Iran

[BrooklynBrett]

By the way, in case you don't follow the news, Iran is coming very, very close to producing nuclear weapons.

Furthermore, in case you don't know, Iran's president has openly held conferences on how the USA and Israel must be destroyed.

Put 2 and 2 together, and what do you get? That's right, a serious problem.

This is just your friendly neighborhood Thorfalcon warning you that what we're doing in Iraq is pretty damned important. If freedom and democracy aren't allowed to take hold in the middle east, and radical, militant Islam has its way, they'd like nothing better than a nuke in your back yard.

http://www.foxnews.c..,2933,178330,00.html

[tlyer-durden]

At 12/11/05 06:04 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: a bunch of shit

dude this would fit in better in the poltics section of the bords

[BrooklynBrett]

At 12/11/05 06:05 AM, tlyer_durden wrote:

At 12/11/05 06:04 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: a bunch of shit

dude this would fit in better in the poltics section of the bords

Considering that you can't spell "politics" OR "boards", I'm going to tell you to shut up before simply ignoring you.

[I-Jaf]

Iran -is- technicly a democracy, and that's who they voted for.

Democracy clearly doesn't work, stop trying to spread it.

[Knudsen]

At 12/11/05 06:04 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: By the way, in case you don't follow the news, Iran is coming very, very close to producing nuclear weapons.

Is this coming from the same source that said that Iraq had nuclear weapons of mass destruction? Cause I mean, you should've learned your lesson of playing the international hero when you failed so miserably with Iraq...

[BrooklynBrett]

Democracy clearly doesn't work, stop trying to spread it.

Heheh, yeah... communism, right? Pffft

[ManHe]

At 12/11/05 06:05 AM, tlyer_durden wrote: dude this would fit in better in the poltics section of the bords

You're forgetting that he's shunned there for being a completely unreasonable, arrogant cuntscab.

[BrooklynBrett]

Is this coming from the same source that said that Iraq had nuclear weapons of mass destruction? Cause I mean, you should've learned your lesson of playing the international hero when you failed so miserably with Iraq...

By the way, Knudsen, your European jealousy is kinda hot. ;)

Only you silly European's could see 26 million people freed, and call it a miserable failure. At least you gave us Peter Forsberg. Otherwise, your phallic-shaped country would just be plain useless, wouldn't it?

[DeckMaster171]

At 12/11/05 06:05 AM, tlyer_durden wrote:

At 12/11/05 06:04 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: a bunch of shit

dude this would fit in better in the poltics section of the bords

we all love polotics leave the man alone

[I-Jaf]

At 12/11/05 06:10 AM, Thorfalcon wrote:

Democracy clearly doesn't work, stop trying to spread it.

Heheh, yeah... communism, right? Pffft

No, that doesn't work either.

[ManHe]

At 12/11/05 06:17 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: Only you silly European's could see 26 million people freed, and call it a miserable failure.

They don't seem to be too happy with their "freedom".

[Knudsen]

At 12/11/05 06:17 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: Only you silly European's could see 26 million people freed and shit

Maybe you don't realise that "free" doesn't necessarily mean better off? So what that they can vote now if they're far worse off then they were before? All I'm saying is that it could've been handled in a better way, and that the US has such a large ego that you don't get that you had no buisness whatsoever playing the hero and "rescuing" the Iraqi population when they're clearly suffering way more now than before...

And besides, my former reply had nothing to do with the question of Iraqi freedom, I merely commented on the fact that you STILL haven't found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq even though you "knew" they had them..

Lastly, why on earth would Europeans be jealous of the US? That's just bs - we laugh at you, that's what we do.

[I-Jaf]

You can't argue on the internet, you have to be able to shout at idiots to make them see they're wrong. You can't do that here, which is very annoying considering the overwhelming number of idiots.

[LinkSilvermane]

This isn't new...

Pretty much every country on the face of the Earth that isn't a third world country has access to nuclear weapons.

[tlyer-durden]

Considering that you can't spell "politics" OR "boards", I'm going to tell you to shut up before simply ignoring you.

ohhhh alright i tryed to be nice now you just pissed me off friend alright lissin up no one cares bout your views on iraq or whatever the fuck you want to think about keep it to yourself noone cares in the poltices bored they might care but we dont so fuck off you little asshole

[BrooklynBrett]

Maybe you don't realise that "free" doesn't necessarily mean better off? So what that they can vote now if they're far worse off then they were before? All I'm saying is that it could've been handled in a better way, and that the US has such a large ego that you don't get that you had no buisness whatsoever playing the hero and "rescuing" the Iraqi population when they're clearly suffering way more now than before...

Free isn't better, huh? Maybe that's why you guys live in a socialistic state of cradle-to-grave government ownership of your lives. Americans hold to personal dignity a little more tightly, thank you very much.

Iraqis are "clearly suffering" huh? Yikes, that's odd... If you think that the "torture" at Abu Ghraib was bad, Saddam says otherwise. He inflicted the most brutal, degrading tortures imaginable, read up and wise up: http://www.gwu.edu/~..iv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB167/

So we have an "ego" problem, huh? I'll gladly be called arrogant before I'm enslaved like the Iraqis were, or institutionalized like you Swedes are.

Americans are proud of their freedom, and damned proud of taking part in the end of Nazism (that enslaved YOUR country), fascism, and Soviet imperialism. Arrogant? Fuck yeah.

Oh boy. WMD's, huh? Guess what?
Saddam DID have them. He USED them against Iran in the early 80's and against the Kurds as well. Furthermore, we know he had them even more recently, because US troops have FOUND plenty of them. One Iraqi scientist even had a nuclear centrifuge buried in his back yard. And you suggest that he wasn't a threat.

Again, read up and wisen up:
http://www.foxnews.c..,2933,120137,00.html

http://www.washingto..AR2005081300530.html

http://www.freerepub..f-news/1520691/posts

http://www.renewamer..columns/hagin/040427

http://www.clublexus..ex.php/t-119853.html

This last one is my favorite... Even American liberals are admitting that he had them.
http://www.democrati..demvoices-03wmd.html

My cute little institutionalized Swedish girl, I'm sorry your country has fallen into state-sponsored cradle-to-the-gravism, but its not your fault.

You're wrong...... free is ALWAYS better.

[BananaBreadMuffin]

At 12/11/05 06:41 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: You're wrong...... free is ALWAYS better.

What about those free samples of artificial sweeteners I always get? They suck.

[ManHe]

At 12/11/05 06:41 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: This last one is my favorite... Even American liberals are admitting that he had them.
http://www.democrati..demvoices-03wmd.html

I love how you fail to mention the fact that they were sold to Saddam by the USA.

[KidneyThief]

yes this would definetly go in teh polotics board, but think of it this way, you or a family member gets sent to iraq, well you or your family member dies, if you die sucks to be you, plus your family gets hurt as well. if your family member dies then same thing, except it wouls suck to be them, see things from other peoples points of view, i get wat ur saying but i dont really agree we should be in iraq. also we were tricked into this war, our president is a moron, Iraq had nothing to do wit the world trade center bombings, bush used that as an excuse. why? oil, i think

[JohnnyWang]

Can I say "Reap what you sow". You Funded the Islamists in favor of communists in the Shah-matter.

[BrooklynBrett]

At 12/11/05 06:51 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: Can I say "Reap what you sow". You Funded the Islamists in favor of communists in the Shah-matter.

Hacking through your grammar like a Brit through dark Africa, I think I see what you're saying. (you Pink Floyd fans are tough to read... too much pot!)

You're suggesting that because we helped someone stay free, and fight off communist imperialism, that we're getting what we deserve because they've turned on our help?

Yeah, that's rough.

We aid them to stay free of communist oppression, then religious whackos take over, we free them again, and we had it coming?

L-a-w-l.

At 12/11/05 06:05 AM, tlyer_durden wrote:

At 12/11/05 06:04 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: a bunch of shit

dude this would fit in better in the poltics section of the bords

he has a point. why dont you listen to what he says

[JohnnyWang]

At 12/11/05 06:54 AM, Thorfalcon wrote: Hacking through your grammar like a Brit through dark Africa, I think I see what you're saying. (you Pink Floyd fans are tough to read... too much pot!)

Ooh, how witty.

You're suggesting that because we helped someone stay free, and fight off communist imperialism, that we're getting what we deserve because they've turned on our help?

So freedom is what they have now?

We aid them to stay free of communist oppression, then religious whackos take over, we free them again, and we had it coming?

How are you sure it would have been opression? I have no proof it had been any retter, but you did fund the fundamentalists that got to power. And you lkept the corrupt Shah in power way too long.

Your argumentation only consists of insulting the oponent, saying communism sucks and trhowing random links, which may or may not have anything to do with the issue, becaus emost won't bother to check them. Congradulations, you truly are the debate king of NG.

[Knudsen]

At 12/11/05 07:02 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: Your argumentation only consists of insulting the oponent, saying communism sucks and trhowing random links, which may or may not have anything to do with the issue, becaus emost won't bother to check them. Congradulations, you truly are the debate king of NG.

God yes, I agree with you fully!

Btw ThorFalcon, care to explain your hate of Sweden for me? Cause you spew out words like cradle-to-gravism without really seeming to know what's so wrong with it...

[Homophobe]

I don't know why any of you even bother responding to this guy.

His basic arguement technique consists of slamming his head fruitlessly against his keyboard, in the hopes that it may just spit out something semi-intelligable.

It never does.

[ManHe]

At 12/11/05 07:02 AM, JohnnyWang wrote: Congradulations, you truly are the debate king of NG.

Too bad he'll ignore it like he does everything else opposing his own view of things. He wouldn't know the truth if it sodomised him with a pineapple.

[Modjo]

Iran is fucking awesome. Hell, they even hang the homosexuals over there. Not that I have anything against homosexuals but that's just awesome.

[JohnnyWang]

At 12/11/05 07:10 AM, ManHe wrote:
Too bad he'll ignore it like he does everything else opposing his own view of things. He wouldn't know the truth if it sodomised him with a pineapple.

Yeah, well NG is mostly quite liberal, so he, as one of the few conservatives, has to be aggressive to stand out.

But it doesn't change the fact, that most of what he says is bullshit, oppinnions or proven false.

[BrooklynBrett]

Btw ThorFalcon, care to explain your hate of Sweden for me? Cause you spew out words like cradle-to-gravism without really seeming to know what's so wrong with it...

I don't hate Sweden, silly girl.

I pity you.

Believe it or not, there exist in the world people who don't want to have their lives dictated to them by an "all wise" government. We want to be taxed very lightly, and dictate our own destinies. The government sponsoring your whole life is an idea attractive to some Americans (aka Michael Moore), but the rest of us hold fiercely to our independance and basic human dignity.

[synchronixxxer]

and all of this coming from a security guard. enough said.