You've proved that a child with a dictionary doesn't make a good argument.
Your entire argument is based on the fact that you are incapable of accepting the truth and that repeating yourself over and over again doesn't make a stronger argument.
You've also proved that you can't accept defeat at all.
You mean exactly what you have done? Repeated your same incorrect and irrelevant defenses, nor ever see that you are wrong? Clearly we both believe the other is incorrect so reiterating that will accomplish nothing, which I’ve said before, and this is at least the second time you have so acted.
I'm at the point where the only thing left to do is to prove you gross inadequacies by mockimg you.
And a good job of that I am doing.
I don’t care if you try “mockimg” me, I am not concerned by the opinions of those I do not respect, and your mockery is misguided and futile anyway.
Point out where I said they were gay.
Notice you can't find it?
What’s ironic is you accuse me of repeating yet you just repeated a sentence almost word for word. Go back a few posts and find where I had you saying this, underlined for your convenience, and read what I wrote.
Notice you can't find it?
You'd obviously make a horrible lawyer.
Go ahead and choke your ego down with a can of Shrapnel whoops ass.
Too bad that your opinion doesn’t matter to be, nor did I ever indicated anything about lawyers. You ask about conceit, here is a prime example of it.
You've used 'gay' in a derogatory manner insulting the clocks. You can't play any moral high ground card ever.
I never did, and you would do well to read where I responded to this very same argument. You aren’t even creating new irrelevant and incorrect defenses.
You've lost this argument before you started.
I see by the great amount of supporting details here that I have no choice to accept this. Wait; there are no supporting details. Nothing except you being stubborn and incorrect.
And here's one last example of your poor argument for the public to see:
"Shrapnel wrote: You are still wrong. What is your point? Is it wrong for them to love each other? In what way am I wrong? I do feel better in myself in the fact that your discussion says nothing.
Newgrundling wrote: You apparently do not attempt to hide any conceit. Again I made this painfully clear that I agreed that you did not call them “gay”."
Where is the conceit?
Conceit - (noun) An overweening idea of one's self; vanity.
Vanity - (noun) Excessive pride in one's appearance or accomplishments
Out rightly, and still without having actually successfully contesting any of my points, you say that I am wrong (which is equivalent to you saying that you are right). I will assume you merely did not understand the words completely, otherwise you wouldn't even ask such a foolish question.
“You are wrong” – you
In an argument both parties typically believe the other to be wrong, and both of us have voiced that, you much more than I, and I have tried to stress its futility. Are you claiming that you never made any such accusation?
Hiding conceit where?
I said you weren’t hiding conceit, read better.
You have your dictionary.
Where is the conceit?
I need a big lengthy explanation from you again to see how conceit is derived from that statement.
I’ll tried to make it as obvious as possible so that you could understand.
You are a textbook definition of filibuster.
More like determination against ignorance
You make the word 'loquacious' embarrased.
I say what needs to be said.
Why does anyone need to respond to each of your posts when there are no point in the posts?
Nobody needs to respond to my posts, but I would assume that if you have any notion that you are indeed correct that you would and could easily prove me wrong, yet you fail to do so, and only ramble, usually irrelevantly and incorrectly.
You have no point at all.
None.
You have made it abundantly clear that you cannot see my point, however I cannot be blamed for your alleged incompetence.
