At 9/1/16 10:20 PM, TaintedLogic wrote:
At 9/1/16 03:29 PM, Auz wrote:
Hello everyone! As promised, here is the update!Well, I appreciate your hard work, Auz, but I have reason to believe that this list excludes at least several individuals. I'm skeptical of how members get added to the list. Is it possible that NG staff can do a section-search of accounts before each update to verify that there aren't others out there who have been left off? Given the existing user statistics pages, it seems that they are capable of doing this.
Sorry if I'm coming across as ungrateful. I just want the reviewers list to be as accurate as possible. ;)
Well yes, one problem has always been that the tracking of new users was done sort-of manually. Murray once passed me a long list of people with lots of reviews and/or high weekly gains, but admittedly that was a few years ago and I guess some eligible users, who started reviewing more recently, might be completely off the radar until they speak up here.
I guess Bren could check for the top reviewers in NG's databases and compile a list of names, but I'm not sure if he has the time to make an automated tool for it or do monthly check-ups for all these stat lists. However, I suppose it couldn't hurt to ask him if he can provide a list of, say, the top 1000 reviewers at this moment to improve the accuracy a bit. So, sure, I'll send him a PM to ask if he can help out with this.
At 9/1/16 11:13 PM, NekoMika wrote:
Hope this means more monthly updates, doesn't show that I have wrote a lot since last update but that's fine.
Sorry! Apparently your review count didn't register last month.