Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/10/03 03:38 AM, Shrapnel wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:36 AM, DracoShadowfire wrote:

your point mister level 30?

Here's a point for you from a level 29.

i dont get it

At 1/10/03 03:36 AM, DracoShadowfire wrote:
your point mister level 30?

Well, the gills didn't make sense. How did he give her air under water? From what I know, water is drawn over the gills, and gas exchange occurs between the capillaries found within the gills (yes, I know I'm skipping details). At no point should this gas enter his lungs. There is no way he could have supplied her any oxygen to breath.

That's my point.

At 1/10/03 03:44 AM, DracoShadowfire wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:38 AM, Shrapnel wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:36 AM, DracoShadowfire wrote:

your point mister level 30?

Here's a point for you from a level 29.

i dont get it

The point was the TIP OF HIS PENIS YOU MORON.

Minus the moron part.

{{DracoShadowfire}}

At 1/10/03 03:50 AM, humantarget52 wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:36 AM, DracoShadowfire wrote:
your point mister level 30?

Well, the gills didn't make sense. How did he give her air under water? From what I know, water is drawn over the gills, and gas exchange occurs between the capillaries found within the gills (yes, I know I'm skipping details). At no point should this gas enter his lungs. There is no way he could have supplied her any oxygen to breath.

That's my point.

He had gills and lungs though, they could have been connected and function in a way that regular gills would be unable to.

At 1/10/03 03:41 AM, b_repay wrote: Speaking of shitty Kevin Costner movies,

I liked The Postman.

I saw that one too!

I didn't like it.

Speaking of movies I don't like. Deep Blue Sea sucked too.

At 1/10/03 03:50 AM, humantarget52 wrote: There is no way he could have supplied her any oxygen to breath.

That's my point.

Well I suppose if he switched to gill breathing right away and kept a volume of air in his lungs then he could supply her with a small amount of oxygen if and only if he shunted blood away from his capillaries.

He he shunted it, he could give her 21% O2.
If he didn't, he'd absorb 5% of it and breathe out 16% O2 to her and it'd decrease with each breathe of course.

Point is, THAT WHOLE SCENE SUCKED.

DAMN YOU WATERWORLD.

At 1/10/03 03:52 AM, b_repay wrote:

He had gills and lungs though, they could have been connected and function in a way that regular gills would be unable to.

Dude, do you even know how gills work?
I'm not a biologist but even I know that the oxygen difuses into the bloodstream.

Are you saying his oxygenated blood difuses into some gaseous environment for the sole sake of giving another species oxygen?

Maybe if he fucking connected his bloodstream with hers and setup something similar to placental circulation.

{{b_repay}}

Waterworld this and gills that...

(Tayv just wants huggles from Shrap ^_^)

At 1/10/03 03:52 AM, b_repay wrote:

::

He had gills and lungs though, they could have been connected and function in a way that regular gills would be unable to.

Well, he is a mutant, but I'm only willing to give the writer(s) so much creative liberty.

Having his gills connected to his lungs would make for a horrid adaptation. If he required lung ventilation during submergence, and his only source of oxygen was derived from gill ventilation, this would mean that the oxygen that diffuses into his circulation from his gills would need to diffuse out of his blood into his lungs, only to diffuse right back into his blood stream again.

Utter shite!

At 1/10/03 03:58 AM, Shrapnel wrote: Dude, do you even know how gills work?

I do not know how gills work, no.

Maybe Wade should restrict the amount of 0 votes a user can give per day. This would stop people from going through the portal and continuously blamming movies, while keeping the Blam system intact. It won't stop users from voting 0 on something they really hate, but it could also help to stop the high number of Blams per day.

ah fuck, I didn't know that was the movie he was pulling a sting on, damn't I played that and the grpahics were choppy, no sound really, and juss a bit too hard, and it froze at the night vision idol part, i hope when i log into to my email, there isn't an emailing saying that my account been terminated, and that my IP was logged and that he's sending me the computer hard drive rape virus, and i hope he isn't planning on mustard gassing us
Let's list some similarities of the 2...

Saddam: Vote for him or die
Wade: Vote high or die
Saddam: Gassed his own residents for fun
Wade: Threatening to do the same
Saddam: Dictator
Wade: Power Hungry Webmaster
Saddam: Has biological weapons
Wade: Trying to harvest the stinky stuff from his sock to form a crude biological weapon
Saddam: Wants nukes
Wade: Wants all people to be nice and play fair
Saddam: Willing to kill people to set examples
Wade: Willing to ban to set examples
SoDamnInsane: Is just being an asshole
Wade: ... (to afraid to say anything here for obvious reasons)

i saw the tittle of the post, jumped straight to the last page and was greated by a discussion about the postman. What the hell happend?

LOL SPYRE!!! FUNNY ASS SIGNATURE

At 1/10/03 04:10 AM, Spyre wrote: i saw the tittle of the post, jumped straight to the last page and was greated by a discussion about the postman. What the hell happend?

Have you seen The Postman? I thought it was terrible.

At 1/9/03 07:19 PM, Shrapnel wrote: Waterworld.

Holy shit did that movie suck.

It's a perfect example of a movie where a lot of time and money was spent creating a total flop.

Holy shit, i loved that movie (seriously). I bet you didnt even watch it, you tasty shankasaurus.

I think for the voting system you should be able to vote thumbs up or thumbs down, BUT keep the "blow the whistle" thing, and use that to flag movies. Have Wade watch them, cause he has nothing else to do, then have him decide if the flagged movie should be deleted.

Or just fuck voting altogether. Just keep blow the whistle to remove autovoters, stolen movies, and pop up spawners. Like he said earlier, any crap movie will just sink to the bottom of the portal, no harm in that. Rank movies in the Top 50 by reviews.

I like my 2nd idea better.

The Postman was horrible, so dont think i like Kevin Costner or anything. I wonder if i can get Waterworld on DVD for like $3.

OH YEA

Experience would be obtained just by logging into your account and depositing. Still 10 a day. Its not like voting on movies gives you additional XP or anything.

At 1/10/03 04:05 AM, b_repay wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:58 AM, Shrapnel wrote: Dude, do you even know how gills work?

I do not know how gills work, no.

That's ok.

Now tell me, what the fuck is that kid in the movie?

Is it a girl or a boy?

If Dennis Hopper rapted it, we'd know cause we'd either see a penis or no penis.

At 1/10/03 04:27 AM, TannerCenterwall wrote:

At 1/9/03 07:19 PM, Shrapnel wrote: Waterworld.

Holy shit did that movie suck.

It's a perfect example of a movie where a lot of time and money was spent creating a total flop.

Holy shit, i loved that movie (seriously). I bet you didnt even watch it, you tasty shankasaurus.

!
There just wasn't enough shooting and killing and stuff. There was just so much more they could've done in that movie.

It was like Dragonheart... a big disappointment.
An ok movie but an entire fantasy world that wasn't explored enough.

Maybe if Kevin took off his clothes to reveal he was hung like a dolphin and then jizzed all over Jeanne Tripplehorn's bare breasts... then it would be an awesome movie.

Haha, this thread straight got HIJACKED.

At 1/10/03 04:30 AM, Shrapnel wrote:

At 1/10/03 04:05 AM, b_repay wrote:

At 1/10/03 03:58 AM, Shrapnel wrote: Dude, do you even know how gills work?

I do not know how gills work, no.

That's ok.

Now tell me, what the fuck is that kid in the movie?

Is it a girl or a boy?

I think that thing was Tina Majorino. She was also in Andre. Arf Arf Arf

At 1/10/03 04:41 AM, HAQnSPITT wrote:

I think that thing was Tina Majorino. She was also in Andre. Arf Arf Arf

Oh man, I completely forgot about that movie...

THANKS A LOT.

hey, uh, what... about... my... post... no one has mentioned it **cries**

At 1/9/03 03:58 PM, Valz wrote:

From :
Wade Fulp <wade@newgrounds.com>

To :
valz

Is there a reason you gave the Monkey Island game a 0? If you continue to vote down quality submissions your account will be terminated.

Regards,



Wade Fulp

thats fucked up

At 1/9/03 04:04 PM, Shrapnel wrote: I smell spoofed e-mail.

I don't see why Wade would do that.

Umm he did i got that too!

whoa whoa whoa, back the train up...Postman sucked and waterworld was merely ok, but drangon heart was a sweet movie, come on sean Connery is awesome

Wade is a dictator, 'nuff sed.

oh yeah, and the whole point with the voting 0's...I think we all see his point, its a very valid point, but the threating of banning is a little much, maybe even a lot much, if you tell people how to vote, your a dictator and there should be no voting, but the counter point is, look at all you bastards voting zero's on good flash animations, what is he to do?

At 1/10/03 07:40 AM, TheHoggle wrote: oh yeah, and the whole point with the voting 0's...I think we all see his point, its a very valid point, but the threating of banning is a little much, maybe even a lot much, if you tell people how to vote, your a dictator and there should be no voting, but the counter point is, look at all you bastards voting zero's on good flash animations, what is he to do?

He could always just quit worrying about it and let people bitch like they have always done.

If it is a small group of people like he said in his post on NG's front page, then it should not be that hard to go get them and ask them to please review the movies. I think if he were to take an hour or two and compile a list of everyone voting all zero's and post it in an "NG's hall of shame" or something, it would be no big deal. I actually feel that if he is going to do all of this that he should consider doing the same thing for people who vote all 5's on shitty flash as well as people who vote all 0's on good flash.

And whoever posted this pic earlier, that is sweet.

but what about good flash that gets blammed because of all the godless pricks that don't care and just want blame points?? perhaps the judging limit should be raised or something