At 10/15/04 08:39 PM, madhatt3r wrote:
At 10/15/04 06:29 PM, Skizor wrote:
Is it just me or is Tom slowly turning the casual mood of newgrounds into a business? Like how he just let the lego thing passed, like how he's advertising other groups for 'free gifts'? Seems to me like Tom's slowly turning into a sellout.
it's called making MONEY off of your creation. anyone would do the same thing. it's called making a living.
*Sigh* To begin with, I agree he has a right to put anything he damn well pleases on his website, freedom of speech, first amendment, I know.
Secondly... making money off your creation, huh? Well, Tom's making plenty of money earning to earn a living right now, and while I'm perfectly fine with him trying to get more (that's what greed is for, folks!), what I DON'T LIKE is the freedom and quality of newgrounds going down as a result.
Why do I think the freedom and quality of newgrounds is going down as a result of Tom just 'trying to make money which is perfecty acceptable'?
Save money and time by not fighting for the right for users to submit movies even involving legos and the background, that's example one. Tom advertising anyone who gives him stuff example two. Newgrounds becoming more money oriented lately with contests, example three. Oh yeah, and whatabout that crafty move tom made, y'know, the news that was an underhanded excuse to coax us into buying serius corporation stock!
Lemme just quote this for clarity:
" I'm also really tempted to buy some Sirius stock... Right now it's at $3.35 per share, but has gained 22% today. At a low price like that, it seems you could make a killing! I would imagine it will at least double by the end of today. "
Uhuh, that's just him rambling in his head, he's just putting that on the news for absolutely no good reason because he feels like it! Right, I'll believe it when I see it. Y'know what happens when someone else buys stock in a company you already hold stock in? I'll tell you what. Your stock value goes up. And even if that's not enough, the company being invested in becomes more secure, helping you in the end anyway. So Tom just mysteriously out of the blue makes a statement suggesting how great it would be if we all bought sirius stock right now. He says he hasn't bought stock, but I doubt it, I bet he already bought a good few shares before announcing this, just so the value would go up even more. And not only that, but doing so is illegal, if that's what he did. There's not enough evidence to make a case, but it's strange nonetheless. That's the fourth example.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not under the delusion that I'm going to force tom to stop here. I can't do that. He's allowed to say whatever he wants, and do whatever he wants here, it's his website. I know that. And I know it's not like he's doing anything particularly illegal or evil by trying to make a few bucks (except in the possible case of part four.)
What I AM against, is Tom allowing the freedom, fun, quality, community, and promotion of young artistic and programming skills here at newgrounds to deteriorate because of greed. It hasn't happened in any significant way yet, it might not happen at all, but it's happened in visible ways.
I'm not sure whether you guys think you're loyally defending your great friend tom here, and if you do, I don't know why. Even if this was a viable enough attack that it merits response, if that was the case, how could you defend it with idealistic images of tom? I'm not being mean to your pal tom, if I'm right, then I'm not the one mean here, and if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I'm not saying that "TOM SHOULD BE FORCED TO BE A GOOD LITTLE BOY!" I'm just saying that there's a level of evidence pointing towareds a level of greed leaking into NG, and while greed is fine on it's own, if it begins to affect newgrounds negatively, I don't like it. I don't like it at all. It's my opinion that Tom is somewhat leaning in the direction of being a sellout for his previous ideals, he hasn't yet, but he may, that's my opinion, and you can't argue that unless you have proof of his innocence. Which judging from the type of accusation I'm launching, proof would be quite hard to find, unless you can prove that you can read tom's mind.
Just my paranoia, for all I know it could be wrong, innocent until proven guilty, but who says I can't have my suspicions. I get to voice my opinion about tom, just as much as he can voice his opinion.
-Skizor