Damn, dude. Jesus existed. Buddha existed. Mohammed existed. And even if they didnt, you not adding them just shows how stupid this damn list is.
----------------Jesus-----------------
Will Durant-Secular scholar Will Durant, who left the Catholic Church and embraced humanism, also dismisses the idea in Caesar and Christ
That a few simple men should in one generation have invented so powerful and appealing a personality, so loft an ethic and so inspiring a vision of human brotherhood, would be a miracle far more incredible than any recorded in the Gospel. After two centuries of Higher Criticism the outlines of the life, character, and teaching of Christ, remain reasonably clear, and constitute the most fascinating feature of the history of Western man.
Rudolf Bultmann -Even the famously liberal Professor Bultmann, who argued against the historicity of much of the gospels, questions the reasonableness of Jesus Mythers themselves in Jesus and the Word.
Of course the doubt as to whether Jesus really existed is unfounded and not worth refutation. No sane person can doubt that Jesus stands as founder behind the historical movement whose first distinct stage is represented by the Palestinian community.
Robert Van Voorst -It is also obvious that the diverse and all but completely unanimous opinion of modern Jesus scholars and relevant historians remain completely unconvinced by the Jesus Myth arguments. Robert Van Voosrt writes in Jesus Outside the New Testament:
Contemporary New Testament scholars have typically viewed their arguments as so weak or bizarre that they relegate them to footnotes, or often ignore them completely.... The theory of Jesus' nonexistence is now effectively dead as a scholarly question.
http://www.bede.org.uk/price1.htm
---------------Mohammed---------------
However, the historicity of the biographical material about Muhammad presented in the Summary above is not generally contested. Traditionalists, both Muslim and non-Muslim, paint a much more detailed picture of Muhammad's life, as described below.
http://en.wikipedia...ow_about_Muhammad.3F
Seriously, take a friggin history class. Between the hadith and the sira it is UNDENIABLE he existed. Then you have the accounts of his ansar and the first Khalifah, Abu Bakr. He existed. Period.
--------------Buddha------------------
The historicity of Gotama Buddha has good support from many archaeological finds, including urns containing the remains of the Buddha and his two chief disciples (at different sites in India). Also, ruins of some of the cities mentioned in the ancient Pali texts have been found. Perhaps more importantly, Mahavira (an important figure in the Jain religion) is mentioned in the Buddhist scriptures, and Gotama is also mentioned in some Jain texts of that era. So each religion validates the historical existence of the other one's teacher.
http://www.ronaldbru..ants/0408almanac.htm
I refuse to go into more of them. You should know they exist, despite the fact secularlists think their lives were largely dramatized and mythologized. And even if they didnt exist, it doesnt matter. Their effect is HUGE.
Abraham existed. Moses existed. Confucius existed. Even if their lives were not as true as their religious texts state, they were real. Stop being stupid.
Jesus, you atheists are friggin dumb as shit sometimes.