Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Yeah, Gays have hitten on me and I didn't mind. I mean that is just the way they are. It is not like he tried to rape me. They are actually really nice people too!

Why are you against gay marriage? Is it because the sanctity of marriage will be broken , I don't think that is right though. It is a free country and there is a seperation of church and state. I don't see it as morally wrong, I mean what harm is it doing? No one is dying from it, and if it makes them happy then why not?

ther is nothing wrong with homosexuals,the only differnce is ther sexuallity,the're ussaly just like every other guy/gurl,as long as they dont go all hitting on me and stuff I'm not botherd by them

At 2/8/06 01:05 PM, Jeremy092387 wrote: No one is dying from it,

Wait, wait wait, ever hear of aids?

nothing against homosexuals. i do however hate people who act really camp, i mean, theres just no need to look like an irritating prick just because your gay.

To people who mention cross-dressing; homosexuality and transexuality are two very different things.

At 2/8/06 03:01 PM, ThebanLegion wrote:

At 2/8/06 01:05 PM, Jeremy092387 wrote: No one is dying from it,

Wait, wait wait, ever hear of aids?

Surely you aren't implying that AIDs is a homosexual disease?

I have nothing against homosexuals; just homosexuality

At 2/8/06 04:06 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: I have nothing against homosexuals; just homosexuality

And why is that?

At 2/8/06 04:08 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:06 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: I have nothing against homosexuals; just homosexuality

And why is that?

Why not?

At 2/8/06 04:16 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:08 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:06 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: I have nothing against homosexuals; just homosexuality

And why is that?

Why not?

Because there is no scientific evidence connecting homosexuality to pedophilia, other then thrown together half-truths and lies from people who want justification to hate.

And on that note; what does Karl Marx have to do with all that?

At 2/8/06 04:16 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:08 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:06 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: I have nothing against homosexuals; just homosexuality

And why is that?

Why not?

Forgive me for merely skimming the Crock of, um, sorce, but that seems to argue against gay pedophilia. I'm with you all the way against pedophilia, gay or otherwise, but that article is meaningless to the overall discussion.

At 2/8/06 04:02 PM, altanese_mistress wrote: Surely you aren't implying that AIDs is a homosexual disease?

No of course not, AIDs is only one of many diseases that can be caused by acts of homosexuality. It isn't specific to gays, but it can be a result of sodomy.

Sorry about that.

Here's what I meant to post.

At 2/8/06 04:27 PM, ThebanLegion wrote: No of course not, AIDs is only one of many diseases that can be caused by acts of homosexuality.

There is absolutly no disease that cares about sexuality, so your argument isn't against homosexuality but physical acts of lust altogether.

It isn't specific to gays, but it can be a result of sodomy.

so-do-my : n. : Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.

The anal intercourse hold water, but this is just personal beliefs and not restricted to homosexual sex. It also has nothing to do with sex between females, and not even required for sex between men. Not to mention that two people of the same gender can be totally in love and never have sex; same goes for hetrosexuals.

And about homosexuality as possibly being 'unnatural or abnormal, remember that at least 10% of nature is homosexual. I think more....

At 2/8/06 04:27 PM, ThebanLegion wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:02 PM, altanese_mistress wrote: Surely you aren't implying that AIDs is a homosexual disease?

No of course not, AIDs is only one of many diseases that can be caused by acts of homosexuality. It isn't specific to gays, but it can be a result of sodomy.

Really?
Many diseases caused by acts of homosexuality?

As far as I can tell, loving a person of the same gender does not cause disease. In fact, even having sex with them can't cause a disease. Certain diseases can be spread though sexual intercourse, but these diseases make no deferentiation for the gender of the carrier nor of the recipient.

In short: Your post is entirely ignorant.

At 2/8/06 04:30 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Sorry about that.

Here's what I meant to post.

About these 'facts' :

1: There is no -conclusive- proof to sexuality being genetic, but theres no proof whatsoever to any sort of divine being.

2: The highest number of STDs and the highest growing rate is among hetrosexuals.

3: While it is true that it CAN be caused by childhood experiences, that doesn't mean this is always the case. I know many homosexuals whom come from perfectly normal homes with loving, caring families.

4: This is where the 'facts' show a bit of religious propaganda, and where I become depressed knowing there are people whom would deny who they are and become the biggest boggots against non-hetrosexuality just because its been beaten into their heads that who they really are is pure evil.

5: And here is where the 'facts' are fully revealed to be made by people with a bias.
Anyways, heres my own link: http://www.keithboyk..com/arch/000479.html

And also, remember; there are many Christian churches whom openly accept homosexuality and perform homosexual MARRIAGE. Not 'civil union', but marriage in a Christian church, with the crusafix right behind the reverend.

At 2/8/06 04:47 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 2/8/06 04:30 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Sorry about that.

Here's what I meant to post.

About these 'facts' :

1: There is no -conclusive- proof to sexuality being genetic, but theres no proof whatsoever to any sort of divine being.

Don't try to change the subject.

2: The highest number of STDs and the highest growing rate is among hetrosexuals.

Evidence?

4: This is where the 'facts' show a bit of religious propaganda, and where I become depressed knowing there are people whom would deny who they are and become the biggest boggots against non-hetrosexuality just because its been beaten into their heads that who they really are is pure evil.

What is "tolerance"?

5: And here is where the 'facts' are fully revealed to be made by people with a bias.
Anyways, heres my own link: http://www.keithboyk..com/arch/000479.html

The person who made that page- when talking about Sodom and Gomorrah in- Ezekiel 16:49 -forgot about Jude 7.

And also, remember; there are many Christian churches whom openly accept homosexuality and perform homosexual MARRIAGE. Not 'civil union', but marriage in a Christian church, with the crusafix right behind the reverend.

The Bible does mention of a "falling away" in 1Timothy 4:1.

At 2/8/06 05:03 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: The Bible does mention of a "falling away" in 1Timothy 4:1.

And every church of the world accuses one another for the same thing...
Oh wells,

kuddos

Its probably worth bearing this in mind

52% of identical twins (ie identical DNA, same upbringing) are gay if one is gay

22% of fraternal twins (ie different DNA, same upbringing) are gay if one is gay

This pretty much proves that homosexuality is partly to do with genetics, and partly to do with upbringing.

Proof

Why should we as a socitey care how a group of individuals (gay or lesbian) live thier lives, as long as thier not harming anyone or breaking any laws (not counting stupid laws that shouldnt exist, but thats somethnig else), they should be free to live thier lives as they see fit. It means less competiiton for us straight ppl, & if it pisses off the christian right im all for it!

I wonder what Steven Herman would say about this.

At 2/8/06 05:03 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Don't try to change the subject.

You're the one giving a link stating there is no evidince to something, when their own bias has no evidence.

Evidence?

AEGIS (or some other AIDS awarness program) speakers at my school, and many other awarness programs. And before you mention a bias, where I'm from to even be considered homosexual will ensure constant insults and daily beatings.

What is "tolerance"?

Clearly something people whom use the Bible to justify hate do not understand.

The person who made that page- when talking about Sodom and Gomorrah in- Ezekiel 16:49 -forgot about Jude 7.

No mention of homosexuality.

The Bible does mention of a "falling away" in 1Timothy 4:1.

There are two things to consider:
First, the Bible has been changed throughout the centuries by various Popes before the Protestant Movement when the only Christianity was Catholicism.
Second, ever thing maybe the current 'Christians' with prejiduce close to their hearts are the heritics claiming to be working for God? That it is THEY whom shall usher in the Last Days and bring the anti-Christ to power?

At 2/8/06 05:13 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: I wonder what Steven Herman would say about this.

Meanwhile, the rest of us wonder why you hide behind such farce.

Straight Aids Myth Shattered

At 2/8/06 04:33 PM, altanese_mistress wrote: There is absolutly no disease that cares about sexuality, so your argument isn't against homosexuality but physical acts of lust altogether.

I didn't want to get into graphic detail, I just assumed that you would know what I meant by "acts of homosexuality," since nothing else seems to be getting the point accross, I meant BUTT SEX!

And about homosexuality as possibly being 'unnatural or abnormal, remember that at least 10% of nature is homosexual. I think more....

How so? (I'm genuinely curious to see what exactly you're talking about.)

At 2/8/06 04:45 PM, bakem0n0 wrote: Really?
Many diseases caused by acts of homosexuality?

As far as I can tell, loving a person of the same gender does not cause disease. In fact, even having sex with them can't cause a disease. Certain diseases can be spread though sexual intercourse, but these diseases make no deferentiation for the gender of the carrier nor of the recipient.

Again, I meant BUTT SEX. Diseases can be spread through sexual intorcourse of any kind, there is no doubt there. Those who would perform BUTT SEX are at a higher risk because of the the bacteria contained within the large intestine. Not to mention the foreskin on uncircumcised males is as sceceptible to infection as the lining of the large intestine.

At 2/8/06 05:22 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Straight Aids Myth Shattered

Only had to read the first couple paragraphs to know that this too is biased and put together with half-truths and lies. o_O And on that note, why not type out your own opinions in your own words instead of just posting links. Links with crappy articles I might add.

MatthewTheLion-- you're a StevenHerman ALT...

I recognized several the links you posted.

At 2/8/06 05:22 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Straight Aids Myth Shattered

Hokay, so, you wish you prove that a straight person is less likely to get aids than a gay.

Your source presents one fact "A disease-free man who has unprotected sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting HIV."

It says nothing about the chance of a disease-free man and a drug-free man.

If you are going to use statistics find comparable statistics. Until then, shut up.

At 2/8/06 05:25 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

At 2/8/06 05:22 PM, MatthewTheLion wrote: Straight Aids Myth Shattered

Only had to read the first couple paragraphs to know that this too is biased and put together with half-truths and lies.

You really are full of shit because I see no such things in the article.

At 2/8/06 05:26 PM, fli wrote: MatthewTheLion-- you're a StevenHerman ALT...

I recognized several the links you posted.

I am not.

I do however get a good laugh out of the things he posts.