US will attack even if no weapons
- P-Chan
-
P-Chan
- Member since: Oct. 3, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 10
- Blank Slate
Bush will attack Iraq even if it doesn't find any weapons. (One more reason why the war of Iraq is a load of horse shit.)
------------------------
WAR, WHATEVER
Bush aide: Inspections or not, we'll attack Iraq
Exclusive By Paul Gilfeather, Whitehall Editor
GEORGE Bush's top security adviser last night admitted the US would attack Iraq even if UN inspectors fail to find weapons.
Dr Richard Perle stunned MPs by insisting a "clean bill of health" from UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix would not halt America's war machine.
Evidence from ONE witness on Saddam Hussein's weapons programme will be enough to trigger a fresh military onslaught, he told an all- party meeting on global security.
Former defence minister and Labour backbencher Peter Kilfoyle said: "America is duping the world into believing it supports these inspections. President Bush intends to go to war even if inspectors find nothing.
"This make a mockery of the whole process and exposes America's real determination to bomb Iraq."
Dr Perle told MPs: "I cannot see how Hans Blix can state more than he can know. All he can know is the results of his own investigations. And that does not prove Saddam does not have weapons of mass destruction."
The chairman of America's defence policy board said: "Suppose we are able to find someone who has been involved in the development of weapons and he says there are stores of nerve agents. But you cannot find them because they are so well hidden.
"Do you actually have to take possession of the nerve agents to convince? We are not dealing with a situation where you can expect co-operation."
Mr Kilfoyle said MPs would be horrified at the admission. He added: "Because Saddam is so hated in Iraq, it would be easy to find someone to say they witnessed weapons building.
"Perle says the Americans would be satisfied with such claims even if no real evidence was produced.
"That's a terrifying prospect."
-BRITON Jack Roche, 49, a Muslim convert who claims to have met Osama bin Laden, has been charged in Australia with plotting to bomb the Israeli embassy in Canberra and a consulate in Sydney.
- MarijuanaClock
-
MarijuanaClock
- Member since: Mar. 9, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
No shit, you don't say? IT'S CALLED OIL. What did you expect from day one? It's about one thing, it's about what keeps america running, it's about control of the oil.
- MonkeyMan-Inc
-
MonkeyMan-Inc
- Member since: Sep. 21, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 07
- Blank Slate
At 11/25/02 03:04 AM, MarijuanaClock wrote: No shit, you don't say? IT'S CALLED OIL. What did you expect from day one? It's about one thing, it's about what keeps america running, it's about control of the oil.
My thoughts exactly!
- P-Chan
-
P-Chan
- Member since: Oct. 3, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 10
- Blank Slate
At 11/25/02 03:04 AM, MarijuanaClock wrote: No shit, you don't say? IT'S CALLED OIL. What did you expect from day one? It's about one thing, it's about what keeps america running, it's about control of the oil.
No need to act snobbish. I was merely adding enrichment into the forum like you yourself have done in the past.
There are at least 10 "I hate Bush" threads in existance, so I doubt my thread is repetative or excessively odvious.
- site4op
-
site4op
- Member since: Nov. 24, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 06
- Blank Slate
Okay, that was just gay.. This is a damn Flash/Programming posting page, not a whining area for the war going on in the world. Get a life.
- QuizMasterHeath
-
QuizMasterHeath
- Member since: Nov. 25, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
EVERYBODY HATES BUSH! WHY DO YOU THINK HE WON TEXAS? BECAUSE THEY LIKE HIM? NO! BECAUSE THEY WANTED HIM GONE!
- P-Chan
-
P-Chan
- Member since: Oct. 3, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 10
- Blank Slate
At 11/28/02 10:17 AM, site4op wrote: Okay, that was just gay.. This is a damn Flash/Programming posting page, not a whining area for the war going on in the world. Get a life.
Uhh... no it's not.
Follow this link and don't come back.
- LordKooler
-
LordKooler
- Member since: Nov. 26, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 45
- Blank Slate
That's it, Bush Should Not bomb iraq, He should go after osama Because in an al-queda tape, Osama said
That he would attack canada. That's why bush noticed
That he was alive.
- Nightshadeplus
-
Nightshadeplus
- Member since: Nov. 20, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 09
- Blank Slate
At 11/29/02 11:34 PM, LordKooler wrote: That's it, Bush Should Not bomb iraq, He should go after osama Because in an al-queda tape, Osama said
That he would attack canada. That's why bush noticed
That he was alive.
Attacking Iraq is purely a political agenda that involves other nations who wants to join in on the hope they'll get access to US markets and a slice of Iraqi oil pie. Bush talking about Iraq and placing a division line between who's with him and who's not before an election helped the Republicans demonize the Democrats into terror-supporting traitors in front of the public. As a result, the Republicans have control of both houses of Congress, making Congress Bush's 'rubber stamp' to approve anything and everything he wants, which is ironic because Bush called the Iraqi parliament Saddam's 'rubber stamp.' It's kinda funny and sad, meaning pathetic in this case, how the issue is not as it seems.
- Raptorman
-
Raptorman
- Member since: Apr. 27, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 10
- Blank Slate
You can go on all you want about how war is bad ect. ect. 'till the proverbial cows come home.
A partial playlist of Saddam's
Fact is that many people in the world would lose no sleep if this cocksucker (Saddam) was to die of hi-speed lead poisoning.That is why I find it hard to oppose the war effort.

