Forum Topic: Charlie And The Chocolate Factory.

(655 views • 36 replies)

This topic is 2 pages long. [ 1 | 2 ]

<< < > >>
None

electricBIue

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:06 AM

electricBIue NEUTRAL LEVEL 15

Sign-Up: 10/10/03

Posts: 942

At 8/13/05 11:54 PM, AznRedneck wrote: I like cadny

Word.


None

hoagiejones

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:07 AM

hoagiejones NEUTRAL LEVEL 13

Sign-Up: 03/08/01

Posts: 1,306

i thought it was good
i liked the additions to the story


None

inflateabledummy

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:40 AM

inflateabledummy EVIL LEVEL 11

Sign-Up: 02/28/05

Posts: 455

At 8/13/05 10:53 PM, TheRevirdDotCom3 wrote: no way, the old one was much better, i grew up with that movie

I agree with you but i did think it was good but still if i did grow attached to the 1st one!

Yeah whats it is son!

BBS Signature

None

Romolo

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:52 AM

Romolo LIGHT LEVEL 19

Sign-Up: 10/24/04

Posts: 1,188

At 8/13/05 10:51 PM, TheRevirdDotCom wrote: So do you think it should have been remade? And which one was better?

It wasn't remade, it was another adaptation of Roald Dahl's novel.

As Green_Lanturn said, it's pretty much a question that is self-explanatory. The original was deemed a classic, and nothing can top a classic. Not to say I didn't enjoy the most recent adaptation. I'm just saying there was no need for another version. That would be the equivalent of remaking A Streetcar Named Desire with another actor playing Stanley Kowalski. Gene Wilder did a fantastic job of making that role forever his. Look into the commentary of the classic or read his auto-biography, he put countless hours of work in creating a unique, two-sided, brilliant, and slightly mad chocolateer.

BBS Signature

Happy

glarbage

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:53 AM

glarbage EVIL LEVEL 02

Sign-Up: 07/30/05

Posts: 6

well, i think that both movies are bad ass.


None

JeremyLokken

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 12:54 AM

JeremyLokken EVIL LEVEL 18

Sign-Up: 12/16/99

Posts: 1,811

The new one rocks on a different level. It's pretty funny too. The Willy Wonka character is focused on more in the new one and explains a lot about why he is the way he is. It's not a remake, I heard it was based on the book. A lot of the humor wasn't even for kids. I saw it with kids in the audience, kids weren't laughing. A few adults laughed, but now the question of whether if it's a comedy, drama, adventure, fantasy, scifi?


None

mrFAHRENHEIT

Reply To Post Reply & Quote

Posted at: 8/14/05 01:03 AM

mrFAHRENHEIT NEUTRAL LEVEL 07

Sign-Up: 05/11/05

Posts: 444

the actors name is gene wilder of young frankenstien fame, i saw him on conan the other night.

and secondly, i dont consider myself a movie buff but i really couldnt bring myself to like the remake. yes it was well made but the writing and concepts were just unbearable. Depp became a popularty puppet, i wish they would have gone with a less known face. the reason i saw it in the first place is because its a burton film which i later found out that his creative director did most of the work which further dissapointed me. the oompa loompas were gay for lack of a better word, all done by the same person and their songs werent entertaining or original, rather a cheap gimick for laughs.

i much prefer the classic.


All times are Eastern Standard Time (GMT -5) | Current Time: 12:27 PM

<< Back

This topic is 2 pages long. [ 1 | 2 ]

<< < > >>
You need a Grounds Gold Account to post on the NG BBS! If you don't have one, click here to sign up now! It's fast, free, and easy — and opens up tons of great NG features!