At 4/20/08 03:32 PM, Auz wrote:
At 4/14/08 01:10 PM, Bahamut wrote:
I'd say give it two more updates and if things are still slow, then update the list once every fortnight.
Alright, I´ll do that.
So you will be updating it once more, next weekend... and if it doesn't speed up by then, we can expect an update two weeks from next weekend instead of just one week from it?
At 4/16/08 07:31 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
So we should expect the next update.... when?
Still next week, for now.
Roger dodger.
Alright then. Well nevermind, I´ll just keep using notepad.
Whatever rocks your boat, man. #;-}>
Hmm mmm you got a point there. But even with your activity included, overall it still wasn´t too impressive so it doesn´t even matter whether you counted or not ;)
Hm. I'd call a person with +36 reviews (that rune-hunter fellow), and a person with +33 reviews (that'd have been me), and a person with +30 reviews (Coop, I believe?).... quite active. that's +100 reviews from just the top 3 users that update!
Well, I want it to have only 10 people and as it goes in most official lists, if two people are tied they skip the next rank. It looked a bit silly last week though... =/
Oh, I see. So all the people you listed as tied for #9 were really 9, 10, 11, 12, etc.... and that's why there was no #10. Gotcha. #;-}>
I say do it now. But either way, TELL US YOUR UPDATE PLANS, AUZ. So teh gfox knows when to turn on the review engines.
Alright, here´s the plan:
As you can see the activity was once again not that impressive this week. It does look a little bit better than the former weeks though, so I agree with Bahamut to do one more update next week. If most of the people are still going slow with barely any rank-changes, then I´ll start doing bi-weekly updates. (Probably what´s gonna happen...).
Wahoo! I am all for teh bi-weekly in that event.
However, if that´s the case, I don´t know if I´m actually gonna post next weeks update though. I also have the audio reviewers list to update on friday which is currently updated bi-weekly as well. So if I just wait for one more week I only have to update one of the lists each week (and not 2 of them in one and 0 in the next). If I decide to do this, the next time you see an update will be on the 4th of May.
Huh? You mean... you'd pull all the data next weekend, but if it's not that active, you won't bother posting an update, you'll wait 1 more week and then re-pull the data?
So that will lead to you either doing this:
update on 4/27
update on 5/11
update on 5/25
or this:
update on 5/04
update on 5/18
update on 6/01
?
If next weeks update is quite a bit better than this weeks, I´ll do another update the week after. If that update is also better, then I´ll do another one the week after that. Then I might continue with doing weekly updates.
whahahaaaaa.... Okay. I guess I'm going to have to wait until next Sunday, then. If you update, then fine, and I'll have one week (or two weeks) to do my thing.
But if it turns out you're going to not update anytime between 4/20 and 5/04... and I wait until 4/27 to start reviewing.... I've lost a full 7 days... and I'll only have 7 days to use... instead of a full 14. IOW, if I knew right now you weren't going to update till 5/04, I'd start reviewing right now and use all 14 days!
But if I knew right now you're going to update on 4/27, I'd wait till 4/27 or 4/28 to start reviewing. Does that make sense? ;_;
I´ll let you guys know what I´m gonna do next week.
:::waits with baited breath:::
It's been a long time I've actually wanted to perform well on a list update. Since 2006... it's pretty amazing. You should take this as a massive compliment to your top 100 reviewers list. #;-}>
Update #135
WOOT WOOT! Thanks, as always, for the hard notepad-y work!
1) 17190 || -- 007 || XwaynecoltX
2) 15951 || -- 013 || KWAS71KCK
3) 06849 || -- 001 || Cyberdevil
4) 05249 || -- 002 || milinko959
5) 04914 || -- 004 || MI4-REAL-2001
6) 04784 || -- 003 || YoinK
7) 04602 || -- 002 || RyanAn
WHYYYY... WHY.....
12) 2591 || + 018 || Bezman
Yay for Bezman.
At 4/20/08 03:34 PM, Auz wrote:
59) 0933 || + 015 || Coop83 (+3)
And for teh Coops.
93) 0722 || + 000 || Blaklyon
94) 0711 || + 000 || bumcheekcity
95) 0711 || + 000 || OCP-Lock
96) 0711 || + 011 || gfoxcook (+3)
97) 0707 || + 000 || SwitchBladeClock (-1)
98) 0706 || + 000 || MasterStalker (-1)
99) 0702 || + 000 || Hydecka (-1)
100) 698 || + 000 || Zamochit-1
No activity immediately below me, good, good... but now I'm safe, ahving moved up from 700 to 707 a few days ago, and up to 711 early on Sunday morning. I feel secure now.
At 4/20/08 03:43 PM, Coop83 wrote:
Thanks fo the update, Auz. Nice work and I'm now a top 60 Reviewer. Closing slowly on the fourth figure, which will be a nice addition to my collection of stats :)
Congrats on the top 60ness, man.
Most ranked up: Coop83, gfoxcook
W00t, gfox and Coop! Big Green Machine for the win!
YATTA NE! I'd just like to point out, since I know you'd do the same if our roles were reversed... that I'm tied at 711 with two other 711-having folks. If Auz sorted the list (say if he used a spreadsheet instead of notepad to make it) by signup date, I woulda been +5 to your +3. #;-}>
Still, I'll take a tie with teh Coopster. It is an honour.
Top 10 this week:
01) +018 | Bezman
02) +015 | Coop83
03) +011 | gfoxcook
Some good movement from three users this week. Needs to be more, but I'l take the bonuses when I'm advancing up the ranks and closing in on the top spot most weeks at the moment.
Well, there was a drop off after me down to +4... but all the way down to 10th it stayed at +2... so that's far superior to the past couple of weeks, when Auz had problems finding people to fill out the top 10 properly, right?
I can't wait for more RRC members to get into this list - we're overdue!
Oh shit.... maybe I'm not so safe after all. :::puts 777 plan into effect... EARLY?:::