Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Over half the stuff that comes out of her mouth makes me want to fishtail her with flaming fly swatter. God damnit anyway.

I don't remember exactly how it went, but it went something like this:

Interview guy: "So, do you think that the United States should invade all anti-American countries, overthrow their dictators, and convert them all to Christianity?"
Coulter: "Now more than ever!"

She gives all conservatives an even worse name than it already is. I'd kiss Bill O'Reilly's ass if someone were to just get her out of the damn world.

Ann Coulter is the most right-winged, conservative, neo-nazi, rascist peice of shit on this Earth. Everytime she speaks, I just want to gouge my eyes out with an ice-pick. Not to mention that her long neck makes her look like a giraffe.

This thread is useless without pics.

At 6/8/05 04:22 PM, chuckfucter wrote: This thread is useless without pics.

http://www.cpl.net/~carville/ann_coulter-lingerie.jpg

Theres a pic.

And this site rocks:
http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/

Lol, she is so stupid, I live in israel yet I've seen like 10 threads about her failing interviews and that stuff... how did she get such a powerful job?

yeah fuck ann coulter shes a neonazi fascist nazi mcfascist self-hating minority.

I still can't get over her neck...

she is a man!

Seriously, she is most arrogant, racist, kkk supporting american i've ever seen (sorry red_skunk.)

At 6/8/05 04:29 PM, Cahenn wrote: Lol, she is so stupid, I live in israel yet I've seen like 10 threads about her failing interviews and that stuff... how did she get such a powerful job?

There's a shortcut in the bureaucracy of American politics called a blowjob.

Remind me why I'm not a liberal aga...oh yeah, I remember.

Liberals have been using this tactic for decades. If you don't support affirmative action and/or support strong border control, than you're a racist. If you don't want gays marrying, you hate gays. If you speak out against liberals or liberalism, you're "spreading hatred" or "inciting violence." And all you have to do is prove your rhetoric is take their quotes out of context and then talk about what a bitch nazi neo-con-fascist she is.

No intelligent debate can happen under these circumstances. That's why I'd rather bash liberals than try to debate them. I have a feeling that's why she does too. She just calls a spade as a spade and treats you all with the respect you deserve (which is none).

I feel like I'm on DU. The left are a bunch of idiots.

At 6/8/05 04:49 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: Remind me why I'm not a liberal aga...oh yeah, I remember.

Liberals have been using this tactic for decades. If you don't support affirmative action and/or support strong border control, than you're a racist. If you don't want gays marrying, you hate gays. If you speak out against liberals or liberalism, you're "spreading hatred" or "inciting violence." And all you have to do is prove your rhetoric is take their quotes out of context and then talk about what a bitch nazi neo-con-fascist she is.

No intelligent debate can happen under these circumstances. That's why I'd rather bash liberals than try to debate them. I have a feeling that's why she does too. She just calls a spade as a spade and treats you all with the respect you deserve (which is none).

I feel like I'm on DU. The left are a bunch of idiots.

Pot calling the kettle black, in my opinion. If you support stem-cell research, you're a baby-killing bastard. If you belive in separation af church and stsate, you're a Jesus-hating atheist. If you don't agree with anything Bush says, you're unamerican. It's a tactic everone uses, and everyone is a dick for using it.

I just want to say that I think menstruating vaginas can be beautiful (so I'm into Biology, grow up) and that Ann Coultier definitely can't be beautiful. Motion to change the title to "Ann Coultier is far, far worse than a menstruating vagina."

At 6/8/05 04:54 PM, Sivak wrote: Pot calling the kettle black, in my opinion. If you support stem-cell research, you're a baby-killing bastard. If you belive in separation af church and stsate, you're a Jesus-hating atheist. If you don't agree with anything Bush says, you're unamerican. It's a tactic everone uses, and everyone is a dick for using it.

The only difference is that when conservatives do it they are right. If you support stem cell research, what you support is taking the life of a living fetus and extracting its code for research. That's wrong. If you believe in separation of church and state, fine, good for you, but if you believe it's in the Constitution and not a judicial precedent, you're wrong. And if you want to ban children from praying in school or saying "under God" in the pledge, then yes, you are an extremist atheist nutjob.

And the reason we question liberal's patriotism is because they spit on the American flag and burn it during protests. I have liberal friends who openly admit they don't like America.

At 6/8/05 04:54 PM, Sivak wrote:

Pot calling the kettle black, in my opinion. If you support stem-cell research, you're a baby-killing bastard. If you belive in separation af church and stsate, you're a Jesus-hating atheist. If you don't agree with anything Bush says, you're unamerican. It's a tactic everone uses, and everyone is a dick for using it.

Amen.

At 6/8/05 05:01 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:
The only difference is that when conservatives do it they are right. If you support stem cell research, what you support is taking the life of a living fetus and extracting its code for research. That's wrong. If you believe in separation of church and state, fine, good for you, but if you believe it's in the Constitution and not a judicial precedent, you're wrong. And if you want to ban children from praying in school or saying "under God" in the pledge, then yes, you are an extremist atheist nutjob.

And the reason we question liberal's patriotism is because they spit on the American flag and burn it during protests. I have liberal friends who openly admit they don't like America.

So you're basically saying that what you value and find to be moral is the correct way to do things? Just because you don't believe in abortion, stem cell research, upon other things doesn't mean that it is wrong to do such deeds.

The thing I don't get about you neo-cons is how you can claim that abortion is wrong but the death penalty is alright. The process of abortion involves the removal of an UNDEVELOPED FETUS whereas an execution is the extermination of a fully grown man/woman. Sure, you can claim that they have been convicted of a crime and therefore deserve to die. Think back to church, what would Jesus do? Glide excalibur through their throats and have it be the end of them?

Ever hear the saying, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Think about it.

At 6/8/05 05:01 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:

If you support stem cell research, what you support is taking the life of a living fetus and extracting its code for research. That's wrong.

Actually, the embryo's used in stemm cell reaserch come from invitro fertilization. They are extra's that get destroyed as medical waste. So if it gets outlawed, they die anyway. And so do all the sick children who no longer have any hope for a cure.

At 6/8/05 04:49 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: The left are a bunch of idiots.

Extreme liberals are as dumb as extreme conservatives are hate mongers. I think you’re taking this post to be something it is not. Ann Coulter is a fascist idiot, period. It has nothing to do with conservative or liberal views.

Liberals: Hey look, the Republicans have their counter for Michael Moore, because she betrays the great god of lying bullshit, we will call her a evil, satan worshipping Nazi. Yes, because Michael Moore is always telling the truth, Michael Moore can't lie, that's impossible.

Just shut up. Seriously, stop your bitching because Ann Coulter makes fun of you guys, but when Michael Moore does it, he is always right.

At 6/8/05 05:01 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:
And the reason we question liberal's patriotism is because they spit on the American flag and burn it during protests. I have liberal friends who openly admit they don't like America.

I'm pretty sure there's something in the founding of america that gives the citizenry the right to disagree with the government is they so choose. Something about "freedom", whatever that is. Maybe you don't understand that these liberlas don't hate america, they just hate what they percieve america to be NOW. They may be staring back through nostalgic, rose tinted glasses at what they think america SHOULD be but you can't just declare them "wrong" simply because they disagree, otherwise you're pissing on the democracy you claim so readily to defend and uphold.

At 6/8/05 05:59 PM, commanderkai wrote: Liberals: Hey look, the Republicans have their counter for Michael Moore, because she betrays the great god of lying bullshit, we will call her a evil, satan worshipping Nazi. Yes, because Michael Moore is always telling the truth, Michael Moore can't lie, that's impossible.

LOL@U
Do you serious think anyone takes Michael Moore seriously? Please, he's an entertainer, not a politician. On the other hand, Ann Coulter is an actual politican. The fact that you bring up little Mikey M in this post just goes to show how little you know.

BfC made the point that it sucked being a teenager and that the adults in America are doing nothing to help, it had some good points favoring the popular opinion of the youth and pointing the finger ignorant adults who carry many guns and neglect their children.

see that's what wrong nowadays. instead of blaming the kid, they blame the adults and say the kids have some sort of disease and pop them on pills. EVer wonder why there were no ADD kids back in the 50's. Because adults had the power to punish thier kids. Nowadays kids can sue thier parents, call the constable, or get a divorce. Parents can't even hit thier kids anymore. Me dad used to use the belt on me if i did bad things i just learned not to do those things again.

At 6/8/05 05:08 PM, Wadezilla wrote:

At 6/8/05 05:01 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:
The only difference is that when conservatives do it they are right. If you support stem cell research, what you support is taking the life of a living fetus and extracting its code for research. That's wrong. If you believe in separation of church and state, fine, good for you, but if you believe it's in the Constitution and not a judicial precedent, you're wrong. And if you want to ban children from praying in school or saying "under God" in the pledge, then yes, you are an extremist atheist nutjob.

And the reason we question liberal's patriotism is because they spit on the American flag and burn it during protests. I have liberal friends who openly admit they don't like America.

So you're basically saying that what you value and find to be moral is the correct way to do things? Just because you don't believe in abortion, stem cell research, upon other things doesn't mean that it is wrong to do such deeds.

No, just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean that I'm correct. It's right because it just is. If you don't believe in God or divine rules, fine, whatever. That doesn't make it wrong.

The thing I don't get about you neo-cons is how you can claim that abortion is wrong but the death penalty is alright. The process of abortion involves the removal of an UNDEVELOPED FETUS whereas an execution is the extermination of a fully grown man/woman.

A convicted criminal, probably rapist or murderer vs. a helpless fetus that has nerve endings long before the first trimester is over.

Sure, you can claim that they have been convicted of a crime and therefore deserve to die. Think back to church, what would Jesus do? Glide excalibur through their throats and have it be the end of them?

Jesus was a different breed. I don't know if he'd be for the death penalty or not. The earlier teachings in the Bible said that men could have their own vengeance, and then they relinquished that right when government was established. But if you truly believe that religion and politics shouldn't mix this should be irrelevant.

Ever hear the saying, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Think about it.

No it doesn't. Than everyone will have just one eye. STFU. Ever heard the saying, "If Democrats remain the party of abortion, they are going to wipe out their future voting base?"

At 6/8/05 05:08 PM, Sivak wrote: Actually, the embryo's used in stemm cell reaserch come from invitro fertilization. They are extra's that get destroyed as medical waste. So if it gets outlawed, they die anyway. And so do all the sick children who no longer have any hope for a cure.

First of all, nothing is getting outlawed. Second of all, if the idea is so great, let the private market take it up. Why does the government have to grant money to stem cell research, a practice that is most definitely un-ethical and immoral? Have universities or research facilities buy the eggs and play with them like mad scientists. Go ahead. It's not government's job to begin with.

I was thinking about something. At least in Ann Coulter's case, if she says something nutty, the conservatives can just say, "Well, she's just an idiot. She doesn't speak for me." You guys have Howard Dean. You can't say, "Well, he's just an idiot," because he's the DNC Chair. So every stupid, idiotic thing that he says, you guys are represented by his retarded comments whether you like it or not! lol. (granted, most of you probably think that his comments are right on the money anyway.)

Actually, Howard Deans counter is Zell Miller.

Jeez, aren't pundits made for entertainment? Ann Coulter is funny to read, as is Michael Moore. I don't agree with either of them on many of thier points, but they are still funny.

Fahrenheit 911 and How to Talk to a Liberal (if you must), are both more fun then fact. It's hard to deny.

At 6/8/05 05:08 PM, Wadezilla wrote:

At 6/8/05 05:01 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote:
The only difference is that when conservatives do it they are right. If you support stem cell research, what you support is taking the life of a living fetus and extracting its code for research. That's wrong.

So you're basically saying that what you value and find to be moral is the correct way to do things? Just because you don't believe in abortion, stem cell research, upon other things doesn't mean that it is wrong to do such deeds.

im a republican who believes in stem cell research, and i openly admit it, but killing a fetus isnt the only way to stem cells, just use the umbilical cord. just for the record im also pro life

At 6/8/05 07:24 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: I was thinking about something. At least in Ann Coulter's case, if she says something nutty, the conservatives can just say, "Well, she's just an idiot. She doesn't speak for me."

If only more conservatives WOULD say that Coulter would probably not have the same ability to raise ire as she does now.

Good point about privatized stem cell research though. I am curious as to why no private firm has begun research. Then again perhaps they have and simply aren't being upfront about it (not that that would make sense, it's not like it's a touchy subject or anything... oh wait...)

The world needs Ann Coulter, just like the world needs Michael Moore. If we didn't have outspoken people on the far side of the political scale it woudl be boring and eventuallyt we would al lbe the same. Its people like this who make each of us different. I certainly would nto want to live in a world where evryone thought the same, even if it is the way I think.

And if we shut up her or Moore, what kind of country are we? Premotign cenorship. Everyone has the right to speak their political vies, no matter how oout there theya re. If we are willing to shut up people who don't agree with us, what doe sthat say about us?

She wouldn't get half the attention she gets if she wasn't a woman. NICE TOPIC NAME, TWATZOR.