Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/4/05 03:23 AM, fli wrote: As many of you know, I'm gay.

What the fuck, you're gay? You learn new things about users on the intraweb these days.

At 4/4/05 07:22 AM, TurnipClock wrote: fucking great, all the world needs is another anti-fur pseudo lesbian

Heaven forbid! The Lesbians Against Fur Fun (LAFF) are already the most powerful Congressional lobby in Washington, they don't need any more support.

I am horrendously offended by your predjudice, fli, and find I have no choice but to launch a counter-suit on behalf of FUNK and myself for defamation of character, loss of income, emo distress and corruption of binary code.

I"ll have you served the proper noticed by lunchtime.

At 4/4/05 04:45 AM, fli wrote: Since many animals are not able to comminicate exact words, for all we know, they may feel degraded and humiliated by the vile content. And in turn, cause great and irreversible pshycological harm.

And I SERIOUSLY didn't appreciate the pig and women picture. It is degrading to all hogs everywhere. Hopefuly in the future I can classify furrieism with beastiality and essentially make it illegal to committ, or see. Both in 3D and 2D.

who really gives a rats left testicle about their feelings? if the government/s really cares about animals feeling then why do humans have rights to own them. I dont get off over beastality nor i do i enjoy any of that sort of that shit but i have seen part of the "linda lovelace fucking the dog" video from the 70s and from what i saw the dog seemed extremly happy and not sad/depressed/angry.

the pig and women photo was extremly funny, RIFK

This is all my fault.

:(

i agree with you completly fli but im not exaclty sure what i have to post taht you send of to PETA, could you please tell me exactly as im not sure,
thanks

At 4/4/05 03:26 AM, Seizure_Dog wrote: What about DanMalo? He's been putting doggys in pots and cooking them :O

And making them wear HATS! The shame...

That's what I was thinking >:(

While you're at it, Emperor_Bubba keeps breaking his cats !1

People who take up law suits are only after one thing in the end : MONEY.
I'd like to see the kid's parentls suiing jackson and come out with NOT A PENNY but a prison sentence for jackson. See the look on their faces... that " what the?! ... I wasted my time" look.

At 4/4/05 08:41 AM, Azumi wrote: People who take up law suits are only after one thing in the end : MONEY.
I'd like to see the kid's parentls suiing jackson and come out with NOT A PENNY but a prison sentence for jackson. See the look on their faces... that " what the?! ... I wasted my time" look.

That'd be a high level PAWN

Fli just ask yourself, is this really worth all the trouble of going to court to stop a handful of wierdos?

Secondly, Just how bad is it hurting the animals?

At 4/4/05 08:40 AM, Hoohah wrote:

At 4/4/05 03:26 AM, Seizure_Dog wrote: What about DanMalo? He's been putting doggys in pots and cooking them :O

And making them wear HATS! The shame...

That's what I was thinking >:(

While you're at it, Emperor_Bubba keeps breaking his cats !1

laff @ animal cruelty....

Go get jobs you goddamn hippies.

At 4/4/05 08:59 AM, Revrent wrote: Fli just ask yourself, is this really worth all the trouble of going to court to stop a handful of wierdos?

Secondly, Just how bad is it hurting the animals?

Yes. It is worthwhile to combat the evils of Furrieism.
Now ask yourself this: Wouldn't you assassinate Hitler to prevent the Holocaust?

Cause that's what all this Furrieism is, a big giant holocaust. And the furries are tinty Josef-Mengele's doing nasty experiments on animals at Animal Auschwitz.

Think of the kittens.
Think of the puppies.

People, please. Don't be irresponsible. Think about the people who can't talk for themselves. God bless you all!

How are you a Gay Jehovah's Witness?

At 4/4/05 10:45 AM, fli wrote: Yes. It is worthwhile to combat the evils of Furrieism.
Now ask yourself this: Wouldn't you assassinate Hitler to prevent the Holocaust?

Well... Hitler hadn't really done anything wrong before he tried to conquer Europe and impose his final solution. You would have killed an innocent man. Think of how many future mass murderers and criminals there are right now that haven't grown up yet. If you go around killing them, you're the murderer because they haven't done anything wrong, yet. When they have, then it's a different matter.

And besides, you'd totally wreck causality

Cause that's what all this Furrieism is, a big giant holocaust. And the furries are tinty Josef-Mengele's doing nasty experiments on animals at Animal Auschwitz.

And now It's really obvious that you're taking the piss.

At 4/4/05 11:01 AM, JafitMan wrote: Well... Hitler hadn't really done anything wrong before he tried to conquer Europe and impose his final solution. You would have killed an innocent man. Think of how many future mass murderers and criminals there are right now that haven't grown up yet. If you go around killing them, you're the murderer because they haven't done anything wrong, yet. When they have, then it's a different matter.

Oh well, that's fine and peachy for you...
Hopefully it isn't your mother, sister, grandmother, aunt who gets raped and killed before you're motivated enough to take action. Much worse, the cruelty that an animal feels, but cannot express in words.

Animals are little humans who cannot speak. That's all. And don't they have Constitutional Rights too? They should be able to enjoy life, liberty and persuit happiness.

What? No names?
Folks, I'm on my knees and begging. Instead of this stupid gibberish talk, take action. Put in your name ASAP-- and I will send it to PETA.

Looking Out For Creatures both Great and Small,
Yours truly,
Henry.

At 4/4/05 11:15 AM, fli wrote: Animals are little humans who cannot speak.

Not really, if you think about it they're little animalswho cannot speak. But that's because they don't have the oral, vocal or cranial capasity for it. But then we can't smell what day of the week it is like dogs can, or see through our ears like bats can.

What? No names?

There's no names because you're making NO sense.

I agree that cruelty to animals is bad. And you know people who do it to animals would do it to people if they could. But I don't see how people dressing up as animals to have sex "portrays animals cruelly". When you say 'cruelty' I think you mean neglect and causing pain, Not 'making them look bad'. Newgrounds has a huge collection of satirical flash, that's all about portraying people and things 'cruelly'.

As long as it doesn't harm anyone (and by this I mean PEOPLE) then it's nobodys buisiness what people do with each other.

Point out where I've misunderstood you, or I'll bookmark this thread and hold it as a monument to the galactically stupid.

At 4/4/05 07:29 AM, Ted_Easton wrote: I am horrendously offended by your predjudice, fli, and find I have no choice but to launch a counter-suit on behalf of FUNK and myself for defamation of character, loss of income, emo distress and corruption of binary code.

I"ll have you served the proper noticed by lunchtime.

I know lets start an online petition, we all know how well those work.

At 4/4/05 03:26 AM, Seizure_Dog wrote: What about DanMalo? He's been putting doggys in pots and cooking them :O

And making them wear HATS! The shame...

You leave me OUT of this!

lol real live wolf costumes. I too will unleash my animal within.

At 4/4/05 12:10 PM, DanMalo wrote:

At 4/4/05 03:26 AM, Seizure_Dog wrote: What about DanMalo? He's been putting doggys in pots and cooking them :O

And making them wear HATS! The shame...

You leave me OUT of this!

Yeah, but you could force a lawsuit of libel upon him for associating you with the case. You'll be rich!

At 4/4/05 03:23 AM, fli wrote: I am publicly announcing that I am bringing a lawsuit against a moderator. I have contacted PETA, and I have their financial support and complete help in exchange that I pledge myself to their cause, which I am willing to do.

Your what?

As many you know, FunkBRS came out saying that he is a Furry. At first, I did believe that he was joking around. I’ve been talking to him, off and on, you know—just innocent stuff. This has been off and on, and I thought that he was “curious” about certain “things”. Sexualy. I thought to himself, “I’m gonna help him. It’s gonna be a confusing and difficult time for him until he knows for sure.” As many of you know, I'm gay. And I thought it was my duty to help out Funk to come it, if he was trying.

Your gay? dude your gonna try to straighten him? hes a freakin furry at least hes not gay

Then recently, I’ve been watching a few music videos made from his miniDV camera that he’s been sending to me (he’s a wannabe rock star). But one day he sent me a video of him playing in a skunk costume. I thought nothing about it, but then they became more frequent, a little zany, and one day—there was no music. Just himself in wolf’s costume, or “secondary skin” as Funk disgustingly put in his own terms. Good God! Funk wasn’t a gay man trying to get out of a closet! He was releasing the beast within!

haha thats freakin hilarious. but so what?

Folks, I am disgusted by Funk’s abominable fetish. It portrays animals cruelly, and as sexual objects rather then living beings that all people must respect and love. And so I have joined up PETA who are forming class action suits against websites peddling this kind of smut, some individuals. While I may not have enough things to punish Funk, but I am working hard to make Furrieism a punishable offense. It is a harmful thing against society, humanity, animality.

Your know,heres the arguement with this topic. this is unfair. you cant get in a lawsuit with a guy cause cause he wants to fuck a dog. otherwise i could go up to a mod and get in a lawsuit just cause hes gay. there may be a difference but either way, what is sick to you does not seem sick to him. the same way what is sick to me is not sick to u. in my opinion, simpley my opinion neither right nor wrong, i feel gay people are some of the sickest bastards ever. but im not gonna go out and sue them for it... it also depends what u mean by being a furry. he simpley has an interest in drawn animals or actual beastality are completleyu different. alot of the times having no connection with sexuality...

what if the mod was gay? someone went in a lawsuit. wth? thats crap.

what if the mod was a furry? someone went in a lawsuit. wth? does it make it any better?

what if i was a mod? you went into a lawsuit because im straight. That doesn't make sense either.

And I will watch this through. And if you care about “furries” corrupting kids, please type your name or handle in this post. I will forward this PETA. With your help, we’ll combat the disgusting nature of Furrieism.

this is a joke or your an idiot....just thought i would throw that out there

Oh this is a joke alright. It's worked well too, look how many people have jumped up and expressed their animal tendencies! That's what this is, a trap to get people to come out of the furry closet!

just go here trust me http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=252118

even though i'm entirely convinced this is a joke, if you contacted peta with that information funkbrs house would be firebombed or something.

the entire peta organization is composed of complete nutcases.

You did pick up your mail this morning, fli? The counter-claim has been filed but the court date has yet to be set.

Until then FUNK and I will continue to practise our "alternative lifestyle", thank you very much.

Lawsuit? More like lawlsuit

You won' t win this case. No matter how hard you think you are, you won' t win.

" felching "
definition --- the act of sucking semen from the anus or vagina
example --- I blew my load in my mom's butt, then i felched her, it was pleasant

however, felching is also the term used to desribe the act of inserting small animals into the anus or vagina for sexual gratification.
example --- i was pretty horny, so i jammed my hamster into my cunt, it was a nice felch.

i thought that tidbit of information was best suited to this thread