Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I am not reviewing lately... I was on vacation and stuff, i hope i can get back on trail now.

At 7/11/08 06:58 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/10/08 05:27 PM, Bahamut wrote: *hits gfoxcook with a frying pan many times, just like on Bottom*

OOO YES, VERY NICE. PLEASE, SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

Rocket Launcher?

IT COULD MEAN 777, DAMMIT!!

777 >>>>>>>>>>>> 37, even if the latter COULD potentially stand for the former.

Yay. :)

666 >>>>>> 777 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...(most other numbers)...

Well, at least you admit that 777 is much much better than most other numbers.

Toohot100 could do with at least 1k blams.

Well, he can't have any of gfoxclock's, sorry.

Why not? XP

Get Flash this instant!

NEVAR.

OK...Go make some videos for YouTube!

gfox must love 39 more than 38.

IT'S SAFER. FURTHER FROM 37 FOR YOU TO BE RANKED AT.

Indeed.

But aside from that, no. They're both okay numbers. 38 has a slight edge due to evenness, but I don't mind most -9 ending odds, compared to how I feel about -1, -3, and -7 ending odds, at least.

111111111111.

You two are delaying gfox's epic reviews. XP

Not delaying. I already said I gave up on that weeks ago. The whole trying to review a shitload at once, thing. I've been reviewing in drips and drabs, I'm not waiting for anything specific (other than the urge to review MOAR) till I review your 15+ and other movies up to 777 to stop and pause for awhile there at teh number of the dragon, fear not.

Oh, so you won't wait until they'd die down? That's good. :)

I'll certainly be reviewing dose flashes before you start reviewing on Clock Day.

AWESOME!! :D Can't wait until then.

At 7/13/08 04:43 PM, Auz wrote: "Level ups"
Molotov - 5,000 reviews

Congrats.

Update #141

Thanks Auz. :)

39) 1236 || + 001 || Bahamut

Indeed, another review. Infact, I made another review after this update. :)

40) 1228 || + 012 || Zouk

Could pass me soon.

At 7/13/08 04:48 PM, Auz wrote: Most reviews written: Molotov
Most reviews lost: KWAS71KCK

Good, good. :)

New: phantomlassuk

Ah, hello there. :)

At 6/28/08 10:01 PM, Chibiwolf wrote: I hope to be a top reviewer one day. Doubt it but i think i am almost to my 50th review.

Let me be the first of many to tell you it a long journey, and if you're like me you'll get to a certain mark every so often and start. I've been less than 100 from the 1K mark for about four months now, and to get here it took about 9 months of atleast two reviews a day (I think, I don't know maths), but its still a steep climb.

Let me be the first of many to tell you it a long journey, and if you're like me you'll get to a certain mark every so often and start. I've been less than 100 from the 1K mark for about four months now, and to get here it took about 9 months of atleast two reviews a day (I think, I don't know maths), but its still a steep climb.

you really don't know maths:P
it's like 270x2 and that is 540

At 7/17/08 04:16 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:

At 7/16/08 09:40 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Well, at least X is taking a break to stay sane. Proto-X-Naut's gonna go postal soon if he keeps this up.

Well sometimes breaks are good, but i promise not to take months at a time lol, at the most my breaks will be 2weeks or so, depending whats going on at poxnora or real life stuffs, and my age is catching up with and im not as young as i once was so reviewings lots of flash can age ones mind, and sometimes semi heartattacks. ^_^

You take care of yourself, oh Xy one....

Being a 26 year old ancient man must be tough. I wouldn't know, my memory doesn't go back 5 years anymore, teh stresses of being a 31 year old even-ancienter man is even worse. ;_;

At 7/17/08 07:20 AM, rune-hunter wrote: I am not reviewing lately... I was on vacation and stuff, i hope i can get back on trail now.

IT BEGINS ANEW.

At 7/17/08 02:57 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 7/11/08 06:58 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/10/08 05:27 PM, Bahamut wrote: *hits gfoxcook with a frying pan many times, just like on Bottom*

OOO YES, VERY NICE. PLEASE, SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

Rocket Launcher?

Que?

777 >>>>>>>>>>>> 37, even if the latter COULD potentially stand for the former.

Yay. :)

I made you happy with 7-related stuffs for once. Yay.

666 >>>>>> 777 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...(most other numbers)...

Well, at least you admit that 777 is much much better than most other numbers.

Damn straight.

Well, he can't have any of gfoxclock's, sorry.

Why not? XP

Cause I want gfoxclock to have nice 15,000 blam, 15,000 save parity one day, and if he shares his now-scarce blams with your alt friends, he just won't ever make it there, or even to like 5k / 5k land (which would be an acceptable start.

OK...Go make some videos for YouTube!

NEVAR. Part 2.

But aside from that, no. They're both okay numbers. 38 has a slight edge due to evenness, but I don't mind most -9 ending odds, compared to how I feel about -1, -3, and -7 ending odds, at least.

111111111111.

As long as 1 is with other 1s, it is an exception to my -1 bleh rule. So is 81, as it is 9 squared. And 21, as it is 3 by 7 (yes, yes, I know what that looks like there, but we've had similar discussion about the "3 7s of 777" as well... huh, the SEKRIT 21 / 777 connection, eh?).

Oh, so you won't wait until they'd die down? That's good. :)

Nope, I gave up on that back in June, man. Just haven't felt like reviewing a ton since May, that's all.

I'll certainly be reviewing dose flashes before you start reviewing on Clock Day.

AWESOME!! :D Can't wait until then.

I'll try not to let you down. I may end up moving yours to the head of the line entirely to ensure the chance of that is low.

At 7/18/08 10:46 AM, rune-hunter wrote:

At 7/18/08 08:29 AM, Aci6 wrote: Let me be the first of many to tell you it a long journey, and if you're like me you'll get to a certain mark every so often and start. I've been less than 100 from the 1K mark for about four months now, and to get here it took about 9 months of atleast two reviews a day (I think, I don't know maths), but its still a steep climb.

you really don't know maths:P
it's like 270x2 and that is 540

Aci6 needs to use a/his OS's calculator if he really can't estimate how many reviews per day it takes over 9 months to hit 920ish reviews. Cause yeah... anyone with even a slight grasp of mental math... can tell it ain't just 2 a day.

CALCULATOR, Aci6! YOUR FRIEND!

At 7/21/08 10:47 PM, gfoxcook wrote: You take care of yourself, oh Xy one....
Being a 26 year old ancient man must be tough. I wouldn't know, my memory doesn't go back 5 years anymore, teh stresses of being a 31 year old even-ancienter man is even worse. ;_;

Heh 31 is a good age. you should enjoy it/

~X~

At 7/22/08 08:06 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote:

At 7/21/08 10:47 PM, gfoxcook wrote: You take care of yourself, oh Xy one....
Being a 26 year old ancient man must be tough. I wouldn't know, my memory doesn't go back 5 years anymore, teh stresses of being a 31 year old even-ancienter man is even worse. ;_;

Heh 31 is a good age. you should enjoy it/

HOW CAN 31 BE A GOOD AGE WHEN YOU ACTED LIKE BEING 26 WAS SUCH A CURSE, EH!?!? EH?!?!? #;-}>

At 7/26/08 02:47 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/22/08 08:06 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote:

HOW CAN 31 BE A GOOD AGE WHEN YOU ACTED LIKE BEING 26 WAS SUCH A CURSE, EH!?!? EH?!?!? #;-}>

Heh, 26? oh yeah i remember now lol. memory tends to go at times.

~X~

At 7/26/08 04:15 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Heh, 26? oh yeah i remember now lol. memory tends to go at times.

What were we talking about again?

26 apples versus 31 oranges, or something?

I'll take the 26 apples, thank you very much.

Guys, I don´t think there is gonna be an update today. I gotta go somewhere in about an hour and I have no idea when I´ll be home. If I´m home early I might still do an update, but if I´m home late I´ll just do it somewhere tomorrow. K?

At 7/27/08 03:48 AM, Auz wrote: Guys, I don´t think there is gonna be an update today. I gotta go somewhere in about an hour and I have no idea when I´ll be home. If I´m home early I might still do an update, but if I´m home late I´ll just do it somewhere tomorrow. K?

Meh, what's another day? There's plenty of flash to catch up on reviewing for me, so I'll get some numbers put up to be in the top 50 by then, K?

At 7/27/08 03:48 AM, Auz wrote: Guys, I don´t think there is gonna be an update today. I gotta go somewhere in about an hour and I have no idea when I´ll be home. If I´m home early I might still do an update, but if I´m home late I´ll just do it somewhere tomorrow. K?

lolcrackbingeparty

At 7/16/08 09:40 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/13/08 04:43 PM, Auz wrote:

At 7/3/08 10:38 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
Yeppers, it was indeed. Thanks for the congrats, but... that's an odd way to wish someone happy b-day. Are you congratting me for making it another year alive? #;-}>

Lol, I dunno. What else would be a proper way to congratulate you on your birthday one day early?

I was remarking that saying "congratulations" instead of "happy birthday" was kinda weird, in essence. #;-}>

Congratulations being, of course, what you say for just about every single thing... OTHER than a birthday, normally, in colloquial American English, at least.

Ah I see. I was thinking it was more something with the "...in advance" cause I can imagine that is a bit weird.

Anyways, in Holland, 'congratulations' and 'happy birthday' are both fine if you wanna wish someone a happy birthday. Congratulations is more common actually, so I thought it would be the same in English/American as well. Guess not...

I´m guessing you´re not a fan of prime numbers?

I was discussing primes a week or two ago elsewhere, probably with Bahamut.

You're correct. But it's really just a general distate with odd numbers versus even number. Being able to halve any even number and end up with an integer but AS A FUCKING RULE not being able to halve odd numbers... is probably what did it. They're unbalanced. Asymmetrical. Ugly. ;_;

But primes are even worse, yes. Because at least all -5 ending odds are divisible by 5, and many by 3, say.

Uhu, I see what you mean there. Agreed that most of them do look a bit ugly, as far as numbers can look ugly...

And I guess one of the reasons why 36 is your favorite number is cause it´s dividable by many numbers? (36, 18, 12, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1)

PLEASE TELL ME YOU'RE NOT JOKING, THOUGH!!!

I´m being dead serious here, don´t worry =/

When it was revealed, I was so relieved.

I was kinda wondering what I could be joking about there btw :p

But aside from that, no. They're both okay numbers. 38 has a slight edge due to evenness, but I don't mind most -9 ending odds, compared to how I feel about -1, -3, and -7 ending odds, at least.

11 and 17 are my favorite numbers =/ And 33 is okay, right?

11 is a GREAT odd number. Instead of having even balance, it just has "two identical number balance," and two 1s at that, 1 being an awesome number of course.

True.

17 is prime and ugly, but I don't hate it. Mostly because it's Lance Berkman's jersey number.

Never heard of him :p But I like 17 somehow even though there is not much to like about it. Perhaps because a 7 looks a bit like a 1? =/

33 is great. Eleven 3s? Damn straight. One more 3 and you get my beloved 36, too.

Uhu, although I immediatly associate it with NG´s level 33 icon which is a far more ugly version of my current icon. Only reason why I do not really like that number.

"Level ups"
Coop83 - Entered the top 50

Congrats!

Update #141
01) 17849 || + 048 || XwaynecoltX
02) 15856 || -- 016 || KWAS71KCK
03) 6804 || -- 010 || Cyberdevil
04) 5211 || -- 009 || milinko959
05) 5003 || + 003 || Molotov
06) 4902 || -- 002 || MI4-REAL-2001
07) 4830 || + 008 || YoinK
08) 4590 || + 004 || RyanAn
09) 4203 || -- 004 || M-A-R-C-U-S
10) 3995 || -- 004 || Hamy-jamy
11) 3393 || -- 002 || j00bie
12) 2652 || + 000 || Bezman
13) 2270 || -- 003 || Violet-AIM
14) 2039 || -- 002 || thepromaster
15) 2014 || -- 001 || artificial
16) 1935 || -- 002 || DUDE4U
17) 1841 || + 000 || Compdude
18) 1778 || -- 001 || AfroUnderscoreStud
19) 1758 || -- 005 || Dew
20) 1651 || + 000 || SeizureDog
21) 1636 || -- 002 || RemRulzz
22) 1602 || -- 001 || jonthomson
23) 1568 || + 002 || iscrulz
24) 1474 || + 000 || Darkside7000
25) 1470 || -- 001 || AntiGravity
26) 1454 || + 004 || Frenzy
27) 1436 || + 000 || wizardman
28) 1399 || -- 002 || DevastatoR-da-X
29) 1376 || + 000 || Michelangelo
30) 1367 || -- 002 || MegaGold
31) 1337 || + 003 || S-K
32) 1322 || -- 004 || Evil-C
33) 1290 || + 000 || MAYORMCHEESE (+1)
34) 1281 || -- 009 || ramagi (-1)
35) 1273 || -- 002 || wegra2007
36) 1269 || + 000 || Chris-Aldin
37) 1266 || -- 002 || zeppelinstl2007
38) 1241 || + 000 || Archile
39) 1236 || + 000 || Bahamut
40) 1228 || + 000 || Zouk
41) 1202 || + 000 || IceDragon64
42) 1196 || -- 002 || Livecorpse
43) 1147 || + 000 || bila
44) 1129 || -- 001 || TigerChick
45) 1112 || + 000 || OrgGladiator
46) 1088 || -- 001 || 2good2b4goten
47) 1085 || + 002 || hongkongexpress
48) 1082 || + 002 || BMX007
49) 1045 || -- 001 || HeRetiK
50) 1042 || + 015 || Coop83 (+2)

51) 1039 || + 000 || Freelance-Magician (-1)
52) 1036 || -- 002 || angstdrillhead (-1)
53) 1023 || -- 001 || GAMECUBICLE
54) 0986 || + 010 || VelvetDarkRocks (+2)
55) 0978 || -- 001 || Static (-1)
56) 0978 || -- 001 || kospas (-1)
57) 0971 || + 000 || Aznime
58) 0969 || + 000 || carmelhadinosaur
59) 0961 || + 000 || Dxkpower
60) 0958 || + 000 || Nylo
61) 0932 || + 000 || Darklilangel23
62) 0925 || -- 001 || sixflab
63) 0925 || + 001 || Aci6
64) 0913 || + 000 || U-Frontin (+1)
65) 0912 || -- 002 || RenegadeGirl (-1)
66) 0899 || + 001 || Jeffshaw
67) 0870 || + 000 || Starberry
68) 0863 || -- 001 || Th-e
69) 0862 || + 004 || rune-hunter (+1)
70) 0859 || -- 001 || Daedo-The-Mofo (-1)
71) 0855 || + 000 || Sk8ergirl14
72) 0855 || + 006 || ornery-scotsman
73) 0846 || -- 001 || Blackplastic
74) 0833 || -- 004 || TheSoulMan
75) 0823 || + 002 || Xalyx
76) 0820 || + 000 || wegra2
77) 0805 || -- 002 || FireHound
78) 0805 || -- 001 || Fatblimp23
79) 0795 || -- 002 || Shikyoh
80) 0795 || + 002 || KupaMan (+1)
81) 0793 || + 000 || RSQViper (-1)
82) 0791 || -- 001 || RandomFreak
83) 0791 || + 000 || rtil
84) 0780 || -- 002 || vdibv
85) 0777 || + 000 || Cajunspirit
86) 0760 || + 000 || Seamonky
87) 0759 || + 000 || AnzRage
88) 0754 || + 000 || RoweNuts
89) 0751 || + 000 || mjnoir1
90) 0747 || + 000 || EZ3
91) 0746 || + 008 || Admiral8Q (+1)
92) 0744 || + 000 || Havok44 (-1)
93) 0736 || + 000 || Geminate
94) 0729 || + 002 || Blaklyon
95) 0727 || + 000 || gfoxcook
96) 0711 || -- 001 || OCP-Lock
97) 0711 || + 008 || phantomlassuk (+3)
98) 0710 || + 000 || bumcheekcity (-1)
99) 0706 || + 000 || SwitchBladeClock (-1)
100) 705 || + 000 || MasterStalker (-1)

Most reviews written: XwaynecoltX
Most reviews lost: KWAS71KCK
Most ranked up: phantomlassuk
Most ranked down: MasterStalker, SwitchBladeClock, bumcheekcity, Havok44, RSQViper, Daedo-The-Mofo, RenegadeGirl, kospas, Static, angstdrillhead, Freelance-Magician, ramagi
New: -

Top 10 this update:
01) +048 | XwaynecoltX
02) +015 | Coop83
03) +010 | VelvetDarkRocks
04) +008 | YoinK
05) +008 | phantomlassuk
06) +008 | Admiral8Q
07) +006 | ornery-scotsman
08) +004 | RyanAn
09) +004 | Frenzy
10) +004 | rune-hunter

Thanks for the update, Auz! Much appreciated

At 7/28/08 05:10 PM, Auz wrote: "Level ups"
Coop83 - Entered the top 50

Suddenly, I feel like I'm home *drops bag, slumps on couch*

49) 1045 || -- 001 || HeRetiK
50) 1042 || + 015 || Coop83 (+2)

I think it might take me a while, but I've still got some ranks to climb :)

51) 1039 || + 000 || Freelance-Magician (-1)
52) 1036 || -- 002 || angstdrillhead (-1)

Thanks for getting out of the way, guys ;)

Top 10 this update:
01) +048 | XwaynecoltX
02) +015 | Coop83
03) +010 | VelvetDarkRocks

Wow, not too much activity on here. It will be interesting to see if I can keep this pace up for next time

yeah its been a slow week.

it may get slower with poxnora releasing another expansion so beta is gonna open up, but i will get a few in.

Nice list as always Auz thanks for the time on these lists.

~X~

At 7/21/08 10:47 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/17/08 02:57 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 7/11/08 06:58 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 7/10/08 05:27 PM, Bahamut wrote: *hits gfoxcook with a frying pan many times, just like on Bottom*

OOO YES, VERY NICE. PLEASE, SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

Rocket Launcher?

Que?

May I destroy you with a Rocket Launcher?

777 >>>>>>>>>>>> 37, even if the latter COULD potentially stand for the former.

Yay. :)

I made you happy with 7-related stuffs for once. Yay.

Indeed, thank you very much gfox! :D

Well, at least you admit that 777 is much much better than most other numbers.

Damn straight.

Everyone's happy.

Why not? XP

Cause I want gfoxclock to have nice 15,000 blam, 15,000 save parity one day, and if he shares his now-scarce blams with your alt friends, he just won't ever make it there, or even to like 5k / 5k land (which would be an acceptable start.

And I want Toohot100 to have a lot of blams. Dunno about it's permanent retirement yet, but I'm sure it won't get anymore than 30k blams. However, considering Toohot's current pace, it'll take YEARS!

OK...Go make some videos for YouTube!

NEVAR. Part 2.

You bastard! Why can't you make anything?

Oh, so you won't wait until they'd die down? That's good. :)

Nope, I gave up on that back in June, man. Just haven't felt like reviewing a ton since May, that's all.

And I've not felt like reviewing a ton since April. :P However, I'll go and review a ton sometime soon.

AWESOME!! :D Can't wait until then.

I'll try not to let you down. I may end up moving yours to the head of the line entirely to ensure the chance of that is low.

13 days until Clock Day. 8)

At 7/28/08 05:10 PM, Auz wrote: "Level ups"
Coop83 - Entered the top 50

HURRAY!
</Chester A. Bum>

Update #141

Thanks for the update Auz.

39) 1236 || + 000 || Bahamut

Of course, no new reviews as usual, BUT at least I stay at 1236 reviews for another update. Hopefully I can stay there until the next update.

At 7/28/08 05:13 PM, Auz wrote: Most reviews written: XwaynecoltX
Most reviews lost: KWAS71KCK

Awesome.

Most ranked up: phantomlassuk

Congrats. :)

At 7/28/08 05:10 PM, Auz wrote:

33) 1290 || + 000 || MAYORMCHEESE (+1)

lmfaaao

Ladies and gentlemen. How would you like to have 3 guaranteed responses to boost your review/response ratio? How would you like to increase your responses by 3 reviews? Pretty much increasing your ranking? Well that answer is simple. Simply watch and review my 3 movies, and I will respond to them. It is my reward for your viewing. This shall beneit both of us. My movie which is underrated shall be exposed to a larger audience, and you guys can benefit from my responds. Will you guys be so kind as to check out my series and review them?

Here is the link

At 8/3/08 01:07 PM, Jaiba wrote: Ladies and gentlemen. *snip*

This isn't the right thread to advertise your flashes. But you may want to check out the Review Request Club. You'll get around 7 or 8 reviews if you request your submissions there. ;)

Yah! I made it into the top ten for last week, lol. I have'nt done that a lot recently... I'll try and keep it up. Hope you all are doing well.

I like , barely have any reviews.

At 8/3/08 11:35 PM, RyanAn wrote: Yah! I made it into the top ten for last week, lol. I have'nt done that a lot recently... I'll try and keep it up. Hope you all are doing well.

Glad to see your return and hope you are doing well yourself.

Also how bout them Cubs. =P

I got some reviews in,

At 8/5/08 12:24 AM, 61 wrote: I got some reviews in,

You should review every game and every movie you play and watch, you rack up much reviews when you do that.
I got around 866 reviews or so.

At 8/8/08 03:58 PM, rune-hunter wrote:

At 8/5/08 12:24 AM, 61 wrote: I got some reviews in,

You should review every game and every movie you play and watch, you rack up much reviews when you do that.
I got around 866 reviews or so.

If I did that then I would have well over a couple thousand reviews from watching all of the movies and playing all of the games. I just run into movies and games that I just can't review for some reason or that I have nothing to say about them at all. I will eventually make this list, but it will be a long drawn out process.

How do you decide the "best" reviewers? Do you actually go through people's reviews and pick them, or do you just decide on how many reviews that person has...?

At 8/9/08 12:38 AM, kRaZyAzN wrote: How do you decide the "best" reviewers? Do you actually go through people's reviews and pick them, or do you just decide on how many reviews that person has...?

This list isn't about the "best" reviewers (because that's highly subjective). It's about who has the most reviews.

At 8/9/08 07:39 AM, Haggard wrote:

At 8/9/08 12:38 AM, kRaZyAzN wrote: How do you decide the "best" reviewers? Do you actually go through people's reviews and pick them, or do you just decide on how many reviews that person has...?

This list isn't about the "best" reviewers (because that's highly subjective). It's about who has the most reviews.

Yeah, if it were a list of who writes the most constuctive reviews, people like KWAS71KCK would not be anywhere near the top. I know for a fact that people like Little-Rena and Haggard would certainly be there and i hope that I'd be considered in that number as well

At 8/9/08 04:24 PM, Coop83 wrote:

At 8/9/08 07:39 AM, Haggard wrote:
This list isn't about the "best" reviewers (because that's highly subjective). It's about who has the most reviews.

Yeah, if it were a list of who writes the most constuctive reviews, people like KWAS71KCK would not be anywhere near the top. I know for a fact that people like Little-Rena and Haggard would certainly be there and i hope that I'd be considered in that number as well

Oh ok, thanks for clearing that up for me. Now, how many reviews does the number one reviewer have?