Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

You fucking bastard, I've never seen a wild polar bear, they're to dangerous. Canadians are a tougher breed than you you backwards ass motherfucker, remember, we burtn down your white house TWICE!, you tried invading us TWICE ad you lost both times, its asshole licking cocksucking assholes like you that fuel my hatred for your fucked up country, asshole.

WoW, you really make a case for the idea that canadiens are peaceful, well educated people. I don't think you'd ever want to see what would happen if the U.S. had a mind to invade you guys now eh?
Good one Jackass

you'd collapse without us too, you need us, if we cut off out power half of America would be in the dark, you'd better be thankful for what we do for you you peice o' shit, you never apreaciate something until it's gone.

Your going?! Awesome

At 3/14/05 07:39 PM, night_watch_man18 wrote:

At 3/14/05 04:22 PM, metalhead676 wrote: i love my country, if any country sucks america does "land of the free' yeah just don't be born black or muslim.

Honestly Metal... I swear... Canada weeps when you open your mouth sometimes.

Quoted for great re-readability

Say metal, calm down. One day you'll grow up and realize every thread here about canada vs america is a big ball of yarn.

And when annual nominations for "best n00b trap thread" roll around, this'll probably be at the top.

Chill out, eh?

At 3/17/05 01:56 PM, i-hope-you-die wrote: And when annual nominations for "best n00b trap thread" roll around, this'll probably be at the top.

The OBT so beats this in the n00b-trap category, even though angry Canadians are funny. ^^

It's true, we are posting this on newgrounds and all of this is completely meaningless. I enjoy getting a rise out of you canuks. I really don't care all that much

U.S.A! U.S.A!

Funny and I taught the US and Canada were buddies.... I mean really you share a border... Come on...
And if (God forbid) like some idiots suggested much earlier the USA invade Canada... not only would France be deeply displeased but the US would lose it's most important ally...
The UK, Canada is part of our commonwealth so we would also have to take military action.
So the last thing the US needs is to lose its greatest ally especially at this time of crisis

At 3/17/05 01:52 PM, Mcdubs wrote: WoW, you really make a case for the idea that canadiens are peaceful, well educated people. I don't think you'd ever want to see what would happen if the U.S. had a mind to invade you guys now eh?
Good one Jackass

you wouldn't want to see it either, other countries would nuke Americas ass for doing that, and hicks like you would be gone forever.

At 3/16/05 07:18 PM, bcdemon wrote: In comparison, Norway ranks #1 with 92% of its GDP to foreign aid.

second...best..typo...ever

At 3/16/05 05:37 PM, Mcdubs wrote:

At 3/15/05 02:32 PM, SpiceLord wrote: I meant toatal foreign aid.

You have no idea what you are talking about, when you add in the cost of our military which is supplying the people with food and shelter and protection, the
Billions of dollars in private donations, and the hundreds of millions of dollars in government aid, it makes canada's donation seem just like canada, a joke.

I think I will reply to this comment, my major is International Dvelopmental Studies so I have done research on foriegn aid. The US in terms of percentage of GDP is last amonth the top industrialized countries in terms of foriegn aid. The State Department and the DoD have stated that US military forces in areas the UN are working are not counted as part of assitance to UN Peacekeeping contributions since they ahve their own objectives. I really would like mor einformation on where in the world the US military is providing large scale aid or shelter. Billions in private donations have NOTHING to do with your government. Untill only a few years ago the US was not even the worlds largest donor in dollar terms, it was Japan, but they scaled back.

And a side note, the top three recpieants of US foriegn aid are Egypt, Isreal and Russia in that order, each recieving over $800 million. People make foriegn aid seem to be a great indicator of how nice a country is to the world, when its really not. Aid is all find and dandy, but they don't give it out to be nice. The top two reasons for giving aid, premote foriegn policy and boost the donor countries industries (many aid packages have conditions such as you must sign this agreement or buy the food from said company or use said contractor).

At 3/17/05 01:49 PM, Mcdubs wrote: First of all, the military's cost is NOT included in our aid pledge.

16,000 U.S. military personnel...two dozen U.S. ships....and over 100 aircraft were dedicated to the disaster relief effort at an estimated cost of some $5 million a day. Those costs are part of the $346 million the U.S. spent for immediate relief.

But aside from that, How many aircraft carriers and heavy lift helicopters does your dart team have, how many troops were included? How much food is being delivered through them?
Thats what I thought.

Our DART team has no aircraft carriers or heavy lift helicopters, what is your point? 200 members of the DART team went to Sri Lanka, again, what is your point? How much food is being delivered, , I have no clue, do you?

Also, comparing GDPs are completely irrellevant. how much help does norways 92% (no source?) equal. It is bulk money that counts, not percents. If I make 500$ a week, and donate all five hundred, that is a 100% GDP donation. If I make 100000$ and give 1% then 1000$ goes to charity. Which will help more?

Actually, the GDP is totally relevent. You don't expect a country like Norway with a GDP of $270 billion to match dollars and cents contributions with the USA and a GDP of $11 trillion do you? Cuz that would be completely stupid. 92% of Norways GDP
is $2.5 billion.

Considering your lil math example is extremely flawed, use mine.

If you make $500 a week and give 1% to charity, your left with $495 to feed and clothe yourself and pay your bills.

If you make $500 a week and give 50% to charity, your left with $50 to feed and clothe yourself and pay your bills.

Now, which amount leaves YOU with enough money to take care of YOURSELF?
Thats how they (countries) go about figuring out how much foreign aid they can give. They figure out how much they need for themselves first (which is only sensible) and then figure out how much can be afforded to foreign aid.

Your logic would have Norway give up 5% of its GDP to foreign aid just to keep pace with USA .14%.

At 3/17/05 03:45 PM, Archduke_Ferdinand wrote:

At 3/16/05 07:18 PM, bcdemon wrote: In comparison, Norway ranks #1 with 92% of its GDP to foreign aid.

second...best..typo...ever

ROFL damn, thanx
correction:

Norway contributes .92% of its GDP to foreign aid.
Not 92%

you wouldn't want to see it either, other countries would nuke Americas ass for doing that, and hicks like you would be gone forever.

no one would do anything, because canada sux.

SERIOUSLY

At 3/17/05 03:39 PM, metalhead676 wrote:

you wouldn't want to see it either, other countries would nuke Americas ass for doing that, and hicks like you would be gone forever.

:my hick ass has finished his undergrad in mech eng. finished his masters in FPE, and is working on his PHD. In five years, and all on scholarship. Eat shit and die.

At 3/17/05 02:41 PM, LordGoulden wrote: Funny and I taught the US and Canada were buddies.... I mean really you share a border... Come on...
And if (God forbid) like some idiots suggested much earlier the USA invade Canada... not only would France be deeply displeased but the US would lose it's most important ally...

I was simply responding to metals claim that canada had burned down two of our whitehouses. For real, be serious please!? which is going to win??
No one likes to be second/third/fourth place, but someone must fill these spots, and it's not america. Biatches

At 3/17/05 04:08 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote:

At 3/16/05 05:37 PM, Mcdubs wrote:

At 3/15/05 02:32 PM, SpiceLord wrote: I meant toatal foreign aid.

You have no idea what you are talking about, when you add in the cost of our military which is supplying the people with food and shelter and protection, the
Billions of dollars in private donations, and the hundreds of millions of dollars in government aid, it makes canada's donation seem just like canada, a joke.

I think I will reply to this comment, my major is International Dvelopmental Studies so I have done research on foriegn aid.

I think i will reply to this comment, as your major is useless, and has no impact on the "REAL WORLD".

The US in terms of percentage of GDP is last amonth the top industrialized countries in terms of foriegn aid. The State Department and the DoD have stated that US military forces in areas the UN are working are not counted as part of assitance to UN Peacekeeping contributions since they ahve their own objectives.

FYI you god damn ignorant motherf*cker.

To run a nuclear powered acc(aircraftcarrier), it takes over10,000,000$ a day including fuel, personnel, resources, and weaponry.
Do the research dumbass...

Also. helocopters require fuel, personnel, and armerments.

I know it is hard to admit that your country is a failure compared to ours, but that is part of life. After we protected you from the Nazis, communists, facists, and "the green party". You insult us. You suck, you've always sucked, and will continue to suck....

Not to mention it, but 85% of the U.N. funds come from the U.S. but we get no say on the action on where they go.

I agree that the U.N. has done a great job of confirming that their useless, and corrupt contributions have attributed to over 1 million deaths throughout the globe. Truely the most useless and irrellivent organization in the last 50 years is th U.N.
You bitch like 50 year old women.

but it don't matter. in 15 years, we will all salute the same flag.

FAGG

Demon, I'm glad that you've realized that you suck, Please follow your "quote"!!!

Your logic would have Norway give up 5% of its GDP to foreign aid just to keep pace with USA .14%.

actually, its around Norway's five to our .05% but nevermind that inconvenience...

thank you!!! even though you have still ignored the "private donations" that america gives, you have finally come to the conclusion that no matter what dipshit useless percentage norway, or any other irrelevent country gives, it will never come close to that of the U.S.

We are the boldest, best, most generous country in the world. And will be for a long time. Please, while you are orgasming over your false sources and bullshit math, go fuck yourself...

Please, go die somewhere.
and don't ask us for help for once when your bitch asses need help again.

Seriously

Your logic would have Norway give up 5% of its GDP to foreign aid just to keep pace with USA .14%.

again, you suck, you can't even get your sig figs right idiot. Please, go to hell. Again, You suck your country sux, and that explains why bush is over there giving your leaders the deal. Please....Bitches..

At 3/17/05 04:21 PM, bcdemon wrote:

At 3/17/05 01:49 PM, Mcdubs wrote: First of all, the military's cost is NOT included in our aid pledge.

16,000 U.S. military personnel...two dozen U.S. ships....and over 100 aircraft were dedicated to the disaster relief effort at an estimated cost of some $5 million a day. Those costs are part of the $346 million the U.S. spent for immediate relief.

Great soucce dumbass, but fuel costs alone= 7-10 mil A DAY for a fully loaded, stocked, and armed aircraft carrier. Depending on the source, two to four of these were deployed for aid. Not including food for our soldiers, gas for our planes, money for all the bullshit safety requirements that the U.N. puts on our fleet. Please, you can't compete. Stop trying.

again, this is included in our budget for helping the developing world. Your backbone is our contingency. God damn.

Did you just post 7 times in a row?

Sorry McTardboy, but private donations don't count when talking gov foreign aid.

And I can't argue with you if you're going to dispute the facts laid out in front of you with your silly opinions.
It was a great source wasn't it, it showed you have absolutely no fukin clue as to what your talkin about.

Oh I almost forgot, who the fuck are you to talk about a million lives lost around the globe. Your country has erased more lives than that in just 1 country with your sanctions and wars.

Mcdubs = poster child for a "edit" button.

im from canada and we hate america cause most of them are rednex and hillbillies

most

At 3/17/05 10:11 PM, -LazyDrunk- wrote: Did you just post 7 times in a row?

He lost count, one of his cousins walked by.

Bc, unless you irish and drunk. fuck the fuck off. fucking man shit.

$3.036 billion in assistance to countries supporting the economic and political foreign policy concerns of the United States. Major recipients of this aid include Egypt, Israel, Jordan, West Bank and Gaza and front-line states in the war on terrorism, including Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Philippines. Funding is also requested for Iraq. That is straight from the USAID website.

The DoD and State Department say that indirect contributions shouldnt be calculated because they serve the US's own interests. Page 6 This is a report from the General Accounting Office, a gov't branch.

The United States currently pays 22 percent of the U.N.'s budget. That is no where near the 85% you claim the US pays. Please provide a reliable source for you stat.

The US actually has a major say in where UN Peacekeeprs go, since they have a veto on the UN Security Council. The US also has a vote in the General assembly, just like every other country. But they have a permanent seat on the Security Council and a permanent veto vote.

I don't really see how you can say that the US protected Canada from the Nazis. As I recall you joined at the end of the war, it had been going for several years before you joined in, and that was because of Pearl Harbour. The communists never threatend Canada, the communists were nto as bad as the gov't made them out to be. Facism never threatend Canada and it still exsists in the world today.

Im not really sure how two aircraft carrier groups count as foriegn aid. I mean all they really do is fight, and foriegn aid is supposed to help build shit and start programs.

The US did at one point along with all the industrialized countries pledged to reach atleast 0.7% donation to foriegn aid, and ONLY the Scandinavian countries did.

Canada has actually only completely burned down 1 White House as far as I know.

One of the reasons the UN has problems doing Peacekeeping is because the US holds up shit in the Security Council. Plus the UN has a very small budget which is not helped by the fact the US doesnt pay its dues on-time, and I think still owes money.

Oh and on the point that my degree is worthless in the "real world", people with degrees like yours will work for people with degrees like mine in developmental projects. You probally don't even know what a degree in INternational Developmental Studies is. It covers economics, politics, history, sociology, anthropology, globalization, business, and development theories. This semester I have micro and macro economics, political studies, international development (focusing on the Thailand boom and bust right now). When I graduate I can work in many differewnt fields anywhere int he world.

I do not claim to knwo anything about mech eng, so unless you actually know something or can do some half decent researcha botu politics, foriegn policy, FA and ODA or globalization, don't come here and talk trash.

America is full of ignorant arrogant assholes, Who think they are the world police and can get into anyones buisness. All for the 'American cause' what American cause?
to spread freedom and democracy around the world? Yea fucking right, I don't see bombing countries with cruise missiles, and overthrowing governments spreading freedom and democracy.
Canada, Like the rest of the World, Hates America for those things. The American flag can go burn in hell.

At 3/7/05 06:49 PM, Maus wrote: BC, did you make a living wage on top of tips, or did you live off of the tips? Here in the US, servers live off their tips, and are paid less than $2/hour.

I paying someone $2/h legal? (serious question)

Minimum wage laws are different for host/hostess, bartenders/barmaids, waiter and waitresses. They get paid a small base wage, lower than the minimum wage, and then tips on top of that. However if they do not make enough to reach the actual minimum wage from their tips then the employer has to pay full minimum wage.

At 3/12/05 07:42 PM, airraid81 wrote: If you use it right, then there's nothing wrong with it, but way too many people call their friends during school and talk for hours on them. They have way too many features today. Why would you text message someone instead of calling them?

No one buys a Cell now because they want to make phone calls, They buy them for the endless string of features so they can go up to their friends and show of the billions of features their phones have.

At 3/13/05 12:15 PM, airraid81 wrote:

At 3/13/05 12:05 PM, night_watch_man18 wrote:

LOL!! Alright Kid, I guess those are 'plausable' reasons to need to be in constant contact with the world. I just know that I'll be sitting back laughin it up when all you kiddies develop a brain tumor by my age =)

I'm on my phone for less than a minute everyday after track practace to call my mom to pick me up. That won't give me a brain tumor. I guess it would make more sense to you if I stayed at school all night.

Kind of makes you wonder what your parents did when their were no cell phones. They must have camped out til the next day when they could take the bus home. Its so primative to think they didn't have cell phones back then, how could they live!?!?!

At 3/18/05 11:36 PM, snail_262001 wrote:

At 3/12/05 07:42 PM, airraid81 wrote: If you use it right, then there's nothing wrong with it, but way too many people call their friends during school and talk for hours on them. They have way too many features today. Why would you text message someone instead of calling them?

There are a lot of reasons why to text message people. Its faster than calling them, depending on your plan its cheaper if not just as cheap to text them. A lot of the phones I work on are used a lot for text messages when either the mic or the earphone is messed up. Also, if you have an intermitent signal, it only takes a few seconds to send and recieve so it doesn't matter if you have a crappy signal or not, just that you have one. Not sure, but roaming charges probally don't apply either to it, or its a lot less since you are using the other people's towers for a couple seconds as opposed to a few minutes.

I do agree though, many of the features are getting rediculous, camera phones are a great way to turn your woman into a voyer though. You have no idea how many phones I work on a month that are full of home made porn. That and its good for insurance purposes as well for accidents and such if a normal camera isn't available.

Sorry for the rant.

No one buys a Cell now because they want to make phone calls, They buy them for the endless string of features so they can go up to their friends and show of the billions of features their phones have.

Sorry snail piggybacking this as a response to airraid81 too lazy to find his original post.