Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Wade you guys should have a warning system set up to crack down on people who create mass accounts and break other rules

At 12/6/04 09:56 PM, WadeFulp wrote:

At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, Mr_Fluffykins wrote: Oh wade, since you online, could you have a look at my Movie , it was flagged unfairly, its not real porn!! thanks <3

I just set all whistle entries to be cleared tomorrow morning. So resubmit it once you get the notice it has been removed.

oh no i will not resubmit it, its horrible, it was just a joke, so thanks goodnight<3

At 12/6/04 09:46 PM, WadeFulp wrote: You have already been warned when I made my front page post. If you did this in the past, I'm not going to come after you. If you do this from now on I will. I'm not going to warn people a 2nd time after I have already warned everyone.

Hmm, ok then. I was just hoping you would take the time to individually email offenders. Thanks.

O great Wade,
I just have one question:
I hate the Star Syndicate for obvious reasons (stupid crappy daily toons) and I try everyday to blam their movies, but they still get about 2.3, am I wrong to vote 0?

At 12/6/04 10:05 PM, WadeFulp wrote: If I see questionable activity I would most likely send a warning. I have sent warnings in the past to people.

Alright, sounds good to me.

They DO deserve ONE portal award though: the "Turd Of The Week" award.

At 12/6/04 10:06 PM, WadeFulp wrote: I haven't seen many of these yet, but the one I saw wasn't blam material. Some maybe, some may not be. So you should watch enough of them to determine if they should stay or go. As long as they are taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.

I gotta admit Wade, that some of the Daily Toons are blamworthy

<---- One of the few people who collab them

But some are worthy of passing.

It's because that there are the blam/protect consciece people around who are voting to protect them, despite how poor they might be.
Surely enough, the star syndicate gets accused of 'mass voting' (which I feel is a damn stupid term/accusation).
Theyre not passing because we have a shit load of members voting them through, there's only about 30 members in total, most being inactive, and 1/3 of the actives living in Australia.

No, they are not winning unfair awards, so i really dont see any problem.

At 12/6/04 08:17 PM, -Michael- wrote: Gooie what have you've done?! You've ticked off Wade with your prepubescent whining!

I'm older than you >:(

You'll be happy to know that Ruby Tuesday's fired me. Great idea, Mike.

Come on Gooie, get in your bear suit.

1) that's a high school picture of me

2) fix my blog >:(

At 12/6/04 08:16 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Gooie doesn't respond well to criticism }8-}

After you get laid off, you aren't really in a bad mood.

That made my day, wade.

I'm glad.

Wade and Jim, I sent you an email.

At 12/6/04 09:50 PM, SlyTom202 wrote: WADE!!!! IF A SUBMITION IS SENT TWICE BECAUSE IT WAS BLAMMED BEFOR, AND U REALIZE ITS THE SAME SUBMISSION, CAN U IMEDDIATLY BLAM OR PROTECT IT????

If you read the whole topic you would allready know the answer to this. I will quote Wade response to my question earlier. Look back at the bottom of page 4 for the whole Q and A post.

At 12/6/04 11:24 AM, WadeFulp wrote: You should watch it to see if the author made any improvements. However common sense comes in to play here. If it's blammed and the author resubmits it minutes later, he probably didn 't change anything, but you never know if the author was making improvements while his entry was under judgment for several hours, or wahtever. So you should check for improvements. If you keep blamming their stuff, they will get banned for 30 days. If they start up from another account it's probably best to just keep blamming.

I think that clears that up quite well.

in all due respect... some movies are just bullshit before you even watch 5 seconds of them. punish the people submitting bullshit entries by locking their IP addresses. 2/5 entries i watch are jokes. 1/5 most likely justr sucks ass. 1/5 maybe controversial. 1/5 actually deserves to get in. im not going to watch a stupid MS paint pikachu jerk off to DBZ or whatever for more than 2 seconds. I also think you should consider other things like double voting (not in portal). for example, if im in a rush somewhere and want to log my exp now b4 i lose the chance then im gonna vote on entries that ive already watched and have a set score to give (things like fallen angel teaser, dads home, etc). i may not have time now to watch it but that doesnt mean i havnt before. all i say is to be fair. consider most of the utter bullshit things submitted before punishment is dealt.

thats all

I will admit, I have given out 1's before, and I have given out the occasional 5, but I tend to vote (when I do, which is very rarely) mor ein the middle I think. I just gave something a 0 though, but purely because of the fact the screen was far too small, a profile pic is much bigger even, how can you play the game, or see it.

Finally! All those dumbass people who submit gay content that should have a negative score that get in the 1.0-3.0 range, ITS REDICULOUS.

I know some you should ban already, some of the star syndicate!

At 12/6/04 10:11 PM, Evark wrote:

At 12/6/04 10:06 PM, WadeFulp wrote: As long as they aren't taking Portal awards they don't deserve, I'm not to worried about them.

Which begs the question about way back in January when illwillpress won the turd of the week award. Will there be something done about such widespread abuse of the system?

The only award that movie deserved, was turd of the week.

That movie was just horrible. There was no way any group of persons could have voted it down several thousand times.

At 12/6/04 07:35 PM, WadeFulp wrote: So now you enjoy the NG intro Flash? Funny, from your initial comment about it I was under the impression you didn't like it:

i said "and i noticed that it can sometimes ruin the mood of a flash." that is hardly 'THAT THING IS HORRIBLE I HATE IT GET RID OF IT". i also believe that salt tastes bad, ruins the mood, if you will, on salad, but that doesn't mean i don't put it on my fries. the ng intro flash is nice in it's own little sense, but sometimes, sometimes, it can deter from the mood of the flash.

Sorry, I didn't think I could hurt the feelings of someone, with my silly words, who has a picture of a girl with a face full of cum as their profile image.

faces full of cum are god's gift to wanting mouths. bad words, however, are the devil.

ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.

Yeah. It's still a mystery how SS gets away with scores higher than a 2. Bigger a mystery than who killed Kennedy. (lol)

At 12/6/04 11:20 PM, madhatt3r wrote:
faces full of cum are god's gift to wanting mouths. bad words, however, are the devil.

ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.

Is that Avril Lavigne? (or whatever the hell that fucking canadians name is)

At 12/6/04 11:20 PM, madhatt3r wrote: ps it's actually soap but nice to see you've got cumshots on the mind wade.

I think it was the 'HORNY TEENS 4 HOT COCK' that threw him off. ;D

But how do you know?!?!?!?!?!

I just won't vote on things I don't like. I'm not gonna' sit there and watch some 10-15 min. piece of garbage while I could be watching something I like.

i think its good that you are cracking down on some of these fools, i mean, people will blam movies just because an author has no previous submissions, how fucking encouraging

I think you should compile a list and publish it as a top 50 portal cheaters list.

would be the best list ever.

seriously.

At 12/6/04 09:57 PM, stevezarebski wrote: Wade you guys should have a warning system set up to crack down on people who create mass accounts and break other rules

ahh mass accounts. it reminds me of the whole adam_z thing. lmao

At 12/7/04 12:06 AM, 23450 wrote: what about voting without watching on the top 50. when i go to get my five entries a day i just go to bitey, vote 5, go to TSAH, vote 5, 8-bit theatre, vote 0, and so on. i dont really see why you guys would have a problem with voting like that on the top 50, but meh, if you do i will not do it. so does anyone care?

its just for judgement right?

is not such a bad idea, but i think it would be a nice idea for the users to see some of the banned users as like this is what will get you ... and then a tiger or something

I run away now