BackDoor- Door 1
You find yourself in a strange house with only a man on the phone as a guide.
4.08 / 5.00 28,263 ViewsMini Commando
Action adventure game with nazi enemies in the second world war.
3.89 / 5.00 24,636 Viewsim on 800x600....
i got an old 15" CRT monitor. hopefully that should change in a few months, though.
I use 1600x1200, yes, I'm rich, I'm powerful, I'm a Microsoft intern.
Tom! Don't screw me! i use 800x600! Noooo!
I don't understand how so many people can use 800x640?!
it's too cramped and makes me feel like a retard when im using it, if people have trouble reading text at a higher resolution they can increase the text size with the browser it's not hard :/
You can also increase the size of the icons and text in Windows.
I use 1280x960 on my both my monitors (omg i have 2 :o) and if im working i whack the first one up to 1600x1200 as it gives me more space to work with \o/
Well, I have to keep it at 800 because I find it difficult to read otherwise.
But, if the majority of people want it, what can ya do?
[Oh yeah, I can't log into my account].
I'm sure you won't screw alot of people and if so its their fault
Sandwiches are very tasty!
800x600, I hope NG doesn't switch to a really wide layout, I hate those. I like NG the way it is. :'(
I use 1024 *Is that the 1)> Its good. Alot of space and not confining like that 800. For you people who need to read the font, get some glasses.
LOAD 'EM UP TOM!!!!!!
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: Quick question: Does anyone out there have a screen resolution LESS THAN 1024x768? For example, 800x600 or 640x480? If so, please respond to this thread so I can get a feel.
Supposedly, 20% of web surfers still use resolutions less than 1024. I'm just not sure if any of them are Newgrounds visitors! IGN.COM is 1024 and one of the top 200 sites on the web, so I'm assuming it hasn't been a problem for them.
If we are going to consider expanding to 1024, I want to be sure we aren't screwing over a lot of people.
Just expand to 1024 x 768. Anyone still on a res less than 800x600 NEED to upgrade their monitor or something. I use 1280 x 1024 and its still too big for me!
Well, I guess I'm not going to have problems.
I use 1280*1024.
I quess I've got 800x600... But I'm really not sure. I think changing it is you're decision though.
1280x1024.
All you fools who still run anything less than 1024x768; upgrade or stop using computers, your dragging down the nett IQ of NG users.
Yes I use 800x600 resolution. Anything higher and everything looks horrible for me no matter how much I mess with my settings. I should just face the cold hard facts that I need a new comp BADLY.
switched to 1024x768 a few weeks ago.
Its way better that way.
If we are going to consider expanding to 1024, I want to be sure we aren't screwing over a lot of people.
******************************************************
Im using 1024 X 768
Im pretty sure it wont matter much if you use the width and height tags with % instead of just absolute values
I have 1024.
When are you planning on changing the resolution?
At 2/23/05 06:04 AM, DookeyFace wrote: 1280x1024.
All you fools who still run anything less than 1024x768; upgrade or stop using computers, your dragging down the nett IQ of NG users.
I think you fail to realise that some people might prefer it. I find it difficult to read if it's too small and I happen to like Newgrounds this chunky.
But I won't stop coming here if you did, so it's really up to you, Tom.
[PM me with Review/BBS/Chat abuse. Or not. It's up to you, really.] :: [Pre 2007 redesign level calculator]
"Simple isn't when you O.O.D. principles."
Honestly, I only use 1152 x 864 because i dont want it so blurry and huge on my desktop since its already cluttered...
At 2/22/05 08:08 PM, Mr_Fluffykins wrote:At 2/22/05 08:04 PM, UGuardian wrote: Here's poll results from a very popular website (Neopets):Neo pets is more of a childrens site, so the people going their most likely aren't the majority of people going here
Half of the people I know that play Neopets are 35 years old or older, so ya never now. Also, there are several Neopets players on NG.
And I also included stats from the World Wide Web Consortium, which say 800x640 or less is still used by about 40% of the world, which is enough reason for sticking with 800x640 in my opinion.
I use 1024 X 768 and always have. I think this is a very good idea, keeping up with the technology. The people out there who have resolutions that are less need to keep up.
At 2/22/05 08:43 PM, Kasualty wrote: How do you know what the top 200 sites are??
i use:
1152 x 864
just right! 1024 x 768 is so damn huge! i think that you can change the resolution, 800 x 600 is turning in to what 640 x 480 is = fuck that (in most cases).
when i'm building a web page i have to work with 1024 itherwise my page will be so damn huge, but with 1024 you have to scroll to get to all the tools and see everything...what about flash with 1024 *shivers*
1024X768 would look much better then 800X600.
At 2/23/05 05:46 AM, alexsmolik wrote: Well, I guess I'm not going to have problems.
I use 1280*1024.
wow, i just 2 changed to 1280X1024, had to ajust my monitor settings, now it looks ok. still have to get used to it. if i get headaches i know i have to change back, but it looks like a good res to me.
wow! in flash everything is even easyer to oversee now. but i still have the idea the letter are still a tiny bit blury to me.
At 2/22/05 07:42 PM, WadeFulp wrote: If we make the switch we can always put up a temporary notice that visitors should set their screen res to 1024x768 or higher to properly view the site.
I think a better plan of action would be to use style sheets to layout and design the site, but I've been saying that to you guys for years. This time, though, I'm going to add that you can let the users choose the width of the site that's best for them by having multiple CSS files and having an option for "theme" or "site width" in the grounds gold menu. You can have various styles, like "750px wide", "975px wide", or "relative %-based width".
FWIW, my screen res at work is 1600*1200 on a 19" monitor. I think it's higher than that at home since I have a 21" monitor.
Quote of the day: @Nysssa "What is the word I want to use here?" @freakapotimus "Taint".
1024x768 here. Why do some of you feel the need to act like god because you can read font smaller than a pinhead on a screen larger than New York City. Screen size is simply preference and what you are used to... not a symbol of your coolness. Stop acting like little children please.
Oh and very good idea Freak.
At 2/22/05 07:39 PM, TomFulp wrote: Quick question: Does anyone out there have a screen resolution LESS THAN 1024x768? For example, 800x600 or 640x480? If so, please respond to this thread so I can get a feel.
yup. my laptop
http://www.interstellarmarines.com/
the best AAA Indie game in the making, help the game by spreading the word! ;D
I did not draw the signature picture
i use 1024, anyone whos moniter is >=15 inches should use at least 1024 too.
I still use a Windows ME with a resolution of 800x600, so yea..but hey it doesn't matter. i just got a new laptop.
BOO-YEH!!