Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/13/09 03:34 PM, TheReno wrote: We need to get a NSFW license

We DEFINITELY need to! And I just played Coil, and now I have a strange outlook on the world.

At 6/13/09 03:34 PM, TheReno wrote: We need to get a NSFW license

I have one.

At 6/13/09 01:12 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/13/09 09:16 AM, TheAmateurAnimator wrote: Anyone else here have any good Tasmanian tiger furries?

Why yes.

Indeed, my good sir.

At 6/12/09 07:53 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/12/09 04:17 PM, Sunglasses wrote: there's one that...lets just say I can' post it here for...obvious reasons.

lol, necrotic rape

Retract that, but click this link with extreme caution: NSFW

now why did i have to go and do that?Damn.

At 6/13/09 04:49 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/13/09 03:34 PM, TheReno wrote: We need to get a NSFW license

I have one.

Quick, we must share our stuff with the rest of newgrounds!!

We'd actually have perma-bans from life then...

At 6/13/09 03:34 PM, TheReno wrote: We need to get a NSFW license

Oh... And thats not suggestive in any way... Is it?...
Just like this isn't suggestive either...

Hmmm tomorrow I will ask wade to allow us to post NSFW pics

At 6/13/09 10:48 PM, TheReno wrote: Hmmm tomorrow I will ask wade to allow us to post NSFW pics

As long as they are in good taste...
We may be sick and wrong, but no cub / vore / scat or all the other crap some sicko's come up with...

At 6/13/09 10:48 PM, TheReno wrote: Hmmm tomorrow I will ask wade to allow us to post NSFW pics

I seriously doubt he'd make an exception for us.

In the meantime, have another Tasmanian tiger.

At 6/13/09 08:47 PM, Akkryls wrote: Oh... And thats not suggestive in any way... Is it?...
Just like this isn't suggestive either...

Hey smartass, no one said we couldn't post suggestive pics now did they?

My thought on it is, if it's not showing any that would normally have to be censored, it's sfw. But knowing some people, they'd smartass they're way around that.

...picture related.

At 6/13/09 11:09 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/13/09 08:47 PM, Akkryls wrote: Oh... And thats not suggestive in any way... Is it?...
Just like this isn't suggestive either...

Hey smartass, no one said we couldn't post suggestive pics now did they?

My thought on it is, if it's not showing any that would normally have to be censored, it's sfw. But knowing some people, they'd smartass they're way around that.

...picture related.

Now thats just...
Now...
That's...
I..
*Drools and stares*
Damnit... That's just unfair...

Yeah I can only post stuff like this if I censor it WTF?!!

At 6/14/09 07:06 AM, gregaaron89 wrote: Yeah I can only post stuff like this if I censor it WTF?!!

Wasn't Adam Wan working on some huge "yiffy" movie or something?...

And its okay to post as long as its censored?...

Cue hundreds of censored "SFW" pics...

At 6/14/09 07:14 AM, Akkryls wrote:

At 6/14/09 07:06 AM, gregaaron89 wrote: Yeah I can only post stuff like this if I censor it WTF?!!

Wasn't Adam Wan working on some huge "yiffy" movie or something?...

And its okay to post as long as its censored?...

Cue hundreds of censored "SFW" pics...

If this thread gets deleted or locked for having been spammed with "SFW" yiff, I am going to kill you guys.

At 6/14/09 10:30 AM, TheAmateurAnimator wrote:

If this thread gets deleted or locked for having been spammed with "SFW" yiff, I am going to kill you guys.

You could like, start a new one, and be like, the king...

At 6/14/09 11:43 AM, lawlmaster wrote:

At 6/14/09 10:30 AM, TheAmateurAnimator wrote:

If this thread gets deleted or locked for having been spammed with "SFW" yiff, I am going to kill you guys.

You could like, start a new one, and be like, the king...

What, king of SFW yiff?...
May as well kill yourself...

You either have the full thing or nothing...

King of the portal... And then make new yiff-friendly laws...

Perhaps we should go back on topic with more censored images... Or even normal images...

At 6/14/09 12:01 PM, Akkryls wrote: Perhaps we should go back on topic with more censored images... Or even normal images...

I can't be bothered to open up Photoshop and put little black bars on every NSFW picture I'd want to post.

Yes, I'm that lazy.

Here, have an otter.

At 6/14/09 07:14 AM, Akkryls wrote: Wasn't Adam Wan working on some huge "yiffy" movie or something?...

He's been saying that for years, and nothing. Think of it as Duke Nukem Forever.

At 6/14/09 01:06 PM, TheAmateurAnimator wrote: Here, have an otter.

Yes indeed.

At 6/14/09 01:14 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/14/09 01:06 PM, TheAmateurAnimator wrote: Here, have an otter.

Yes indeed.

Have another.

I prefer foxes, especially Champagne. ;3

At 6/14/09 03:50 PM, dino2164 wrote: I prefer foxes, especially Champagne. ;3

Damnit... Someone had to post SexyFur pictures....
*Drools*

At 6/14/09 03:50 PM, dino2164 wrote: I prefer foxes, especially Champagne. ;3

I hope you know when Bernal puts that "Do not redistribute" tag on any image, he means it.

Anyway, have another fox.

At 6/14/09 05:03 PM, Sunglasses wrote:

At 6/14/09 03:50 PM, dino2164 wrote: I prefer foxes, especially Champagne. ;3

I hope you know when Bernal puts that "Do not redistribute" tag on any image, he means it.

Anyway, have another fox.

Yeah... You're going to get sued good...

And I have to post some pictures... To keep up with all these suggestive ones you guys are posting... Its not as suggestive... But its good art...

MICHAEL WESTON FURRY PICS?

burn notice spy guy

PLZ CAN YOU FIND SUM

Be there any undead dragons? not like rotting flesh, but completely bone?Those are cool.

So I want to open a ¥MCA.

get it?

At 6/14/09 09:15 PM, TheReno wrote: So I want to open a ¥MCA.

get it?

I know that character. Question is, who else does?

hey, does anybody remember me?yes, im from the foxes club, and i posted here a very long time ago.

i feel weird for saying this but........is gay porn allowed here?