Be a Supporter!

Revolutions revolution in graphics.

  • 792 Views
  • 37 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
Flashbottle
Flashbottle
  • Member since: Jan. 13, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 14
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:14:22 Reply

wow who cares seriouly nintendo is trying to be more revolutionary but they suck at it who wants to play a damn game with a fucking tv remore and the grpahics in my opinion dont look any better then I've seen form the 360 and ps3 we know nintendo sucks and ps3 and xbox 360 will kick its ass forever.

kusosuke
kusosuke
  • Member since: Dec. 15, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:16:22 Reply

Nintendo's going to need to do really well with the Revolution if they want to keep their position as a successful video game business. I hope it doesnt suck, but the idea of using a TV remote for anything other than first person shooters doesnt sound that appealing to me.

MRED
MRED
  • Member since: Dec. 7, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:25:36 Reply

At 12/14/05 10:14 PM, Flashbottle wrote: IM AM SOOOO SMARtZ HAHHRHRHAHRHRAHRH

ahhh stfu you 2-bit fruitcup

Comeback when you know what your talking about

Dipshit

and learn how to spell while your at it

NINTENDO>YOU

edn

AeroZeppelin
AeroZeppelin
  • Member since: Jun. 4, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:32:53 Reply

At 12/14/05 10:14 PM, Flashbottle wrote: wow who cares seriouly nintendo is trying to be more revolutionary but they suck at it who wants to play a damn game with a fucking tv remore and the grpahics in my opinion dont look any better then I've seen form the 360 and ps3 we know nintendo sucks and ps3 and xbox 360 will kick its ass forever.

Funniest post I've seen all day.

monkyboy29
monkyboy29
  • Member since: Sep. 20, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:34:10 Reply

At 12/14/05 09:05 PM, Erathun wrote: http://209.132.69.82..isplacementphone.jpg



Its a new patent by nintnedo called displacement maps. Its like they can make just as good graphics as ps3 or 360 using less pixals. I dunno much about it but it seems interesting. I actually think revolution might be the system this time around.

this is why nintendo will win the gameing wars this time around. more content, great graphics, unbeatable price. nobody will belive it till it happens....

Trunks
Trunks
  • Member since: Jul. 31, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 22
Musician
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 22:50:40 Reply

At 12/14/05 09:15 PM, Erathun wrote:
At 12/14/05 09:08 PM, Tancrisism wrote: The PS3 has just as good, if not better graphics. Who cares about pixels? It'll still run fine.
yes i know that. But with this technology they can sell their consoles at a more affordable price. PS3 will cost around 350$ while Revolution will cost around 150$ and have the same graphics.

I heard its supposed to have the "ultimate playback ability"...... raising the value about 300%... *whips out Snes and N64 controller* Im ready if its true!


Web developer, software engineer, musician, all-around nerd.

Erathun
Erathun
  • Member since: Apr. 24, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 05
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-14 23:17:29 Reply

At 12/14/05 10:50 PM, LordTrunks wrote:
At 12/14/05 09:15 PM, Erathun wrote:
At 12/14/05 09:08 PM, Tancrisism wrote:

I heard its supposed to have the "ultimate playback ability"...... raising the value about 300%... *whips out Snes and N64 controller* Im ready if its true!

I also heard that

Guitardude
Guitardude
  • Member since: Oct. 14, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 14
Blank Slate
Response to Revolutions revolution in graphics. 2005-12-15 00:20:48 Reply

At 12/14/05 10:25 PM, --MRED-- wrote: ahhh stfu you 2-bit fruitcup

Comeback when you know what your talking about

Dipshit
and learn how to spell while your at it

NINTENDO>YOU

edn

see, this is what leads people to belive you're a fanboy.

At 12/14/05 10:14 PM, Flashbottle wrote: wow who cares seriouly nintendo is trying to be more revolutionary but they suck at it who wants to play a damn game with a fucking tv remore and the grpahics in my opinion dont look any better then I've seen form the 360 and ps3 we know nintendo sucks and ps3 and xbox 360 will kick its ass forever.

I understand your disbelief but if you just take the time to see past graphics and mainstream popularity, you'll see nintendo's plan isn't half bad. As a ps3 and x-box 360 fan you should know that if it werent for Nintendo, so much of those systems wouldn't exist. Hell, the systems themselves probably wouldn't exist.

If reading this, you still think i'm just a Nintendo Fan blabing on and on then consider things like the contol stick. Things like the Rumble pack, the ability to play four players, Wireless controllers (which funny enough we're seeing alot of in these next gen systems.) and alot more.

I'm sure people back then thought the Control stick was a wacky idea and that they should have just stuck with the traditional Control pad (which they also invented by the way) but Now it's the standard in all game systems. Now think about being able to control games no longer with control sticks or joy sticks, but with the movment of the control itself. As wierd as it sounds now (and I know it does to alot of people) It might just become the standard for video game systems for the future. just you wait.

Do you really belive that X-box and Playstation will kick ass forever if all they do is just keep making systems more powerful and with better graphics? Give Nintendo credit, at least they're trying something new.


[Wii Together] [Teh Space]

Alb [4210-3652-1542] <<-Brawl Code. PM me

BBS Signature