Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/12/06 02:41 PM, SirSalt wrote: Well, My fruits, I would like an opinion on my new signature.

Yar! It be a fine piece of art, and no mistake!

At 10/13/06 05:14 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 10/12/06 02:41 PM, SirSalt wrote: Well, My fruits, I would like an opinion on my new signature.

Yar! It be a fine piece of art, and no mistake!

Oh!
Sorry there coop I almost mistook you for a pirate. Deary me! Ghastly People I say.

Well one must thankyou for your lovely verdict, One could find my other sigs by clicking my signature

Well one must excuse me for my double post but I am highly confused!

My signature has been rated 1/10 by madknt and I am shocked and appalled at his decision.

The Cad!

At 10/13/06 11:47 AM, SirSalt wrote: My signature has been rated 1/10 by madknt and I am shocked and appalled at his decision.

The Cad!

Ignore him. Whilst he's a good sig maker, he's bases everything agaisnt his own work I'm guessing, which automatically means that if it looks worse than what he can do it is crap.

I fail to see his point about the pic being stretched though. It doesn't look that way to me really.

It's not a brilliant sig in my opinion, but It's worth more than a one.

4 maybe 5 out of 10 from the Birmingham judge.

Ignore him. Whilst he's a good sig maker, he's bases everything agaisnt his own work I'm guessing, which automatically means that if it looks worse than what he can do it is crap.

Thanks, You're always here for me to calm me down and rate my sigs :)

At 10/12/06 08:37 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 10/12/06 08:27 AM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote:

I swear I had a couple of faggots with my Morrison's topside of beef sunday lunch...

I'm not sure they do beef faggots, because the ones I eat are either pork or lamb. You may well have had dumplings, which are similar, but not the same at all.

They weren't beef faggots, but they were with the dinner alongside the wafer-thin beef. And I know they weren't dumplings. Or at least not made of suet/flour. Can you get other kinds of dumplings? Aside from adding herbs?

At 10/13/06 12:29 PM, SirSalt wrote: Thanks, You're always here for me to calm me down and rate my sigs :)

No problem old boy. I'm happy to help.

Now then, how is everyone on this somewhat dull day?

Personally, one is weeping over the amount of homework one has to do this weekend. < sigh> And to top it all off I didn't ge the job I was interviewed for so not only am I knee deep in work, I'm broke as well...

Well on my way back from school. I verntured into the virgin shop to purchace oneself a cd. I got quite carried away and bought three;
A classic-Best Of Blur.
A bit o' fat boy-Why Try Harder.
And Lilly Allen-Alright. Still.

Im gathering a nice collection of albums now ^_^

At 10/13/06 04:50 PM, SirSalt wrote: And Lilly Allen-Alright. Still.

Youa ctually like that chavvified wench? Well each to his own I suppose. Personally I find ehr annoiyng. You can not sing songs about beating up grannies aand make it sound happy. It just isn't natural :-(

Im gathering a nice collection of albums now ^_^

Good on you old boy. Ones colelction is quite large, Soemthing like 50 odd albums now. Almsot all of whcih ia ctually bought which surprised me. i'd have though i'd have had more < cough> Pirated < cough> cd's but apparently I don't.

TNT, I challenge you to tell me how, according to basic science, kangaroos don't exist.

You had that in your sig, I just had to ask.

At 10/14/06 02:14 PM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote: TNT, I challenge you to tell me how, according to basic science, kangaroos don't exist.

You had that in your sig, I just had to ask.

the amount of energy per day used by a kangaroo when it hops about is less than the energy it consumes whislt eating.

Therefore, if it isn't getting enough energy, it can not move, if it can not move it can not search for food, if it can't search for food, it can not eat, if it can not eat it dies, therefore using basic science all kangaroos should be dead and therfore they do nto exist!

God Bless Pratchett!

At 10/14/06 03:00 PM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote:: the amount of energy per day used by a kangaroo when it hops about is less than the energy it consumes whislt eating.

Therefore, if it isn't getting enough energy, it can not move, if it can not move it can not search for food, if it can't search for food, it can not eat, if it can not eat it dies, therefore using basic science all kangaroos should be dead and therfore they do nto exist!

God Bless Pratchett!

Pratchett eh?

However I can counter your argument with empirical philosophy. Whe know of kangaroos. Therefore, we have, in our minds, an understanding of what that could be. Therefore, there has to exist in our brains a combination of connections, electrical pulses, and chemicals a set of facts and interrelations that form that knowledge. As a series of magnetic alignments or physical pits and/or electrical charges form the existance of a character in the game world, there has to be kangaroos in existance in the mental realm.

You yourself came up with the reasoning behind why a kangaroo would survive. Therefore that doomed specie must exist in your brain for you to know that it was doomed. If it did not exist in your brain, you would not know what this doomed specie is. Therfore, I can say for certainty that Unicorns, vampires, aliens, magic, and God all exist. Along with that imaginary friend of yours, Mr Pratchett.

At 10/14/06 09:16 PM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote: However I can counter your argument with empirical philosophy. Whe know of kangaroos. Therefore, we have, in our minds, an understanding of what that could be. Therefore, there has to exist in our brains a combination of connections, electrical pulses, and chemicals a set of facts and interrelations that form that knowledge. As a series of magnetic alignments or physical pits and/or electrical charges form the existance of a character in the game world, there has to be kangaroos in existance in the mental realm.

Or you could just say that Kangaroos store up energy in there legs, as they act like springs, therefore reducing the amount of energy required for each jump which means they do get enough energy, do eat and therefore exist etc etc.

Though I like your theory better. Much more confusing and philosopical.

You yourself came up with the reasoning behind why a kangaroo would survive. Therefore that doomed specie must exist in your brain for you to know that it was doomed. If it did not exist in your brain, you would not know what this doomed specie is. Therfore, I can say for certainty that Unicorns, vampires, aliens, magic, and God all exist. Along with that imaginary friend of yours, Mr Pratchett.

If Mr Pratchett isn't imagianry old boy. He's a rather succesful author who used the analogy of kangaroos not existing to make a point in one of his books.

More tea?

At 10/15/06 04:48 AM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote:

If Mr Pratchett isn't imagianry old boy. He's a rather succesful author who used the analogy of kangaroos not existing to make a point in one of his books.

I am quite aware of that. My dear mother has quite a wide selection of his Discworld novels. I was merely trying to poke a little fun.

More tea?

Why, yes please.

I discovered today the true identity of the "faggots" included in Morrison's sunday lunches (I had lamb this time). They are in fact, balls of sausagemeat stuffing. While I am not unaccustomed o having sausagemeat stuffing, I am more used to sage and onion, as it's all we ever seemed to have back home.

Some liquor for your tea?

At 10/15/06 11:25 AM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote: I am quite aware of that. My dear mother has quite a wide selection of his Discworld novels. I was merely trying to poke a little fun.

Your mother ahs excellent taste

More tea?

Why, yes please.

I discovered today the true identity of the "faggots" included in Morrison's sunday lunches (I had lamb this time). They are in fact, balls of sausagemeat stuffing. While I am not unaccustomed o having sausagemeat stuffing, I am more used to sage and onion, as it's all we ever seemed to have back home.

Really? I never knew that. well you learn soemthing new everyday/

<sips tea>

Some liquor for your tea?

Yes please old boy.

At 10/12/06 08:27 AM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote:

now cannot even say homosexual. Instead you have to say OTPOSS: Oriented Towards Persons Of Same Sex; which sounds quite horrid to me, making it sound like a disease.

Alas, Poltical Correctness, Orweilism, oh dear.... nevermind lads, anyone for Socialism?
Or you could stick with, tea....I don't mind...

At 10/15/06 02:59 PM, spiked wrote:

At 10/12/06 08:27 AM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote:

now cannot even say homosexual. Instead you have to say OTPOSS: Oriented Towards Persons Of Same Sex; which sounds quite horrid to me, making it sound like a disease.

Alas, Poltical Correctness, Orweilism, oh dear....

Precisely. For one thing, what about bisexuals? OTPOBS? Sounds even more ridiculous!

nevermind lads, anyone for Socialism?

Sounds like a good break from the current...

Or you could stick with, tea....I don't mind...

Also a good plan.

... Chaps?

At 10/16/06 06:59 PM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote: ... Chaps?

I say! A tumbleweed! Who left the door open?

Gents!!

I have a matter of utmost, well not quite, but sincere urgency!

In the British Satirical Comedy Club (link in sig), we are planning on creating a collaborative flash animation based on sketch show dynamics.

We have one problem. Despite the large amounts of sketch ideas, and voice actors, we have but one animator: myself.

I am not the most accomplished animator, so I cannot take on this whole task myself. Are there any of you gents willing and able to assist the club, and me, in this task?

I'm afraid I can't help you Leonardo old boy as my flashing talent is somewhat limited. I believe Kensington can Flash however, I seem to remember watching soemthing of his in the past...though I could be wrong.

Herro gentremen. Me hate brack peopre. How you gentreman? Arr yo race are berong us.

At 10/17/06 02:51 PM, JapStud wrote: Herro gentremen. Me hate brack peopre. How you gentreman? Arr yo race are berong us.

Where's that Standard Moron Response Message when you need it?

Oh, nevermind.

Ahem.

Leave now, for you are completely misinformed and stupid. May you live out your life in ignorance, and not pass on your genes of misconception. Good luck on your bid for the Darwin Awards. Good day to you.

At 10/17/06 01:13 PM, Tri-Nitro-Toluene wrote: I'm afraid I can't help you Leonardo old boy as my flashing talent is somewhat limited. I believe Kensington can Flash however, I seem to remember watching soemthing of his in the past...though I could be wrong.

alas you are mistaken dear sir, I am not an animator, although I am starting to learn the basics. It would take me a long time to produce anything near decent.
Sorry chaps.

At 10/18/06 09:14 AM, Lord-Kensington wrote: alas you are mistaken dear sir, I am not an animator, although I am starting to learn the basics. It would take me a long time to produce anything near decent.
Sorry chaps.

hmm...must have been someone else then...it was defintley someone who frequented this club though...oh bugger it. It'll come to me eventually.

<sips tea>

Wish me luck chaps, I shall be fencing against Keil University's team in 20 mins. We lost last time, so they are due for a thrashing!

Death or Glory!!!

Belated luck old boy! May the constraints of time and space not hinder the sending of fortune from the here and now to the there and then.

In similar news, a good friend of mine stationed in Coventry university is competing in badminton against my own Lincoln University's team. Not being a fan of sport itself, I wish him all the best in giving us a thrashing!!

At 10/18/06 09:55 AM, Leonardo-Da-Finchy wrote:

Not being a fan of sport itself, I wish him all the best in giving us a thrashing!!

And so he did!

I must apologise it was Bangor university we were facing, it was the women's team who were facing Kiel. Anyhoo, we gave them a damn good thrashing, winning overall by 27 points! An outstanding victory if I do say so myself.

At present it is 00.16 and I am just about to retire to my chambers, one has been working on a criminalistics brief for tomorrow. (Who would have though blood splatter analysis would be so time consuming).

I digress, lord knows what time i'll get up at, am sooo tired.

'Hibbsworth get the hotwater bottle ready.'