Denmark... next bomb victum -.-

[Antareus]

Well not yet, but the way the arabians are reacting to the images made by "jyllands posten" is getting out of hand. Sure its offensive but its also just a harmless joke (as in not suppose to get people mad) thats not supposed to be taken seriously. I can understand that the muslims are mad though... but violence is not the fucking answer. If they just realised that if they actually commited one of their acts like they have claimmed that they would ( bomb denmark) then they wouldnt just kill a great deal of innocent people but also make it worse for the muslims living in denmark! Most of these immigrants even rely on taxes to survive, do you think they will rise if denmark is bombed? no, the exact opposite. anyway im rele pissed atm, im not sure how much sense i made but anyway, tell me this: Is violence rele the only way that these people understand?

PS i am a danish citizen.

[Chumbawamba]

Heard about this in my Bio class. We have a foreign exchange student at my school named Atle, and he was really pissed (kicking desks, probably swearing in Danish) when he first got the news.

[Antareus]

At 2/5/06 03:58 PM, Chumbawamba wrote: Heard about this in my Bio class. We have a foreign exchange student at my school named Atle, and he was really pissed (kicking desks, probably swearing in Danish) when he first got the news.

Pretty much how i reacted, i cant believe how stupid these people are?! but then again, i dont know how much they know about whats going on outside of their country. But atm, if they bomb me then im fucking bombing them. not literally but thats how i feel.

[seventy-one]

At 2/5/06 03:56 PM, Coolblue305 wrote: Sure its offensive but its also just a harmless joke (as in not suppose to get people mad) thats not supposed to be taken seriously.

I think its quite the opposite, I think it was intended to incite the hatred of muslims all over the world.

But I agree violence is not the answer, protests sure, but when they become violent they're worse.

[Antareus]

At 2/5/06 04:16 PM, seventy-one wrote:

At 2/5/06 03:56 PM, Coolblue305 wrote: Sure its offensive but its also just a harmless joke (as in not suppose to get people mad) thats not supposed to be taken seriously.

I think its quite the opposite, I think it was intended to incite the hatred of muslims all over the world.

But I agree violence is not the answer, protests sure, but when they become violent they're worse.

Well this is a news papir who always joke about something, they even made fun of our prime minister whose now down in India i think it is, defending that news papir and their freedom of speech. I mean have you ever heard a joke about jesus before? i bet you have, but have you ever gotten so pissed about it that you would want to bomb a country and have a country mass protest.

And finally, it wasnt suppose to be taken seriously, the drawer even said that, it was suppose to raise the moral of the danes with all these terrorist threats going on atm, i mean if you went and talked to a couple of danes then you would know that they all fear that they .. that we are the next victums. And as far as i know 9 other countries including france copied that picture ... If it was suppose to be intentionally against all the muslims then why the hell did france publish it?

[BananaBreadMuffin]

It was more than just a harmless joke, it was suggesting that Mohammed (who is forbidden from being drawn at all) was a terrorist.

[seventy-one]

At 2/5/06 04:22 PM, Coolblue305 wrote:
And finally, it wasnt suppose to be taken seriously, the drawer even said that, it was suppose to raise the moral of the danes with all these terrorist threats going on atm, i mean if you went and talked to a couple of danes then you would know that they all fear that they .. that we are the next victums. And as far as i know 9 other countries including france copied that picture ...

I heard he's always wanted someone to illustrate a book about Muhammed (pbuh) but noone would illustrate it, so he made the cartoons. If it were truly some misunderstanding they could have said sorry and stopped all this, instead they wait six months to do so after everything is in motion.

If it was suppose to be intentionally against all the muslims then why the hell did france publish it?

Because they want to make a freedom of speech point, or they want to provoke them more. It was stupid to reprint the cartoons, knowing what problems it had already caused.

[Antareus]

At 2/5/06 04:33 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: It was more than just a harmless joke, it was suggesting that Mohammed (who is forbidden from being drawn at all) was a terrorist.

Maybe where your from, but not in denmark.

Also, try to think of it like this.

All the past bombing by the al quida or however you spell it, have all used religion as an excuse of their acts. The picture shows how one might interpret muhammed as a terrorist since if you listen to these terrorists they all say that they were sent by him, that they did it for the might muhammed..

[dashes-14]

What's more concerning is that muslim children help burning danish flags, with encouragement of their elders...

[N-Antichrist]

people in the middle east are narrow minded

ugh, i am offended, let's make the nearest thing explode >gu-hugh!<
no, that's a stupid idea, i will blow myself up! weeeeeeeeee, i'm going to paradise

***shortly after this post was made, some muslims got offended and blew up Noob-Antichrist's house

[Antareus]

ok heres my last post for 30 mins.

At 2/5/06 04:37 PM, seventy-one wrote:

At 2/5/06 04:22 PM, Coolblue305 wrote:

I heard he's always wanted someone to illustrate a book about Muhammed (pbuh) but noone would illustrate it, so he made the cartoons. If it were truly some misunderstanding they could have said sorry and stopped all this, instead they wait six months to do so after everything is in motion.

-He actually did apoligise, but atm hes under the victum protection program since theres a damn bounty on the guys head. Also the prime minister of denmark refused a meeting with a couple of muslim countries because denmark is freedom of speech and he doesnt have control over what the journalists say or do. But he has now decided to take up the meeting now that people are starting huge protests.

Because they want to make a freedom of speech point, or they want to provoke them more. It was stupid to reprint the cartoons, knowing what problems it had already caused.

Im no sure when the pictures were reprinted wether before or after what had happened, so no comment here.

But did you see the protest signs?
"Behead those against muhammed"
"... deserve to die!"
etc...

They dumbass comments just proves how ironic the picture is, i mean they are thinking death thoughts as we speak.

Anyway i not in favour of neither side. But if they do attack denmark then i will lose all faith in Muslims and buy a fucking plane ticket down there and give them a fucking piece of my mind.

Coolblue, out.

[BananaBreadMuffin]

At 2/5/06 04:42 PM, Noob-Antichrist wrote: people in the middle east are narrow minded

people in newgrounds are narrow minded.

*ugh some people in the middle east are angry at ______ and as a result they ______'d the ______, so that means that all the people in the middle east are that narrow minded as the few extremists that the media focus on*

[Gandalf-the-Grey]

At 2/5/06 04:46 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:

*ugh some people in the middle east are angry at ______ and as a result they ______'d the ______, so that means that all the people in the middle east are that narrow minded as the few extremists that the media focus on*

you dont see many westerns bombing each other now do we ?

btw gotta ask, are you muslim?

[SouthAsian]

Denmark should seriously shut the fuck up.

they are so angry they lose money to arabs who are the customers.They mustnt think very highly of Arabs or the muslims doing business with them thats why they made those gay ass drawings.

If denmark doesnt want to lose customers who own massive oil fields they shouldnt piss those customers off.

Its as simple as that,you insult my beliefs that i hold in high regard i will let you go to poor.

[HAcoreRD]

At 2/5/06 04:33 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: It was more than just a harmless joke, it was suggesting that Mohammed (who is forbidden from being drawn at all) was a terrorist.

Hey look, I drew one too!

[SouthAsian]

At 2/5/06 04:58 PM, HAcoreRD wrote:

At 2/5/06 04:33 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: It was more than just a harmless joke, it was suggesting that Mohammed (who is forbidden from being drawn at all) was a terrorist.

Hey look, I drew one too!

You see Im not too sure they had AK-47's in the 6th century.

[Gandalf-the-Grey]

At 2/5/06 04:53 PM, muteecho wrote: Denmark should seriously shut the fuck up.

they are so angry they lose money to arabs who are the customers.They mustnt think very highly of Arabs or the muslims doing business with them thats why they made those gay ass drawings.

If denmark doesnt want to lose customers who own massive oil fields they shouldnt piss those customers off.

Its as simple as that,you insult my beliefs that i hold in high regard i will let you go to poor.

Journalism

Government

Gov has no power over Journalism .

One guy drew a couple of pictures and the rest of the country has to suffer. Its been said a million times now, Freedom Of Speech! Gov cant denie it but dont think they havent done anything! the prime minister has gone to the countries and talk to them about the drawings. Btw dont tell me that you've never seen a picture or heard a joke about jesus or god, cause thats just bullshit, but you didnt get mad at the person who told the joke right? Im christian and even i laugh at jokes against my religion, i dont mind jokes about how jesus died for our sins, aslong as they stay jokes.
Finally i want to say as a danish citizen that i did not find the pictures funny but nor do i want to denie the authors right to draw them.

[SouthAsian]

but it was the same danish government who didnt apologise.

why do the western world find freedom of speech more sacred then their own Reliigon?

i guess its fine though,while you worked for worldly betterment,I worked for the cause of god .

[Gandalf-the-Grey]

At 2/5/06 05:04 PM, muteecho wrote: but it was the same danish government who didnt apologise.

Why apologise for something they didnt do nor have control over? anyway they've gone to discuse with the countries who are against the pictures.

why do the western world find freedom of speech more sacred then their own Reliigon?

Basic human rights, would you rather live in a world where you are behead for saying wrong things? or in a world where one can express their own opinion without the threat of death over there head? think about it. Religion is someone oneself should practise and believe, why care what other think when its YOU not them whose worshipping him, i mean according to the muslims we will pay for it anyway in the afterlife... isnt that enough?

i guess its fine though,while you worked for worldly betterment,I worked for the cause of god .

Whats the cause of god please tell me? cause im not even sure if i know.
Infact as a confermed christian i believe in god, but maybe not in the same way as you do. Infact, he's more of an idea for me to better myself, who i worship to to give myself aide in need.

[Gandalf-the-Grey]

was kinda rushed*

but it was the same danish government who didnt apologise.

Why apologise for something they didnt do nor have control over? anyway they've gone to discuse with the countries who are against the pictures i assume thats a sort of an apologie.

why do the western world find freedom of speech more sacred then their own Reliigon?

Basic human rights, would you rather live in a world where you are behead for saying wrong things? or in a world where one can express your own opinion without the threat of death over your head? think about it. Religion is something oneself should practise and believe, why care what other think when its YOU not them whose worshipping it.I mean according to the muslims we will pay for it anyway in the afterlife... isnt that enough?

i guess its fine though,while you worked for worldly betterment,I worked for the cause of god .

Whats gods cause? please tell m, cause im not even sure if i know.
Infact as a confermed christian i believe in god, but maybe not in the same way as you do. Infact, he's more of an idea for me to better myself, who i worship to to give myself aide in need.

[Born-Slippy]

At 2/5/06 04:33 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: It was more than just a harmless joke, it was suggesting that Mohammed (who is forbidden from being drawn at all) was a terrorist.

All the other major religions get grief on a daily basis, far more offensive than these cartoons in many cases. Why is it muslims feel they are somehow uniquely free from criticism of any kind ? People are often afraid to voice their opinions against the muslim religion for the exact reasons we saw in those crazy protests. A stupid insignificant cartoon in a paper incites WORLDWIDE rage and violent outbursts.

It seems to me that if anyone disagrees with muslim beliefs they are not allowed to say so regardless of their own faith. If they do they are threatened with violence and can even be marked for death. If a cartoon suggests mohammed is a terrorist and then the reaction of fundamental muslim extremists is to call for the deaths of innocent people in terrorist attacks there is an incrediable irony these maniacs are missing. If there religion is one of peace and understanding, why is there so many fanatics wanting to murder and kill anyone whos not muslim?

They just want to bully us into not saying what we want, last time i checked my country wasnt under a muslim dictatorship, so I'll say whatever i want about their hypocritcal religion.

[Hammi]

At 2/5/06 04:16 PM, seventy-one wrote: I think its quite the opposite, I think it was intended to incite the hatred of muslims all over the world.

But I agree violence is not the answer, protests sure, but when they become violent they're worse.

Yes, indeed, it is really sad that many muslims r reacting the wrong way. Im a muslim n im pissed as well, but i dont attend 2 use violence, cus im smart enough 2 show my anger on other ways. But not only muslims being too hardcore, there reuropean newspapers fucking this shit up mo by republishing the drawings all over, like theyre bullying us. N whole europe is now lookin at all muslims like theyre all dogshits rite now, using violence. Confusing all muslims wit others who use extreme actions 2 respond on the issues. The methods many muslims r now using, is against everything our dear prophet taught us about. *sigh* N everytime i wish 2 comment on these issues, i end up arguing wit assholes, who think of me as a sick extreme bastard witout knowing me. Both sides better put their feets down on the ground!

The whole europe still got their hundreds of years old hatred against muslims, 2 the present day. N now theyre demonstrating it, wit their publishing of the drawings, which later becomes a large scale of republishing. Now we all have 2 be cautious cus of this, even i. Being a muslim in the west aint easy, lifes so hard... it always had. How i kno? Well... ive been through lots of shit myself, n im sure that pretty many, as i, has done the same.

[BananaBreadMuffin]

At 2/5/06 04:49 PM, Gandalf_the_Grey wrote:

At 2/5/06 04:46 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:

*ugh some people in the middle east are angry at ______ and as a result they ______'d the ______, so that means that all the people in the middle east are that narrow minded as the few extremists that the media focus on*

you dont see many westerns bombing each other now do we ?

I see plenty of news about caucasians attacking other caucasians, thank you.

btw gotta ask, are you muslim?

Nope. Atheist.

[Seanmlr]

Its just like when sinead o conner tore up the pic of the pope, all the catholics were pissed for it, but that was in a country that had a lot of catholics, denmark has their own population of muslims but why the fuck would you piss off a people that obviously are already pissed? It stupid, there's no sense in it.

[ArabFreak]

Violence won't solve anything. Guess who doesn't know that: the uneducated population.

Anybody else still think that Islam is a "peaceful" religion?

[Sarcashka]

At 2/5/06 04:49 PM, Gandalf_the_Grey wrote:
you dont see many westerns bombing each other now do we ?

Yes you do, the americans call it 'Friendly fire'

[JusticeofIrony]

HOW DO I "SATIRE" AROUND HERE?

[Morextremist]

"Thanks for taking the heat off us Denmark!"

USA

[JusticeofIrony]

At 2/5/06 05:33 PM, Hammi wrote: stuff

lol arab_freak