Nukclear war is inevitable.

[MonkeyMan-Inc]

We are all in deep shit. Bush, the fucking moron is threatening to use nukes on Iraq and terrorist networks. This is a quote from a newspaper. The papers headline was"We Will Nuke You". So if Bush does nuke anyone.North Korea or anyone else that has a grudge will trough nukes at us. So we are in deep shit. Say hello to a nukclear Winter.

[Drimarki]

Hopefully Bush does not use nuclear weapons. However, if he do, then someone really need to assassinate him.

North Korea is not realy a problem, as thier missile, Skud D "No Dong", has radius of only 560 miles or something like that. If North Korea does fire its nuclear missile, then its target would probably be one of United State's allies, South Korea or Japan. However, what really becomes a problem is not North Korea, but other countries who have nuclear weapons and have ICBMs (Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles). Those countries might be angry with Bush firing nuclear weapons and may try to attack United States. Then we have a problem.

[Arekanderu]

I don't realy care about the united states but i hope that euorope will not be hit because of this asshole Bush.And misiles are not the only problem after the cold war more then 50 nuclear suitcase bombs got lost and they are so small that is almost imposible to find or stop them.And they do not need acess codes so even a kid can blow them up

[EmeraldNiteMare]

True...any nuclear action would affect the entire world. Everyone in the world right now have radioactive atoms from the nuclear accident in Russia. Once a nuclear explosion goes off, the world is affected. If Bush starts nuking, the whole world should think about throwing a couple in his direction, because no matter how careful Bush can be, anything nuclear explosion will affect the world.

[Arekanderu]

At 12/14/02 06:34 AM, EmeraldNiteMare wrote: True...any nuclear action would affect the entire world. Everyone in the world right now have radioactive atoms from the nuclear accident in Russia.

The accident was not in russia and the main problem is the radioactive polution and getinic defects

[The-Raven]

The "Apoclypse" as we know it may be inevitable, but this is how it will go down. #1.American soldiers invade X country #2.American soldiers brutially beaten back #3.X invaded country retaliates with whatever means nessessary (first strike of cascade ending) #4.Bush orders retaliatory strike for the enemy retaliation. #5.Bounces back and forth between X country and America until NOTHING is left.

cascade obliteration, sound interesting? Heres why !
V
But what we must think about is Catalyst #1:George Bush. He alone is the key to the apoclypse in its entirney. Being the agressor in a silent "domination" of all rouge nations that have great hatrid for his country to start with (started with the plain and simple fact of how the united states has been a capitalistic-economic pig and wanting to secure the middle east). To stop the inevitable oblitteration of the united states by these rogue nations, Bush takes the offencive: the catalyst itself, The united states itself.

[Drimarki]

Well said. That might be the key to what Bush is up to. Thinking about what you have said, it is possible that Bush is using nukes to stop the destruction of United States.

However, it would be better if the explanation of 'cascade obliteration' came out. Right now, I'm wondering that when peace is achieved then whole idea of cascade obliteration would be obsolete. Or am I naive to believe that peace could ever be achieved?

[DutchClock]

Stopping Saddam is neccesary, but without enormous killings by nuclear attacks, I mean the world has enough problems already... The greenhouse effect, Africa is dry as a cork, enormous floodings in Europe! Why doesn't Bush just (it may sound stupid) send a topsecret assault team to Iraq to take out or permanetaly capture Saddam? I know it's hard, but it's worth the lives that are gonna be saved that way! The hard way is the way that pays off most for all the hard work!

[Ethiopian-Fat-Camp]

We need Norm back in command, do as he suggested in the Gulf War and do what that guy just said, take him out with Spec. Ops. I know that sounds really ignorant cus im not using a buncha points to back that up, but its kinda black and white in this case, it should be done.

[Len-Mystic]

Nuclear war has seemed innevitable many time i mean look how many people acted like they had a thirty foot pole up their ass during the cold war. The main point is that not even bush is stupid enough to start a nuclear war.

[HarryFeltersnach]

i think bush is talkin out of his ass. Dont get me wrong the mans a moron. But i dont kno if hes stupid enough to use nukes............or at least i hope.

[Spazzoid]

If Bush thinks using nukes on country for a madman for a leader...we are in some DEEP sh!t. Not only would Hussain launch a supreme retaliation, he would without a doubt launch his biological and chemical warheads at us. We should just get some poor,dumb bum on a street to wire himself up with bombs, and have march into Saddams office. We don't need some huge, fancy army to march in and get plastered all over the desert. They should just try to make it as the U.S had absolutely nothing to do with his death.

[cylon]

I have a silly hope.

A silly, improbable hope.

The hope is that if Bush ever sends the word to use one of those weapons, that the people below him refuse to comply.

[Wildbob]

Bush is a fucking retard. If Iraq and Hussein even has nuclear weapons, they will most certainly not use them. Nukes are only symbols of power now in days. Basically, Hussein is just trying to give out the message, "Don't fuck with us," to the other countries. That is, if he does have nukes. Half a century ago, Kennedy was smart enough to not declare war against Russia, even though he knew that they had nuclear weapons. This is because he knew that they would never use them. That the nukes were just symbols of authority. Obviously, Bush is too retarded to notice this. Also, this war would be unconstitutional. International law clearly states that Country A cannot declare war on Country B unless Country B has already attacked Country A. Iraq has not attacked America, and is definitely not intending to. Saddam loves to cling to his power, and attacking the most powerful country on Earth would ruin his country and strip him of his power. Maybe it's the political punk talking, but it seems to me that the only reason Bush is gunning for war is because Hussein tried to kill his daddy.

[EmeraldNiteMare]

Your claim that nations "certainly won't use nuclear weapons" may not be totally true. If Iraq gets attacked, I'm quite sure Saddam is not going to sit around and watch his country get blown to bits.

And Spazzoid is correct, you don't need a nuclear war to stop Iraq. Using war to make peace is just folly. That's where Bush has got off on the wrong path.

[Drimarki]

At 12/22/02 06:15 AM, EmeraldNiteMare wrote: Your claim that nations "certainly won't use nuclear weapons" may not be totally true. If Iraq gets attacked, I'm quite sure Saddam is not going to sit around and watch his country get blown to bits.

Does Iraq even have weapons of mass destructions? Even that we are not sure of. He might not even have it. There are still some weapon inspections going on, and so far they found nothing significant to prove that Iraq has them. So if Iraq doesn't have nukes, then what can he do? He have airplanes, tanks, and artilleries, but that is worthless against United States. Remember the Operation Desert Storm? United States just rampaged through Iraqian army. Iraq knows what will happen if they send armies to resist United States.
If Iraq doesn't have any nukes, then whether it will use its army or not, the nuclear war is avoided...for now.

[EmeraldNiteMare]

True...it's hard to tell if Iraq has nukes. He could have them secreted away in his own back yard or something. Saddam can't do much if he doesn't have any, other than crawl into that hole of his...

[karlman99100]

supreme retaliation? let em' we have the right to bear arms. hell we could blow this earth up twice! WEE HAH!

What if we let saddam kill his people? maybe we could (get this) apoligize to all the people we pissed off, pull our troops out of their land and let them meddle in their own affairs. We could still spy on them. We have that missle defense system, the FBI, the CIA, we have bunkers, troops, spys, radars, food, and money, we have our own guns, and best of all were thoasands of miles away. Before we nuke em' (if we do) lets fix up america.