At 6/22/08 12:44 PM, ThePsychoSheep wrote:
Damn I forgot reat me in
-Alias
4/10. It's too long, and unmemorable. It seems like it's trying to be somewhat amusing, but it's not.
-Profile pic
5/10. Pretty dull drawing complimented by a very boring and generic background. The drawing could do without the white backing.
-B\P
3/10. You're doing better than me, but that's not saying much; it's not a statistic that I care much about. I've seen a lot of people with more B/P than you.
-Forum signature
1/10. Dull, dull, dull. A very boring and poorly integrated close up with strangely, badly whited out eyes. A boring straight black background, and some generic text with a bit of a glow which manages to spell your name wrong. And to top it off, it doesn't extend to the end of the signature area. A poor signature overall. The text is pretty bad also.
-Banner
2/10. Dull, boring, generic brushes used to do the same background as in the profile picture, which attempt to carry on your silly dark theme you've got for all your pictures. Manages to spell your name right, but the text remains poorly integrated.
---
So, ratings eh?
I'd like to be "rated".
Let's see, what are some things to be "rated" on that wouldn't be useless, like stats...
I'd like to have my pictures "rated", since you know I'd like to keep my design nice and pretty so as to not make a bad impression on people. You know:
Banner
Profile picture
Icon
Signature
That sort of thing.
And I'd just like to have my overall person rated. Always good to know what people think of you as a person.