At 2/22/05 07:42 PM, WadeFulp wrote: If we make the switch we can always put up a temporary notice that visitors should set their screen res to 1024x768 or higher to properly view the site.
That would be a good idea.
nooo, i got 1024, and it looks aswome, keep it 1024!!!!!
i sdont use high reslolution. my monitor dicked me over wheni got it. itws smaller. iahd a huge on e so now i got this shit. fuck!
I've used 800X600 forever. I will have to scroll around more to stuff but I guess I will be fine with the change.
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote:
If we are going to consider expanding to 1024, I want to be sure we aren't screwing over a lot of people.
ive always used 1024.
Yeah, I have a 17" Dell with 1024 by 768 resolution, and the site works fine. And to all people who use a resolution less than 1024 by 768 but can switch to 1024 by 768, you should switch. Everything looks alot better. All you have to do is right click, left click properties, go to settings, and drag the resolution bar.
i use...hold on...1024x768. i feel it is the most comfortable.
At 2/23/05 04:16 PM, JesZ wrote: you´r are not the only one, tom..
i use 800x600x32 when i play Duke Nukem 3D and other games =D
How can your monitor have 3 dimensions? 800 pixels wide, by 600 pixels high and 32 pixels deep is impossible with a montior. Isn't it?
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: Quick question: Does anyone out there have a screen resolution LESS THAN 1024x768? For example, 800x600 or 640x480? If so, please respond to this thread so I can get a feel.
I have 1280x1024 currently. You should make a poll, that could possibly be more effective.
Mr. C (Since June 7th, 2001)
i got a 800/600 and it would kind of suck if you changed it
I use 1280x1024. My screen's 17 inches.
Hope that helps the poll. I support this idea all the way.
At 2/22/05 07:45 PM, WadeFulp wrote: BTW, I use 1600x1200 on my laptop and NG only takes up 50% of my screen's width. There is an extra 400 pixels on either side for giant porn skyscraper ads. :P j/k
hahaah, pwnt ^____^
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: IGN.COM is 1024 and one of the top 200 sites on the web
Where did you get this statistic, is there a list?
You could really go for a chocolate chip cookie right about now...
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: Quick question:
If we are going to consider expanding to 1024, I want to be sure we aren't screwing over a lot of people.
1024 is alright. Most of the members got 1024 or more so if you got a good reason to use 1024 just use it. I think it's ok with 860 cuz you can see a bit of the other things running, but update to 1024 if you need to.
I am just curious... What are you going to do with the new space?
/Mathias Andersson
Culture is to society as cancer is to the body. We need structure, dicipline and no more relaxation.
No more gentle shit, pain is the fundation of a solid nation.
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: Quick question: Does anyone out there have a screen resolution LESS THAN 1024x768? For example, 800x600 or 640x480? If so, please respond to this thread so I can get a feel.
800x600 here! Need upgrade soon...
i have 1024 at home, but at school we have 800x600, but the school comps are crap (32mb ram,...)
BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER
BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER
BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER
At 2/23/05 07:41 PM, EarthCrisis wrote:At 2/23/05 04:16 PM, JesZ wrote: you´r are not the only one, tom..How can your monitor have 3 dimensions? 800 pixels wide, by 600 pixels high and 32 pixels deep is impossible with a montior. Isn't it?
i use 800x600x32 when i play Duke Nukem 3D and other games =D
I think he means the screen resolution is at 800 x 600 and the color quality is 32-bit. Hence, 800x600x32.
I would assume most people are using the 32-bit (or highest or "millions of colors") setting?
At 2/24/05 09:21 AM, Freakapotimus wrote: I would assume most people are using the 32-bit (or highest or "millions of colors") setting?
I hope so... I truly feel bad for anyone who has to see this site in 256 colors.
"A witty quote proves nothing."
~Voltaire
At 2/24/05 10:23 AM, Freakapotimus wrote: Designer are not limited to just the web-safe color palette anymore.
I wish I had a web-safe cavy.
px hulk.
At 2/22/05 07:49 PM, Star_Cleaver wrote: I use 1024, there won't be any complaining here. I actually like the idea because then users might not shy away from making flash files with large resolutions.
it pisses me off when i try to play games and the resoulution is bigger than the screen...
I'm on 1024, btw
At 2/24/05 10:55 AM, Incredible_Hulk wrote: I wish I had a web-safe cavy.
Everyone should see little Gregory's cuteness!
I'm using the 1024 x 768 resolution setting for my display, so I'm in no harm during the switchover.
Status: MIA
Next Release ETA: ?
Either 1024x768 or 1152x864.
Anything bigger than that hurts my eyes.. (the width of this moniter's viewing screen is only 13")
I use a 1152x864 Res. on a 21" mon
But view NG and others through a browser window set open to about 900x400. Would go to a larger viewable area If I had to. Though it is handy to keep the window as small as I can.
