacied
BlueHippo's Birthday :0 by Bahamut

If we're separating the list of list of requests from the list of reviewers, there's no point in doing a new list with the list of reviewers . That just sorta makes it confusing (which list to use?) and eliminates the advantage of folk being given over a week to do reviews.

Essentially, we need to make a decision of whether to separate the lists or not. If you have a reason for not,
we can reconsider splitting. If we are splitting the lists though, it'd make more sense for only one list of requests to be posted each week.

Anyway, for next week, it seems simpler to count your list as the official one imo.

Points | Stats | % rate | weekly| user
1. 4323 | 583/657 | 088.74 | 13/13 | Coop83
2. 3360 | 493/692 | 071.24 | 00/13 | Milinko959
3. 2605 | 335/335 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Little-Rena
4. 2384 | 317/317 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Haggard
5. 2193 | 297/313 | 094.89 | 13/13 | Shanus
6. 1679 | 235/697 | 033.72 | 12/13 | Bezman
7. 1672 | 234/309 | 075.73 | 00/13 | NintendoMadness
8. 1225 | 173/689 | 025.11 | 00/13 | lmacow
9. 1204 | 187/262 | 071.37 | 01/13 | CyberDevil
10. 995 | 133/207 | 064.25 | 00/13 | WritersBlock
11. 918 | 117/234 | 050.00 | 00/13 | Jurian
12. 792 | 100/100 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Shadow-1409
13. 706 | 091/282 | 032.27 | 00/13 | AnalPenguinFarming
14. 582 | 078/299 | 026.09 | 00/13 | Sir-Nuts
15. 488 | 057/280 | 020.36 | 00/13 | aldlv
16. 412 | 051/226 | 022.57 | 00/13 | LilFugitive
17. 363 | 044/162 | 027.16 | 00/13 | Suspended-3rd-Chord
18. 331 | 047/524 | 008.97 | 00/13 | Auz
19. 215 | 025/113 | 022.12 | 00/13 | GronmonSE
20. 212 | 027/212 | 012.74 | 00/13 | Ragnarokia
21. 184 | 025/078 | 032.05 | 00/13 | mac2130
22. 174 | 023/062 | 037.10 | 00/13 | PicosGhost
23. 109 | 022/116 | 018.97 | 00/13 | yoshi77777
24. 68 | 011/118 | 009.32 | 00/13 | Bearkillr
25. 65 | 014/078 | 017.95 | 00/13 | cristianedu
26. 36 | 004/053 | 007.55 | 01/13 | Mad-Muppet

Hrm... other than the 5 completists, myself, Mad-Muppet and CD, everyone seems to be away.

I reckon we should agree on a system for dropping people in the list and have all maintainers stick to it. Dropping people for inactivity encourages activity, clears up the list and also makes future updates slightly simpler.

All Requests Completed:
Coop83, Little-Rena, Haggard, Shanus, Shadow-1409

Congrats.

At 4/13/08 01:29 PM, Little-Rena wrote: Audio is less attractive to fill for some people I think, so no I think having flash giving less points than audio is fine. I don't see the need in changing it personally :x

Hrm. Now you mention it, I remember you saying you didn't like doing audio requests as much. If that's the general consensus, I guess the points system is perfect.

I personally enjoy both about equally. How do others feel?

I just felt saying,
'7 points for reviewing a movie/game/audio on the previous list'
is simpler than
'5 points for a review on a requested movie/game
7 points for a review on a requested audio'

I suppose it doesn't make much difference, but would still like to know what others think.

At 4/14/08 06:52 AM, Bezman wrote:

Points | Stats | % rate | weekly| user
1. 4323 | 583/657 | 088.74 | 13/13 | Coop83
2. 3360 | 493/692 | 071.24 | 00/13 | Milinko959
3. 2605 | 335/335 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Little-Rena
4. 2384 | 317/317 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Haggard
5. 2193 | 297/313 | 094.89 | 13/13 | Shanus
6. 1679 | 235/697 | 033.72 | 12/13 | Bezman
7. 1672 | 234/309 | 075.73 | 00/13 | NintendoMadness
8. 1225 | 173/689 | 025.11 | 00/13 | lmacow
9. 1204 | 187/262 | 071.37 | 01/13 | CyberDevil
10. 995 | 133/207 | 064.25 | 00/13 | WritersBlock
11. 918 | 117/234 | 050.00 | 00/13 | Jurian
12. 792 | 100/100 | 100,00 | 13/13 | Shadow-1409
13. 706 | 091/282 | 032.27 | 00/13 | AnalPenguinFarming
14. 582 | 078/299 | 026.09 | 00/13 | Sir-Nuts
15. 488 | 057/280 | 020.36 | 00/13 | aldlv
16. 412 | 051/226 | 022.57 | 00/13 | LilFugitive
17. 363 | 044/162 | 027.16 | 00/13 | Suspended-3rd-Chord
18. 331 | 047/524 | 008.97 | 00/13 | Auz
19. 215 | 025/113 | 022.12 | 00/13 | GronmonSE
20. 212 | 027/212 | 012.74 | 00/13 | Ragnarokia
21. 184 | 025/078 | 032.05 | 00/13 | mac2130
22. 174 | 023/062 | 037.10 | 00/13 | PicosGhost
23. 109 | 022/116 | 018.97 | 00/13 | yoshi77777
24. 68 | 011/118 | 009.32 | 00/13 | Bearkillr
25. 65 | 014/078 | 017.95 | 00/13 | cristianedu
26. 36 | 004/053 | 007.55 | 01/13 | Mad-Muppet

Hrm... other than the 5 completists, myself, Mad-Muppet and CD, everyone seems to be away.

I reckon we should agree on a system for dropping people in the list and have all maintainers stick to it. Dropping people for inactivity encourages activity, clears up the list and also makes future updates slightly simpler.

We should go for completion rate as well as activity here in the thread.
If a user drops below a certain completion rate we should drop him from the list. However, if the user is active here in this thread, he shouldn't be dropped. Also, if a user has gained points in the last two or three weeks, he too stays on the list.
Also I would never drop milinko from the list (for reasons that are obvious, I think ;) ).

Summary:
Delete a user from the list if:
- Completion rate drops below 10%
- Hasn't gained points for 3 weeks (which includes posting as well as reviewing)

If both are true, drop the user.

At 4/13/08 01:29 PM, Little-Rena wrote: Audio is less attractive to fill for some people I think, so no I think having flash giving less points than audio is fine. I don't see the need in changing it personally :x

Hrm. Now you mention it, I remember you saying you didn't like doing audio requests as much. If that's the general consensus, I guess the points system is perfect.

I too think more points for audio requests is better, because it seems less attractive to some users. More points might encourage some to still write some reivews.

Hrm... other than the 5 completists, myself, Mad-Muppet and CD, everyone seems to be away.

yeah, there seems to be a lack of activity throughout the whole list, whered everyone go :(

I reckon we should agree on a system for dropping people in the list and have all maintainers stick to it. Dropping people for inactivity encourages activity, clears up the list and also makes future updates slightly simpler.

Exactly, theres no point in having 5 or 10 users who only do 1 request per week or dont do any for a number of weeks, wither do more reviews or you'll drop off the list ^_^

If a user drops below a certain completion rate we should drop him from the list. However, if the user is active here in this thread, he shouldn't be dropped.

Good idea. ^_^

Also I would never drop milinko from the list (for reasons that are obvious, I think ;) ).

Well we cant take him off, what if he mysteriously returns one day in the not so near future only to discover we bumped him off, not to mention he'll prob stay near the top of the list with the current activity of the club users >:(

Audio is less attractive to fill for some people I think.

I wouldnt say its less attractive, but more difficult lol, its harder to write a decent review on an audio
than it is a flash, unless you know what your talking about musically. :P

At 4/14/08 01:03 PM, Shadow-1409 wrote:

Also I would never drop milinko from the list (for reasons that are obvious, I think ;) ).

Well we cant take him off, what if he mysteriously returns one day in the not so near future only to discover we bumped him off, not to mention he'll prob stay near the top of the list with the current activity of the club users >:(

I wouldn't take him off the list because he turned the club into what it is now. He IS the RRC in some way. ;)

Audio is less attractive to fill for some people I think.

I wouldnt say its less attractive, but more difficult lol, its harder to write a decent review on an audio
than it is a flash, unless you know what your talking about musically. :P

Heh, good thing that I can play the guitar and know a thing or two about music in general. ^^

New song. :)

Sorry bout not saying anything yesterday busy day. But I thought that it was only fair to the requesters that I included all that I could sorry bout the confusion.

Oh and I thought I'd make the spread sheet a little user friendly, now only a few things need to be entered. Hopefully I improved it and didn't confuse things. There are 3 pages, one for entering the amount of reviews done that week & then a percentage page. Where some small amount of numbers need to be entered. The last page can just be copied straight into the post. This will save time, well hopefully. Just check it out see what ya think :P

UPDATED FILE

At 4/15/08 10:20 AM, Shanus wrote: Just check it out see what ya think :P

UPDATED FILE

Looks nice :) .

I didn't feel like improving the spreadsheet (well, except for the formulas) for just one update. But seeing as I might update the list again your improvements come in very handy! ;)

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1 37712
Soft piano playing.
Feedback is, as always, appreciated.

General Rules for New Reviewers:

If you are planning on completing requests, please do the following:
-Post in this thread to let us know you plan on reviewing.
-Understand the points system and keep track of your own score.
From now on, you may only be added to the list if you post your own score after the first week.

General Rules for Requesters:

If you are planning on requesting review, please do the following:
-I will post no more than 3 requests from a single user in one week.
-Please do us a favor and respond to reviews if you request them.
-Due to the points system, you may not see reviews until up to two weeks after you request.
-Post a direct link to the submission(s) you want reviewed.
-DO NOT request without putting a link, I don't have the time or patience to get the links myself.
-DO NOT say "Review everything" for the same reason above.
-DO NOT request the same submission more than once.

----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
-------------------------
Btw - here's another suggestion. Do you guys think it might be worth one of the first few folk to post on each page posting the rules?

Pros:

++++_ allows requesters/reviewers to see the rules quickly even by just reading the last page.
++___ It gives everyone something to do. Might help build community if folk enjoy doing this little thing for the club. (Everyone feels like they are chipping into the thread, even if it's just a few seconds work?)

Cons:

- - ___ Maybe requestors should be at least somewhat care about getting reviews? The rules are maybe in place as much to weed out folk who don't particularly care about our input as they are for our convenience?
- ____ Might get annoying to do
- ____ Might clutter up the page slightly?

Are there arguments I haven't thought of? What are your opinions?

Shit. Sorry for triple-posting. (!!!)

But who is doing the update? It sounds like both of Haggard and Shanus are up for it. It might be worth it to make a decision.

Having someone do it for a month or so then pass it on might work better, as if the person doing any single task is changing at a regular but infrequent rate, it might help stimulate some energy? Just a 'feeling'.

At 4/15/08 01:39 PM, Haggard wrote: Looks nice :) .
I didn't feel like improving the spreadsheet (well, except for the formulas) for just one update. But seeing as I might update the list again your improvements come in very handy! ;)

Yeah, I thought I might do it, just because it needed to be done & makes things alot faster.

At 4/16/08 06:43 AM, Bezman wrote: NEW REVIEW GUIDLINES

It's looking good. But I was just thinking if someone posted on every page, wouldn't that in some peoples eyes just be seen as spam. But I'd say if whenever a new page was reached someone could write them out & reply to earlier posts made by people.

TO DO WITH WHO WILL BE DOING THE UPDATE

Well I'm going to be doing college exams soon. Then be off for bout a month then going on holidays so that may work out. Just have to see what Haggard says