Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Rate me.

i asked all the way back on page three.

At 10/4/04 06:41 PM, Seizure_Dog wrote:

At 10/4/04 05:11 PM, Seizure_Dog wrote: Hehe, this looks like fun :) I hope somebody gets around to rating me...

Dum de do da. *Waits patiently*

Well as I only pay attention to a few people here, and honestly there are so many users choking the BBS, it's hard to keep names straight... but I must say you are one of the cooler members here, even if we have disagreed in the past (I say that because it's very well within the realm of possibility). Your posts are usually quite refreshing. Not as refreshing as a soap and water enema, but refreshing nonetheless...

At 10/4/04 06:42 PM, API- wrote:

Dum de do da. *Waits patiently*

Hey, it will come soon. I'm not the one who rates EVERYONE! Its a group effort.

I know :) Thats why I'm waiting patiently.

You know, this reminds me back when Dobio had that thread like this. Sadly, he never got around to me :(

At 10/4/04 06:50 PM, DrManhattan wrote:

Well as I only pay attention to a few people here, and honestly there are so many users choking the BBS, it's hard to keep names straight... but I must say you are one of the cooler members here, even if we have disagreed in the past

Wow, thanks :) I feel so flattered. But um, I can't really rememeber seeing you elesewhere (like you said, there's a lot of names to keep up with) Where/when/how did we disagree in the past?

At 10/4/04 06:11 PM, king-o-games1 wrote:

At 10/4/04 05:59 PM, NiTeAnGeL wrote:

overall: 7/10
Good job.

thnx much king-o-games :)
i'd thought i'd get less

i was skipped so ill just ask one more time, can anyone rate mine, id like to see what other people think.

At 10/4/04 06:54 PM, Seizure_Dog wrote:

Wow, thanks :) I feel so flattered. But um, I can't really rememeber seeing you elesewhere (like you said, there's a lot of names to keep up with) Where/when/how did we disagree in the past?

That's ok. No one remembers me anyway. I just remember you saying something to me once... I think, and well, I guess I felt famous for a minute. *sigh*

At 10/4/04 06:57 PM, NiTeAnGeL wrote:

thnx much king-o-games :)
i'd thought i'd get less

Ok. I rate you 5/10... See? Never let it be said that I disappoint!

You know that a lot of you that haven't been rated could take the initiative and rate someone else that hasn't been rated, right? That way, maybe the one who rated you will do you the favor in return...

At 10/4/04 07:24 PM, Chronos_the_almighty wrote: You know that a lot of you that haven't been rated could take the initiative and rate someone else that hasn't been rated, right? That way, maybe the one who rated you will do you the favor in return...

No, I don't know that. Now rate me and I might consider trying to rape you if I really feel like it.

Ahem, rate I mean.

At 10/4/04 07:07 PM, Soul_Specter wrote: i was skipped so ill just ask one more time, can anyone rate mine, id like to see what other people think.

Post Quality:
Your posts seem pretty helpful and intellemagent. +7

Level:
Level nine. Bleh. -2

Username:
I like it, it's catchy. +5

Review Quality:
Your reviews are alright, but you seem to call people "gay" a lot and mainly just insult the author. -1

Flash:
None.

Style:
OMG BAHD GRAMER LOLZ!!111 -2

Overall:
Seven slash ten. Not bad.

At 10/4/04 07:08 PM, DrManhattan wrote:

That's ok. No one remembers me anyway. I just remember you saying something to me once... I think, and well, I guess I felt famous for a minute. *sigh*

hehe. well, I'll be sure to remember you from now on at least :P

At 10/4/04 08:04 PM, That-Is-Bull wrote: rated.

yeah, i really dont review unless that person does something really dumb like insult another person or if that person needs help. the one where it said i posted that the guy should suck cock wasnt me, it was my friend who was visiting from california, i got banned for that.
and me and my friend are working on a game right now too, but thanx.

Only people who have rated me, have been those i asked to :D, well how about one of you

How about NO.

At 10/4/04 09:20 PM, WeedClock wrote: How about NO.

How about... You are an idiot, and this topic has seven pages? And don't post in topics you don't like!

At 10/4/04 09:20 PM, WeedClock wrote: How about NO.

I'll rate you as much as i know so far

Posts and Value Of Posts

86 posts. its ok not alot, i have seen some crappy posts from you though that are pure spam. though i have done the same so cant complain too much. -3

Name

Im not too into your name cause there is hundreds of clock clones ( or it seems like it). You support weed though you are only 13 -3

Blams/Saves

still a little fresh in this area only 41 blames and 4 saves. but im fine with that. +1

Submitted Work

Well, need to work on this here unless you are going to be a reviewer only. +0

Whistle Level

Still normal though i am normal so i cant critcize here. +2

Voting Power

1.80, not that much but you can earn that up. +1

Overall

Id say your a 6-10, you can improve!

I'm rating BonusStage :D This rating is on /20 (OGM quote from my rating on sk)

Post Quality:
approximately 4170 posts, most of them are spam but many of them are interesting. He's a funny guy. He quoted me many times. +3
He's sexy while posting. +1

Level:
Level 10, that's below me only +1

Username: Name from a serie that went downhill. I still like the old episodes. He's not too original. +1
Changing name every day -1
Didn't change his name to something similar to mine. +1

Voting power: 7.20 he's in top500 and he's over me +1

b/p pts: Over 11500, ratio doesn't show that he's a light aura +1

Review Quality:All his reviews are constructives and long +3

Flash:None Audio: None 0 pt (hey, at least you don't lose pts)

Style: Profile message +1, Nice profile picture +1, sig + signature are ok +1

More: He participates in the whereis/howto forum. He congratulates members that get at rounded and nice stats. +3

Overall a 17/20 for sk. Not as good as sk but that's only because you didn't make a total listing for me. It's still a good score.

At 10/4/04 09:36 PM, EKRegulus wrote: I'm rating BonusStage :D This rating is on /20 (OGM quote from my rating on sk)

Overall a 17/20

Wow thanks EK i find that very nice of you, but i'm not so sure about the Bonus Stage going downhill comment .. i just thought he stopped submitting to newgrounds, not sure why, but the series is definately up and running, and is still funny in my opinion :\

can I get a real rate this time please?

oh my god, are people just ignoring me, could someone plz rate me

At 10/4/04 09:43 PM, NameChanginIs4LoZ3r5 wrote:

At 10/4/04 09:36 PM, EKRegulus wrote: I'm rating BonusStage :D This rating is on /20 (OGM quote from my rating on sk)

Overall a 17/20

Wow thanks EK i find that very nice of you, but i'm not so sure about the Bonus Stage going downhill comment .. i just thought he stopped submitting to newgrounds, not sure why, but the series is definately up and running, and is still funny in my opinion :\

I was talking about those episodes. I stopped watching at 25-26 because it I thought it wasn't as funny as the first ones. Maybe, I just got bored to see the same lazy animation at every episode.

BS # 15 is in my favorite. That one was really funny.

At 10/4/04 09:47 PM, EKRegulus wrote: I was talking about those episodes. I stopped watching at 25-26 because it I thought it wasn't as funny as the first ones. Maybe, I just got bored to see the same lazy animation at every episode.

well they seem to be trying harder, though the mouths are still off :D, the rest has improved quite a bit, a lot more is taken into account these days

BS # 15 is in my favorite. That one was really funny.

Well my old favorite it #6 aka the Nye, and #3 had the best ending song ever heh, but #39 is my new favorite

Sure...this seems like it could provide a good laugh. That and I'm an attention whore. So....rate me plz?

You... you're at least 200 billion trillion.

Alright, sixth tim I'ven said it.

Rate me!

this topic is not fast enough to rate everone thats asking.

and we all know what this topic is waiting for.....and thats for me to be rated. so do it and get it over with

How would I rate?

At 10/4/04 10:19 PM, SoulBlazerX wrote: How would I rate?

see first page, and be fair

At 10/4/04 10:19 PM, Dizfunktion wrote: I might not being doning this right but I;ll try:

No, you're not. You were suppose to rate me higher.

Post Quality:
2,000 post, none of them seem spammish. +3

Alright.

Level:
10, +1

Alright.

Username: That-Is-Bull VERY DUMB. -2

Psh, it "pwns" yours. Some people like mine, some people don't.

b/p pts: a little more than 100. +0

Yeah, I don't blam and protect much.

Review Quality: None that were bad. +1

I don't review much either.

Flash: Stupid sound boards, 2 of the same thing. -2

Stupid soundboards? They're better than pretty much any other soundboard on Newgrounds. And they weren't both the same thing. I added a lot more to the second one. If you would actually look at them and play them, you would realize that. Just because they have the same title doesn't mean they're the same.

Style: good profile picture, sig + signature is pretty kool. +1

Yes.

4/10 ish?

BADlolz

Someone else rate me, please.