At 7/8/06 04:16 PM, Littlewashu wrote:
At 7/8/06 04:14 PM, Ghost_Phantom wrote:
At 7/8/06 04:09 PM, Littlewashu wrote:
I have to ask what was with those long winded speeches I saw on the last page? they made no sense what so ever to me. But oter then that B/P is slow of me oh well back to work of me.
Well, those spammers got hit in the head with a shovel for hours, and then came up with the idea to use a program, called the complaint generator to make long, fake complaints which only prooves how annoying these bastards are.
I will say that only proves that they don't have lives of there own since they want to spam up our club house!
I don't even understand why they even do it, what have we done to them that's that bad? :\
I am angry. Angry that events have transpired that lead me to write this statement. There are a number of reasons the Spammers aren't telling us as to why they want to turn our club into an unstable cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and "crime". In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that by writing this letter, I am undeniably sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that the Spammers will retaliate against me. They'll most likely try to force me to become clinically depressed, although another possibility is that when his contemptible utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, The Spammers appear to be saying that the media should "create" news rather than report it. For me, this uncivilized moonshine serves only to emphasize how some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that each liberated mind that examines all of the evidence is a break in the chains that bind us all. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. Life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why are the Spammers so compelled to complain about situations over which they have no control over? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that most people still loath to admit that the Spammers's stances are attributable to an ignorance born of fear. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, The Spammers have a strategy. Their strategy is to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with The Spammers.
Currently, The Spammers's doctrines merely create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. As you will see in the blink of an eye, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg. There is no doubt that The Spammers will cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills before long. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that I am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to turn random, senseless spamming into meaningful action. I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Postmodernist ogres like him, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in blinkered unambitious-types in order to convince them to reward those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with his crusades while punishing those who oppose them.
Some people consider The Spammers's long-term goals a necessary evil, but the truth is that the key to The Spammers's souls are longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. They dread the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, The Spammers have, for a long time been arguing that we are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. Had they instead been arguing that their legates internalize and adapt to the unwritten realities they must work under, I might cede them their point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in The Spammers's arguments are simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how their true goal is to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. All the statements that their expositors make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to help people break free of the Spammers's cycle of oppression. You see, The Spammers tries to humiliate their opponents(i.e. us) rather than win their understanding. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that the Spammers talk a lot about communism and how wonderful it is. However, they've never actually defined what it means. How can they argue for something they've never defined? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because The Spammers lack the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of their life, I will restate what I said before, for their sake: Their notions are but a speck in a constellation of methodologies used by Bonapartism to promote antisocial ideologies such as vandalism. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. I, for one, can't possibly believe the Spammers's claim that it is their moral imperative to destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because you shouldn't let the Spammers intimidate you. You shouldn't let them push you around. We're the ones who are right, not The Spammers. My eventual goal for this letter is to examine the social and cultural conditions that tap into the national resurgence of overt priggism. I'm counting on all of you for your support.
Until I get that, however, simply ignore them.