The issue is not about weapons of mass destruction. The weapons of mass destruction are a ploy to gain public support. The issue is that Iraq, Iran, et al. are a threat to national security as a result of their support of terrorism. They want to kill us, remember that, if they have the opportunity and a reason(not to hard for them to find one) they will kill americans.
You criticise Bush for his "overeaction" against Iraq, but I think that you ignore the fact that he is barely doing anything. compare the amount of moblization today to that of the mobilization of the cold war or of world war 2. There is sufficient threat to warrant full scale mobilization, and it would likely cost many lives. You should all be counting your lucky stars that Bush isn't going all out, he's doing it diplomatically and getting UN support.
The problem with all you anti war people is that you don't understand the full spectrum of war. You see it as A: Peace, B: War. Reality is that there's a whole spectrum of states from
C:Special Ops teams
D: Undeclared War
F: Full scale War
G: Nuclear strikes
H: Uncondiitonal commmittment to destruction.
We are somewhere between C and D, moving our way up to a spot between D and E. I think that the attacks on our country warrant at least E, perhaps a little F. I think it's time to grow up, and face reality, when someone attacks us, we cannot allow them to exist.