The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.34 / 5.00 31,296 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.07 / 5.00 10,082 ViewsOf course if you get blood from a gay person it will turn you gay, just like getting blood from black people will make you black or getting blood from midgets will turn you into a midget. (sarcasm)
If you don't test positive for HIV they don't have any right to deny you the right to donate blood.
At 11/17/05 08:29 PM, smith916 wrote: The only good reason for this that i can think of is that scientists dont know how people become homosexual. They might feel that since gay people are less tolerated by society they dont want to phyically inflict homosexuality on somone. Since, homosexuality can either be:
Bug inflicted - Caused by a virus or a disease changing sertain qualities of a person.
A disease... now that is friggin hilarious. If this were the case, victims of male on male rapes would then become gay after their attack! Further, there would be a rise in the number of gay people, since a disease that is unchecked will spread into an epidemic. OH MY GOD A GAY EPIDEMIC! AHHHHH. C'mon you're not serious are you?
Use your brain before your mouth.
And there hasn't been a definable "gay" gene either.... so it must be choice.
By the way, statistically, there has been a steady percentage of humans that are "gay" throughout history.
If you don't test positive for HIV they don't have any right to deny you the right to donate blood.
If you had sex withina month prior they will ask you to come back later or retake the test. Look for my earlier post in this thread.
I'll be honest fli, when you've had the blood of heterosexual people, you just can't go back to homosexual blood, the taste, it's just not up to par.
Now personally, it doesn't get any better than virgin blood, there's a reason why it's the blood of choice for Satanists, the world over. Now, I'm not big on the whole Satanist thing, but when they're right, they're right.
Oh yeah, it sucks about the whole blood donation thing, but like you said, no big deal for you. Personally, I hate needles.
Think you're pretty clever...
Whenever I go to donate, they always ask if I'm HIV positive. NEVER if I'm sexually active or anything along those natures, weird huh?
After that, they have two little sticker things that I have to put on a box, they look identical, but one reads HIV negative on their machines, the other reads HIV positive. The person with me informs me by law she is not allowed to watch me place one of the stickers on my sheet, and turns around. She turns back, and starts the draining process....
Agree with the rest, stupid outdated policy that is irrelevant in the wake of technological advanced in blood screening. Sypathize whole-heartedly.
As far as cause of homosexuality?
Dunno, read tons of studies, all inconclusive.
BTW, what term do y'all prefer nowadays? Don't wanna be rude and call yas somethin ya don't wanna be called (feel free to call me stupid white boy or crakah or whatever, lol)....
What term you like the best?
The least?
Writing Forum Reviewer.
PM me for preferential Writing Forum review treatment.
See my NG page for a regularly updated list of works I will review.
fli has bad AIDS. What if a mad man broke in there with a machine gun and shot you to pieces? Anyone there yawning would get your blood in their mouths. You shouldn’t have come into the blood drive.
At 11/17/05 07:01 PM, pastry_productions wrote: You made the child outside my house cry!
Go beat his ass in and tell him to shut the hell up.
At 11/18/05 11:57 AM, cool_penguin_0 wrote: fli has bad AIDS. What if a mad man broke in there with a machine gun and shot you to pieces? Anyone there yawning would get your blood in their mouths. You shouldn’t have come into the blood drive.
What? How do you know that he has aids? He just stated that he was clean. They could make him take a test before donating blood to see if he has aids, that seems like the most logical solution I think. I mean, the red cross needs blood, so why not take all that they can get? They just need to make sure that it's clean first.
Hhahaha, how the fuck would being gay be genetic or the extra gene x thing? Actually I guess the gene x thing would influence you but overall I think its a choice. I'm not gay so I cant really say, what do you think guy who posted this? Oh that sucks that they wont take your blood. Maby you can get an HIV test and have that little card that says your clean or watever. Hopefully theyll just change that policy though.
At 11/17/05 08:35 PM, seyton1 wrote:At 11/17/05 08:29 PM, smith916 wrote: The only good reason for this that i can think of is that scientists dont know how people become homosexual. They might feel that since gay people are less tolerated by society they dont want to phyically inflict homosexuality on somone. Since, homosexuality can either be:Please tell me your joking
Hereditary - From gene's,
Patarnized hereditary - Comes every X generations
Bug inflicted - Caused by a virus or a disease changing sertain qualities of a person.
Choice - It was simply the persons choice, but this is highly unlikly because many homosexual characterisitcs can be noticed at an early age.
I highly doubt it is a disease. I am no going to guess at what it is caused from but I know being gay is not a disease.
Sorry... i used the term disease, but i ment simply that it's a cell that enters the body and changes hereditary information regaurding sexual attractions. I highly doubt this is possible since then sexuality seems to arise at a particular age. Actually disease would really be a bad name for it since it's not received. I apologize.
At 11/18/05 11:57 AM, cool_penguin_0 wrote: fli has bad AIDS.
I don't have AIDS-- I've even tested recently (which is how I test my husband fidelity... my own little secret.)
What if a mad man broke in there with a machine gun and shot you to pieces? Anyone there yawning would get your blood in their mouths. You shouldn’t have come into the blood drive.
Say wut?
At 11/18/05 05:19 PM, KohnELITE wrote: Hhahaha, how the fuck would being gay be genetic or the extra gene x thing? Actually I guess the gene x thing would influence you but overall I think its a choice. I'm not gay so I cant really say, what do you think guy who posted this? Oh that sucks that they wont take your blood. Maby you can get an HIV test and have that little card that says your clean or watever. Hopefully theyll just change that policy though.
how would gay be genetic? Well, I'm not sure about you... but I get NO sexual stimulation from guys. The way it can be a choice is if many people get sexual stimulation from both boys or girls.
And, of course, what we are sexually attracted to is initially determined by genes... why aren't we naturally sexually attracted to chickens? Thank our genes for that. But you can get sexually aroused by chickens, but that takes a hell a lot of sexual conditioning.
So, my point being, being sexually attracted to males or females is determined by genes. But you can still force yourself to live life as a heterosexual man, so as a lifestyle it is a choice, but one that is very clear cut for you.