War on terror

[Neotrance-Ice]

Just wanted to know where evryone stands on this "War".

[dagger-happy]

I'm undecided. Terrorism is definitely a tangible danger nowadays. Should we invade Iraq though? What do others think?

[Neotrance-Ice]

At 3/7/02 04:54 PM, dagger_happy wrote: I'm undecided. Terrorism is definitely a tangible danger nowadays. Should we invade Iraq though? What do others think?

Absolutly not. Our military is spread way to far. Plus Iraq has the worlds third largest army. We would win, but it would leave us open to other aggresive countries like N. Korea or China

[L00N]

At 3/7/02 12:25 AM, Neotrance_Ice wrote: Just wanted to know where evryone stands on this "War".

Kill 'em all let god sort 'em out!

[Slizor]

Totally injust.

[Piro-O-Nero]

At 3/8/02 02:40 AM, Neotrance_Ice wrote:

At 3/7/02 04:54 PM, dagger_happy wrote: I'm undecided. Terrorism is definitely a tangible danger nowadays. Should we invade Iraq though? What do others think?

Absolutly not. Our military is spread way to far. Plus Iraq has the worlds third largest army. We would win, but it would leave us open to other aggresive countries like N. Korea or China

That's a stupid comment to make. Do you honestly think China or North Korea would dare attack us? And why would they want to in the first place? This isn't a fuckin video game.

And trust me, they are not the aggressive nations of this world. We are. And I think it's totally ok to admit that. It is because of that aggression that we are the mighty nation we are today.

We attack and they defend poorly.

[Commander-K25]

At 3/18/02 08:07 PM, Piro-O-Nero wrote:

At 3/8/02 02:40 AM, Neotrance_Ice wrote:

At 3/7/02 04:54 PM, dagger_happy wrote: I'm undecided. Terrorism is definitely a tangible danger nowadays. Should we invade Iraq though? What do others think?

Absolutly not. Our military is spread way to far. Plus Iraq has the worlds third largest army. We would win, but it would leave us open to other aggresive countries like N. Korea or China

That's a stupid comment to make. Do you honestly think China or North Korea would dare attack us? And why would they want to in the first place? This isn't a fuckin video game.

And trust me, they are not the aggressive nations of this world. We are. And I think it's totally ok to admit that. It is because of that aggression that we are the mighty nation we are today.

We attack and they defend poorly.

Iraq has a large army but this same thing was discussed at the start of the Gulf War. Most of their army are conscript soldiers who were more than happy to surrender to us. They defected in massive number in the Gulf War. A group of soldiers even surrendered to Italian journalists just to get out of their bunker and get away. They don't want to fight, the government forces them. The loyal troops were the "Republican Guard" with a few tens of thousand of troops. They were loyal but their small arms fire and light tanks were no match for stealth bombers, cruise missles, nightvision, Abrams tanks and other such technology and methods.

As for North Korea and China, they'd love to but they wouldn't dare. They never have, even to invade Taiwan.

[Piro-O-Nero]

At 3/18/02 09:42 PM, Commander-K25 wrote:

At 3/18/02 08:07 PM, Piro-O-Nero wrote:

At 3/8/02 02:40 AM, Neotrance_Ice wrote:

At 3/7/02 04:54 PM, dagger_happy wrote: I'm undecided. Terrorism is definitely a tangible danger nowadays. Should we invade Iraq though? What do others think?

Absolutly not. Our military is spread way to far. Plus Iraq has the worlds third largest army. We would win, but it would leave us open to other aggresive countries like N. Korea or China

That's a stupid comment to make. Do you honestly think China or North Korea would dare attack us? And why would they want to in the first place? This isn't a fuckin video game.

And trust me, they are not the aggressive nations of this world. We are. And I think it's totally ok to admit that. It is because of that aggression that we are the mighty nation we are today.

We attack and they defend poorly.

Iraq has a large army but this same thing was discussed at the start of the Gulf War. Most of their army are conscript soldiers who were more than happy to surrender to us. They defected in massive number in the Gulf War. A group of soldiers even surrendered to Italian journalists just to get out of their bunker and get away. They don't want to fight, the government forces them. The loyal troops were the "Republican Guard" with a few tens of thousand of troops. They were loyal but their small arms fire and light tanks were no match for stealth bombers, cruise missles, nightvision, Abrams tanks and other such technology and methods.

As for North Korea and China, they'd love to but they wouldn't dare. They never have, even to invade Taiwan.

Why would North Korea and China love to attack us?

[implodinggoat]

At 3/18/02 09:52 PM, Piro-O-Nero wrote: Why would North Korea and China love to attack us?

North Korea and China would like to see us as communist states as much as we would like to see them be democratic nations. But neither could actually beat us in a war and N. Korea wouldn't last a weekend.

Basically if we did attack Iraq our military being spread thin wouldn't really be a problem because nobody is crazy enough to attack us.

My opinion is that we need to legalize political assasinations and snipe that bitch Sadam.

[implodinggoat]

We should declare war on Iraq and remove that fascist Sadam, but first we need an excuse.

So I say we send in all our weapons inspectors and act really stuborn and if Iraq doesn't do exactly what we want we say that we are worried about them developing biological or nuclear weapons and then cruise in and waste that bitch Sadam.