At 11/7/05 10:29 PM, NegativeONE wrote:
Oh, now you guys know I'm not here on the weekend.
and you haven't bothered linking me to it.
Then don't you think you could have saved face by keeping quiet for the first time in a thread like this? :-/
I was/am trying to help the people that read the thread make the right choice, I'd like to note again I haven't linked to armor games in this thread, and I honestly only did so for the good of the common flasher, do you really think that anyone here does not know about armor games? seriously, do you think people need a reminder? you can rest assured self promotion wasn't my goal when I posted here.
Seriously, don't take things out of context. I was just criticising him for doing so.
I'm not sure what brand new context you think I brought this into. You took huge flak for doing this in Riftmaster's thread, and yet you're here, doing it again. C'mon.
I'm not afraid of criticism or from getting bad PR for armor games. My post on rift's wasn't really well-put but both me and rift knew what it was supposed to mean, it was jose that started the fuss over it and I apologized for phrasing it like that. My posts here might have seemed "low" or "sleezy" to you, but as much as your respect means to me, if one author got sponsored by let's say cmg for three hundrad instead of here for 50 and was able to get a new tablet and hang out for a while with the extra money, I'm satisfied. your respect does mean a lot, don't get it wrong, but it's not even on the scale of this greater good, and I believe that a 50$ sponsorship isn't fair and nor was the site clean of theft when the thread originated.
How the Hell can you think that you're not pushing your own agenda everywhere you go when your sig has multiple flashy links to AG following a post about how there are "better alternatives"?
For one I won't change my sig just to be able to post on this thread. For another people rarely check others' sigs to see if they are in context. I could have just posted "good luck" and you would have said the same thing but point is I am entitled to have an opinion regardless of what my sig is "whoring". what do you suggest, removing it from my sig when I post? NG doesn't let you not post your sig unlike other forum systems, given the option I would have done it.
I missed the part where he said "I'm only accepting excellent projects that you worked for months on!" You guys make the mistake of thinking that he's trying to steal Gel's or Monkokio's business or something. He just wants some modest but decent game makers.
You're making a mistake thinking my goal on this thread was to defend AG's developers from renegading (if that's a word).
Thanks for that. I really know nothing of hard work. But someday I aspire to clone another easy-to-program Newgrounds cliche <3
<3
I know that you work hard on your things, this is why I'm shocked by the way you treat the subject.
On topic if you explode the scope of the topic out of proportion. The topic is not "Everybody who sponsors games c'm'ere and compete for attention". He was just making people aware of his offers, and there are plenty of threads doing the same for AG.
he was making people aware of his offers and I was criticising them. I never went "well AG is better so stfu"
Mmmnope. Maybe this is why you're so self-assured. You project your notions as being human nature. I just found out the other day that - in one of my larger projects - my partner is being paid and I'm not. Did I make a fuss and quit? No, because it's a cool game and I'm not a spoiled brat. $22,000 in debt, you can be sure I need the money more than you do, and yet...
you didn't make a fuss and quit because your partner is/was probably the lead in the project and you quitting would only have you lose the project and not gain anything later on, the conditions didn't change, you were aware you are not getting paid for the project. him getting paid isn't making your conditions worse though unfair.
Because life is not always a statistic or a machine code conditional. What if Mo offered you $100 more than AG up front with no contract? What then? I'm willing to bet you wouldn't take it. And if you would, you've got some serious questions to ask yourself.
Had mo offered me a 100$ more with no contact, full rights to the game and all the other terms AND (here is the importent part) Mo's site was trustworthy, with a good history, never scammed a soul , never conned a soul, didn't steal flash, and wasn't filled with assholes, then yes, I probably would. The reasons a 100$ more with mo isn't worth aren't just the contact, it's the fact you're dealing with mo who has a nasty history and all sad costumers.
--Inglor